The Millbank Prison photographer, 1888

PRISONER POSES Tasmania 1870s and 1880s
PENTRIDGE PRISON Victoria 1874
MILLBANK PRISON UK photographic practices 1888



"Burial-Ground at Millbank Prison. From a Photograph by Herbert Watkins, 179, Regent Street." Wikipedia

When Thomas J. Nevin photographed prisoners in Tasmania in the decade 1870-1880, his preferred pose for photographing the prisoner was in semi-profile, torso sometimes visible to the waist. No particular emphasis was placed on capturing marks, tattoos, and disfigurement of the hands. Further reduction of information occurred when he printed the final image as a carte-de-visite in an oval mount, a format small enough to fit onto a criminal record.



People/Orgs: Williamson, Allan Matthew
Places: Campbell Street Gaol, Hobart (Tas.)
Institution: Penitentiary Chapel Historic Site Management Committee
Object number: PCH_00033



Prisoner Robert Ogden (1861?-1883), known as James Odgen, executed on 4th June 1883 at the Hobart Goal for murder.
Photographed by Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol, 23 September 1875.
Source of image: State Library of NSW
Miscellaneous Photographic Portraits ca. 1877-1918
36. James Ogden
Call Number DL PX 158:

Studio portraiture by commercial artists such as Thomas Nevin was requested by prison and police authorities during the early years from the late 1860s to the 1880s, for economic reasons, as stated in the case of the Pentridge photographer in Victoria.



Source: Launceston Examiner 22 Aug 1874

TRANSCRIPT
VICTORIA. The system of taking photographic likenesses of prisoners at the Pentridge Stockade is stated to have proved of great assistance to the police department in detecting crime. The system was commenced at Pentridge about two years ago, and since then one of the officials who had a slight knowledge of the art, with the assistance of a prisoner has taken nearly 7000 pictures, duplicates of which have been sent to all parts of this and the adjacent colonies. But it has been considered rather too expensive, to employ an official entirely for the purpose, and as constant employment could not be provided in the future, a photographer has lately been appointed, who will visit the stockade twice in the week, and the hulks at Williamstown once. --Argus.
The Victorian government employed a commercial photographer to visit the Pentridge prison twice weekly, and to visit the hulks moored at Williamstown once a week. Police found it cheaper if the photographer visited the prisons twice week rather than employing a warden or constable full-time.

During the decades 1880-1890 at the Hobart Gaol, commercial photographer Thomas Nevin and his brother Constable John Nevin deployed various techniques in both the posing of the prisoner for the capture and the printing of the final portrait. In some instances, they retained the conventional printing format of commercial carte-de-visite production; in others, they posed the prisoner in a full face pose with his gaze directed at the camera lens. In some - but not as consistently as was the case with New Zealand police photographers - they requested the prisoner to show his hands.



NZ police mugshot of Amy Bock 1886, daughter of Alfred Bock, Nevin's partner 1863-67
Source: New Zealand Police Museum

All three variations can be seen in this collection held at the Tasmanian Archives and Heritage Office, now on Flickr: all of these mugshots were taken in the 1880s at the Hobart Gaol.

TAHO Commons Collection at Flickr

Tasmanian gaol records (1860-1936)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)Tasmanian gaol records (1895-1897)

Tasmanian convict + prison photos, a set by Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office on Flickr (Commons).



TAHO File numbers: GD128/1/1; GD128/1/2

By the late 1880s, the Bertillon method of photographing prisoners twice, in profile and full frontal, was adopted universally by prison authorities; the prominent display of hands was a new requirement.

Millbank Prison 1888
What follows is a journalist's description of a visit to Millbank Prison (UK) in 1888 to watch the prison photographer at work. In the first paragraph, the "liberty man" is being photographed for discharge. In the last paragraph the journalist gives some technical details: the photographer "gives an exposure of fifteen seconds with a wet plate and No. 2 B lens, and secures an admirable negative."



TRANSCRIPT

PHOTOGRAPHING IN MILLBANK PRISON.
The photographer at Millbank is one of the steel- buttoned warders, and we congratulate him on his well-arranged studio. Here are some pictures he has just taken — half profile, bold, clear, and vigorous portraits, well lighted, and altogether unlike what prison photographs usually are. There is no 'prentice hand here, and we say so.

A sitter is departing as we arrive — a man in ordinary attire, his short, cutaway beard giving him the appearance of a foreigner. Our guide sees our look of astonishment — ' He is a liberty man, and is photographed in liberty clothes ; he goes out next week, and has, therefore, been permitted to grow a beard during the past three months ;' and on the desk we see a printed form referring to him, to which his photograph will presently be attached, ' Seven years' penal servitude, three years' police supervision,' is upon it. His crime was forgery.

What, we ask, if a man refuse to be photographed just before the expiration of his sentence ? Our guide smiles — 'It is a very simple matter ; a man is usually set at liberty before his time, but only if he conforms to our regulations.' The guide leaves us for a while, and the photographer asks if he shall go on with his work. We reply in the affirmative, and he quits the studio to fetch a sitter. He is not long gone, for there are plenty outside in the yard we have just crossed, men in grey, ambling round the flagged area at a rapid pace at a fixed distance from one another, and reminding you vividly of a go-as-you please race at the Agricultural Hall.
He is a young man of stalwart build, the sitter, when he appears, and as docile as a dog. He is clean shaven, and has an ugly black L on his sleeve, which means, poor fellow, that he is a 'Lifer.' There is a wooden arm-chair for posing.

'Look here, I want you to sit down like this,' says our friend the photographer, placing him sideways in the chair, so as to give a half profile. The convict does as he is told, and evidently enjoys the business immensely. 'Don't throw your head back quite so much ; there, that will do. Now put your hands on your breast, so.' For the shrewd governor believes that a photograph of a man's hands is as important almost as that of his face. The warder photographer retires to coat his plate, and we are left for a moment with a 'Lifer.

Why shouldn't he make a rush for it, fell us to the earth, and have a try for liberty? He might be a murderer; that he had committed a terrible crime was certain from his sentence. Keep the camera between yourself and the man, and be ready to roar out lustily if he so much as move a muscle, was one precaution that occurred to us; or should we knock him down out of hand before he began any mischief at all ? No such precautionary measures are called for. Indeed, it made one smile to think of such a thing as resistance. One might, perhaps, conjure up such thoughts as these in the presence of a typical convict; but the facts here are very commonplace.

On the arm-chair opposite you sits a young man, almost a boy, with a frank, good-humoured face — a poor fellow who is evidently luxuriating in a delightful moment of release from drudging work and monotonous labour. And as to the bravado and ruffianism, there is just the same difference between the daring robber and this gray-clad humble individual as there is between a fighting cock with his plumes and feathers and a plucked fowl on the poulterer's counter.

The photographer comes back to the docile prisoner, focusses; gives an exposure of fifteen seconds with a wet plate and No. 2 B lens, and secures an admirable negative. ' I have never had the least difficulty,' he says, after he has led back his charge, ' either with the men or the women. The men are apt to be too grave, and the women are sometimes , given to giggling, that is perhaps the only drawback I have to contend against'
FULL ARTICLE



Source: National Library of New Zealand
Papers Past & Tuapeka Times,  29 August 1888
Page 5 PHOTOGRAPHING IN MILL. BANK PRISON.

RELATED POSTS main weblog

John Nevin snr Service Records in The First or Royal Regiment 1825-1841

John Nevin, father of Tasmanian photographer Thomas J. Nevin, was born in 1808 at Grey Abbey, County Down, a small town east of Belfast on the coast of Ireland. At that period the region was the centre of Irish cotton manufacturing and a growing centre of linen exports to rival Dublin. When John Nevin enlisted as a Private in the First or Royal Regiment of Foot in October 1825 (The Royal Scots) at the tender age of seventeen, his trade was "weaver". His service record shows he was under age at attestation. First service began at the age of 18 years.

John Nevin's full service lasted 14 years and 237 days in the West Indies and Canada. His record shows his service in the West Indies dated from 30th November 1827 to 30th January 1836, and in Canada from 16th June 1836. He was discharged at London, West Canada on 31 May 1841 on medical grounds (rheumatism,  liver complaints, disease of the urinary organs), and returned to England eventually as a Chelsea pensioner.

Before leaving England once more to travel as a guard on board the convict hulk the Fairlie in 1852, bound for Tasmania, Australia, John Nevin had become a husband and father of four children, and had spent a lonely and unprofitable time on the Californian gold fields, described in his poem "My Cottage in the Wilderness"(1868).



Available at Google books is this full contemporary account of The First or Royal Regiment of Foot, by Richard J. Cannon, published in 1838, which details in the last pages the activities of the regiment in the West Indies 1826-1836, where John Nevin served from the age of seventeen at enlistment (1825) to the battles in the Canadian rebellions of 1837-38, in which John Nevin participated, some details of which appeared in his Obituary published in the Tasmanian newspaper The Mercury (11th October, 1887), viz ...

In his day he was a wielder of the pen as well as of the sword, and was some 50 years ago a contributor to the infant Press in London, Canada West, when the present city of that name was a struggling town of rough and rude buildings and log huts. As a soldier of the Royal Scots he served under his colonel, Sir G.A. Wetherall, and the present Sir Daniel Lyons [i.e. Lysons] was his ensign; and he did his duty in very stirring times in the Canadian Rebellion of 1837-1838. He was engaged in the storming and capture of St.Charles and St. Eustache and in engagements of St. Dennis, St. Benoit, and many other operations on the Richelieu River and adjacent country of Chambly, and at Terra-Bone [i.e. Terrebonne] he assisted in the capture of a large number of French prisoners during a severe winter campaign, often struggling with his comrades to the waist in snow in following his officers in the work of quelling the rebellion of Papineau. John Nevin's proudest boast was that he had been a soldier of the Royals.



Above: Colonel A. Wetherall as Cpt Wetherall in 1818. Brown University Archive.
He signed John Nevin's discharge confirmation from the Regimental Board as Lieutenant Colonel Commanding.

John Nevin's service in the West Indies coincided with the rise of the abolition of slavery campaign led by William Wilberforce in England, coming into law as the Slavery Abolition Act on 1st August 1834, when slavery was abolished throughout British possessions abroad and slaves were emancipated in the colonies.





Page 248: John Nevin began service on 7 October 1825, and embarked at Newry in Ireland in October 1826, disembarking at Barbados and proceeding to St. Lucia



Page 255: By 1832, John Nevin had served on Barbados, Trinidad, and St. Lucia. His service in Canada - see this article - was rewarded with a Good Conduct Badge, conferred on 28th February 1837.

Read these last pages of Richard J. Cannon's contemporary account of the Royals 1st in the West Indies and Canada at this alternate link: The First or Royal Regiment of Foot by Richard J. Cannon, 1838

Read Frederick William Naylor Bayley's contemporary account (1833) Four Years' Residence in the West Indies, During the Years 1826, 7, 8, and 9


At the Chelsea Hospital for Veterans



Above: The Chelsea Pensioner by W. Spooner 1840
Courtesy Brown University Archive

Extract from John Nevin's record (below) refers to the Canadian climate.

Disability or Cause of Discharge
According to the Surgeon's report annexed it appears that Pte John Nevin labors under chronic Rheumatism and liver complaints, and disease of the urinary organs:- that his complaints have been contracted in and by Service in the West Indies and Canada - not by vice, intemperance or design and that he is wholly unfit for further service in this climate and the Regimental Board concur in the opinion of the Surgeon. Conduct in Hospital very good.



At the time of discharge, John Nevin was 32 years and 7 months of age, 5 feet 7 and half inches tall, with brown hair, blue eyes and fair complexion. The records show some variation.



The Thames at Chelsea Hospital ca. 1830
Courtesy of The British Library
Artist: Scharf, George senior
Medium: Pencil on paper
Date: 1830
This drawing depicts Chelsea Hospital seen from the Thames, and includes a plan of the area.
The Royal Hospital Chelsea was founded by King Charles II in 1682 as a refuge for soldiers of the army who had become unfit for duty, either after 20 years service or as a result of injury. On entering the Hospital an old soldier surrendered his army pension in return for board, lodging, clothing and medical care. The residents wore distinctive scarlet coats and black tricorn hats and would have been immediately recognisable.The hospital buildings have not escaped attack from enemy forces, being bombed in 1918 and 1945.




Above: TV snapshot from live BBC-ABC broadcast 3 June 2012 of the Queen inspecting Chelsea Pensioners at the Pageant on the Thames (KLW Imprint 2012).

Service Record for John Nevin
for the years 1825-1841 (12 images)
served in First, or Royal Regiment of Foot.
Source: Find My Past for UK Archives

A very odd mistake was made by the OMD on page 7 of these forms: he wrote the name "Thomas Nevin" instead of  the correct name, John Nevin, written on all other pages of his service record, viz:
Opinion of the Principal Medical Officer, at Chatham 28 August 1841
After examination at the General Hosptl I am of the opinion that Thomas Nevin
[sic] is unfit for service and wholly to be permanently unqualified for military duty and I approve the opinion of Mr (?) Surgeon
(?) Doctor Smith .... OMD
There may have been a reason for it, yet to be clarified. It's certainly a coincidence that his son Thomas was born almost exactly twelve months later, on 28th August 1842.

















Above left: Portrait of John Nevin ca. 1873 by his son Thomas Nevin
Above right: Portrait of John in 1879, on his second marriage (unattributed)





Above: aerial shot of Grey Abbey ruins, County Down, Ireland



Above: Uniform of the First, or Royal Regiment of Foot
Courtesy of the The Royal Scots Regiment Museum

"Men of scarlet, raise your voices
 Men of scarlet, play your part ..."




RELATED ARTICLES main weblog
for Thomas Nevin’s parents