Passing off: vendors' misidentification tactics to attract bidders at auctions

Misidentification, passing off: vendors and buyers of Tasmaniana at auctions 2019 and 2026
Photographer T. J. NEVIN, siblings W. John NEVIN, Mary-Ann NEVIN and wife Elizabeth Rachel (Day) NEVIN 1870s
Photographer T. D. WEBB, Launceston with Robert Stanton ROTHWELL ca. 1870 



Portrait of Robert Stanton Rothwell by T. D. Webb, Launceston, Tasmania ca. 1870
Inscribed verso "With R.S.R.'s compliments, to Ms E. Bayles, Auburn, Ross"
Misidentified by vendor at Leski's auction (Vic) 31 May 2026 as William John Nevin, brother of photographer T. J. Nevin
Purchased at auction from Leski's for © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection.

Caveat emptor: "let the buyer beware"
In buyer beware market places such as auctions, deliberate misidentification is a ruse whereby the vendor associates a well-known, established name with their obscure object on offer to entice more bidders from a wider group and not just those with deep pockets and niche interests. The final inflated sale price happily arrived at then operates as a sign of value and importance in future airings of the object. In public exhibitions its sale price on acquisition is either flaunted or discretely suppressed, depending on the source of funds. If a buyer with a private collection, on the other hand, comes to see the claims made by the vendor at auction were intentionally fraudulent, they may want to offload the object but find themselves in the same position as their vendor who sold it to them. They must now offer the inflated sale price they paid to pass the object on and pass it off as possessing "value" using their vendor's prior sale price as "evidence".


Case 1: this is not Marcus Clarke (1846-1881)
A recent example is the cdv by H. H. Baily claimed at auction to be a portrait of author Marcus Clarke, famous for his historic novel about convictism set in Tasmania, For the Term of His Natural Life (1874). The reclining gent of this photograph at Baily's studio ca. 1869-1870 in all probability was Clarke's editor at the Argus, F. W. Haddon who travelled with Clarke to the Port Arthur prison, Tasmania in 1870. When sent to auction in 2019 (Sydney Rare Books Auctions, passed in) and again to Leski's Auctions on 31 May 2026, this cdv which the vendor was hoping to pass off as a portrait of Marcus Clarke was offered at the staggering price of $2000. It was listed on the day as sold for $2200 (Lot #1116). The bidder #9374 also bought the cdv by Launceston photographer W. Burrows & Co. (see below) of an unidentified woman for $200 which was wrongly identified and sold at the same auction as a portrait of photographer Thomas J. Nevin's wife Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin.




Sourced online at Leski's Auctions, Melbourne in May 2026
Catalogue notes (strike-through is ours):
Lot 1116:
[TASMANIAN INTEREST] A circa 1870 carte-de-visite featuring Marcus Clarke (1846-1881), Australian novelist best known for his 1874 novel "For the Term of His Natural Life", produced by H.H. Baily (Hobart). Taken during a brief visit to Tasmania in January 1870 at the behest of the Argus, Clarke is seen here striking a pose befitting a young bohemian of the time, lying on a chaise longue, gazing directly at the camera.
However, as per today's date, 30 August 2026, the same Lot #1116 at Leski's is now listed as UNSOLD, with an estimate of $500 - $750!!

Read more about Marcus Clarke, F. W. Haddon and this photograph here

BRIEF BIOGRAPHY Frederick William HADDON (1839–1906)[extract]
Source: https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/haddon-frederick-william-3686

... Haddon worked first as a contributor to the Argus and then as sub-editor. He became co-editor of the new weekly Australasian in 1864 and sole editor in 1865. He was promoted editor of the Argus on 1 January 1867. Under his guidance it became, according to Richard Twopeny, 'the best daily paper published out of England'. Meanwhile Saturday night gatherings at his lodgings in 1867-68 and quarters which he briefly shared with Marcus Clarke attracted talented literary friends who in 1868 formed the Yorick Club. Haddon, one of the first trustees, withdrew as the club lost its Bohemianism but retained ties with Marcus Clarke and in 1870 went with him to Tasmania...

Case 2: this is not Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin (1847-1914)
The moral probity of vendors at auctions invites scrutiny when bidders question the provenance of an object, the source of documentation put forward as evidence, the means whereby the vendor came to own it, and their reason for selling it.

The highly questionable use of Thomas J. Nevin's name was a tactic by a vendor to attract interest in this photograph of an unidentified woman with claims it to be a portrait of Thomas J. Nevin's wife, Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin (1847-1914), taken at W. Burrows studio, Launceston ca. 1878. It was offered and passed in at Sydney Rare Books Auctions in June 2019, and when resubmitted by the same vendor (proxy and agent for Ravenswick Auctions) to Leski's Auctions in May 2026, it was sold for $200 to bidder #9374, the same bidder who was willing to pay $2200 for the cdv taken by H. H. Baily in Hobart, claimed by the vendor to be a portrait of author Marcus Clarke (see above). That buyer appears to have subsequently withdrawn their bid on the "Marcus Clarke" cdv, , as Leski's is now (at 29 Aug 2026) offering the same cdv online - Lot #1116 - as UNSOLD with an estimate of $500-750. The buyer with cold feet on that one should also withdraw their bid on this one which is NOT a portrait of Thomas J. Nevin's wife Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin.



Unidentified woman, seated with arm raised, elbow on table, face resting against her hand.
The subject was incorrectly identified at auctions in 2019 and 2026 as the wife of photographer Thomas J. Nevin. This is NOT a portrait of Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin (1847-1914).



Sourced online at Leski's Auctions, Melbourne 31 May 2026
Catalogue notes (strike-through is ours):
Lot #1125
[TASMANIAN INTEREST] A circa 1878 carte-de-visite featuring Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin (1847-1914), wife of Thomas Nevin, produced by W. Burrows & Co. (Launceston).
Lot closed - Price Realized:$200
Estimate: $200 - $300
Leski's Auctions, 727-729 High Street, Armadale, Victoria, 3143, Australia.
Auction: AUSTRALIAN & HISTORICAL
https://www.leski.com.au/auction/australian-historical-11/
Session Two: (Lots 760 – 1540)
Sunday 31 May, 2026 – 10.00am AEST

The buyer at Leski's (#9374), possibly a public institution, paid $200 for this portrait which will now sit in public archives with the vendor's wrong claim that it is a portrait of photographer Thomas J. Nevin's wife, Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin. Its provenance is unknown apart from information provided by Leski's Auctions that it came from the estate of the late Alexander Renwick, auctioneer of Ravenswick Auction House, Sydney. It was previously on offer at Sydney Rare Books Auctions in June 2019 by Renwick's collaborator T. Thompson. When questioned as to provenance, Mr T. Thompson was anything but forthcoming. This cdv associated with Thomas J. Nevin's name at that auction in 2019 was one of six  (6) claiming to be either photos taken by Nevin or members of his family taken by other photographers. Three (3) have yet to surface again at auctions since first offered in 2019 which the vendor claimed to be portraits taken by Thomas J. Nevin of his brother William John Nevin, So there are three more held somewhere by someone no doubt waiting their chance (see ADDENDA below).

This portrait of a seated woman by W. Burrows & Co. Launceston bears no likeness to Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin in features or style. Anyone could have realized the error by comparing the five extant portraits, all held by descent, which Thomas J. Nevin took of his wife, each easily viewable online at these weblogs dedicated to documenting his work and family life. Had successful bidder #9374 contacted us here prior to Leski's auction on 31 May 2026, we could have communicated the misidentification immediately.


Case 3: this is not Mary-Ann Nevin (1844-1878)
The cdv of this young woman clearly bears verso Thomas J. Nevin's most common studio backmark, but whether the sitter was his younger sister Mary Ann (Nevin) Carr  as claimed by the vendor who offered it at Leski's auctions on 31 May 2026, is another matter entirely. Her identity is not ascertainable from any inscribed name or dedication,  and most important, there is no indication of its provenance before its appearance at Sydney Rare Book Auctions auctions in June 2019 and its re-appearance more recently at Leski's Auctions in May 2026 where it was purchased by T. J. Nevin's descendants as an early example of his portraiture technique, now copyrighted to  © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection 2026.

Thomas J. Nevin and his three younger siblings were born in County Down Ireland prior to their arrival on the Fairlie in July 1852 at Hobart, Van Diemen's Land (Tasmania) with their free-settler parents Mary Ann (Dickson) and father John Nevin snr.  Held by descent in the family is a cdv of Thomas' sister Mary Ann Nevin who married James Carr in 1877 and died within weeks of childbirth in 1878. A comparison of her brother Thomas' photographs taken of her ca. 1875 with this one (below) which was possibly taken earlier, ca. 1865, shows little similarity. If, for some reason there was - at some time in the distant past in this cdv's history as it passed from one owner to another - a reason to assume it was a portrait of a sibling of Thomas Nevin, therefore of his sister Mary Ann (Nevin) Carr since no image of his other sister Rebecca Jane had surfaced - this cdv might possibly be Thomas' portrait of his youngest sister Rebecca Jane Nevin, who died in 1865. 



Catalogue notes (strike-through is ours):
Sourced online at Leski's Auctions, Melbourne 31 May 2026

NB: The subject of this cdv was (mis)identified as Mary Anne Nevin (1844-1878) in the catalogue notes at Leski's Auctions, Melbourne, 31 May 2026 where it was offered at auction, per this entry:

Lot #1110
[TASMANIAN INTEREST] A circa 1868 carte-de-visite featuring Mary Anne Nevin (1844-1878), sister of Thomas Nevin, produced by T. Nevin late A. Bock (Hobart).



Subject: A young woman, possibly Rebecca Jane Nevin (1847-1865) ca. 18 years old.
Photographer and date: her brother Thomas J. Nevin ca. 1865, months before her death.
Location: taken at the City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town
Format: Carte-de-visite, sepia albumen print, plain buff mount, head and shoulders of the sitter taken against a dark oval background, possibly seated, her torso slightly turned, her gaze rigid, eyelids dropped and directed left. 
Details: This young woman was captured with lips parted, teeth showing, suggesting intentional smiling. Her dark hair was parted centre, lifted and rolled at the back. Her several items of jewellery included a carved cameo on a short ribbon at her throat;  a brooch - possibly a rose carved from soapstone - pinned at the V-line of her bodice; and a long chain with a trinket tucked into her wide buckled belt pulled tightly at her waist.  Her dress was made from a soft and satiny sheen, accentuated by crocheted pieces edged onto the V-line and appliqued to the shoulders. 
Verso: T. Nevin's commercial studio backstamp in sepia ink (T. Nevin late A. Bock).
Provenance: unknown, offered from the estate of auctioneer Alexander Renwick (Syd) at Sydney Rare Books Auction in June 2019,  offered again and acquired at auction, 31 May 2026 from Leski's (Melb) for this weblog's portfolio of Thomas J. Nevin's photographic works. 
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection 2026

Rebecca Jane Nevin died of causes unknown in 1865. If she was 18 years old in November 1865, she was born ca. 1847 and under 4 yrs old when she departed Portsmouth on the Fairlie in March 1852. Her father John Nevin snr wrote a lament on her death in January 1866 as a tribute to her short life and suffering, titled "Lines on the much lamented death of Rebecca Jane Nevin"; the original is held at the University of Melbourne Library Special Collections.


Case 4: this is not William John Nevin (1852–1891)
In May 2026 this fine cdv taken by T. D. Webb of a handsomely turned-out young man in a summer suit was also on offer at Leski's Auctions, Melbourne. The catalogue notes claimed it was a portrait of William John Nevin (1852–1891), the younger brother of photographer Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923). But comparison with this cdv and three cdv's taken by Thomas between 1868 and 1878 of his brother Constable John (W. J. aka Jack) Nevin which are held by descent in private collections shows no such likeness in style or features. The photographed subject of this cdv offered at Leski's in May 2026 was definitely not Thomas Nevin's younger brother Constable John (William John aka Jack) Nevin.

The vendor's name-dropping tactic of associating T. J. Nevin's name and those of his family members to attract the attention of descendants and/or collectors certainly succeeded, as was their intention when they submitting the cdv to auction  in May 2026. It is an old trick of the con artist to seek out a mark with emotional associations to the object, and a particularly bold attempt in this case, given the signature verso on the cdv - "R.S.R." - contradicts any possible identification of William John Nevin as the subject with those initials.

As descendants we decided to bid for this cdv to take it out of circulation, to correct its misidentification as a portrait William John Nevin with the intention of preventing its acquisition by a public institution or private collector perpetuating the name "William John Nevin" as the portrait subject's identity. Our careful research concluded that this subject of T. D. Webb's portrait ca. 1868-1870 who signed the verso "R.S.R" with a dedication to Miss E. Bayles was 20 year-old Robert Stanton Rothwell (1850-1902). He was the son of John J. Rockwell, Sarah (Rockwell) Crouch's brother, who rose to the position of Under-Sheriff in 1868 when her husband Thomas J. Crouch retired from the position.





Sourced online at Leski's Auctions, Melbourne 31 May 2026
Catalogue notes (strike-through is ours):

Lot #1115
[TASMANIAN INTEREST] A circa 1870 carte-de-visite featuring William John Nevin (1852–1891), younger brother of Thomas Nevin, produced by T.D. Webb (Launceston), with message in ink on reverse "With R.S.R.'s compliments, to Ms E. Bayles, Auburn, Ross".
Estimate: $200 - $300
Starting: $160
Lot closed - Price Realized:$200

Leski's Auctions, 727-729 High Street, Armadale, Victoria, 3143, Australia.
Auction: AUSTRALIAN & HISTORICAL
https://www.leski.com.au/auction/australian-historical-11/
Session Two: (Lots 760 – 1540)
Sunday 31 May, 2026 – 10.00am AEST

Our recent post with Thomas J. Nevin's cdv of Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch provides further details of the inter-connectedness of the Nevin, Crouch, and Rockwell families: their family farms at Kangaroo Valley (Hobart), their civil service at the Hobart Gaol, and their measures at Wesleyan social reforms. A forthcoming post includes more examples of Thomas Dunn Webb's photography 1868-1870, of his interests in gold, tin and tobacco in Tasmania, examples of Alfred Bock's portraits of the Bayles sisters, and an account of Ellen Bayles' extraordinary wealth acquired over a long lifetime.

Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch's portrait had a similar airing at the two auctions, Sydney Rare Books Auction  in June 2019 and Leski's Auctions in May 2026, with provenance from auctioneer Alexander Renwick's estate. Fortunately it was correctly identified in both instances with the sitter's name Sarah Crouch and the photographer's attribution, T. Nevin - the only one on both counts, as it happened.



Above: Portrait of Sarah Crouch, cdv by Thomas J. Nevin, taken ca. 1867-1871
Item: Carte-de-visite on buff mount, sepia albumen print
Subject: Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch (1806-1876)
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923)
Location: City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart
Verso studio stamp: [blue ink] T. Nevin, late A. Bock, City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart. Further copies can be obtained at any time.
Provenance: estate of the late Alexander Renwick (Ravenswick Auction House)
Per Leski's Auctions, Melbourne, May 2026 online.
Lot closed - Price Realized:$420 [the highest yet for a single T. J. Nevin cdv sold at market]
Estimate: $200 - $300
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection 2026

Addenda
The six carte-de-visite portraits, including the three above - each poorly photographed by the vendor - were all passed in when offered at Invaluable's auction houses website by Sydney Rare Books, in June 2019. Four were claimed to be photographs taken by Thomas J. Nevin of his siblings - three of his young brother William John Nevin and one of sister Mary-Ann. Not one of the three cdv's claimed to be of his brother William John Nevin has yet to surface again at any auction. The other cdv by Burrows was claimed to be a portrait of his wife Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin in 2019 and sold with the misidentification intact in 2026 (see Case 2 above). The only verifiable, authentic item offered in 2019, passed in and successfully acquired by this weblog when offered again at Leski's in May 2026 is the cdv of Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch taken by Thomas J. Nevin ca. 1870.

Where are these cdv's now?



Invaluable Auctions website
Lot 28: John Nevin.
Est: $400 AUD - $600 AUD
Passed
Sydney Rare Book Auctions
Ultimo, Australia
June 29, 2019
Description
A portrait of his younger brother John (1852-1891), by Thomas Nevin, Carte de visite Nevin & Smith, Hobart, 1869. As Constable Nevin, he was duty at the funeral of Truncanini.




Invaluable Auctions website:
Lot 30: John Nevin.
Est: $300 AUD - $500 AUD
Passed
Sydney Rare Book Auctions
Ultimo, Australia
June 29, 2019
Description
A Carte de visite of young John Nevin, c1869 Hobart. No photographic details to reverse.



Invaluable auction website:
Lot 71: John Nevin.
Est: $300 AUD - $500 AUD
Passed
Sydney Rare Book Auctions
Ultimo, Australia
June 29, 2019
Description
A Carte de visite by Thomas Nevin of his younger brother John, c1875 (T. Nevin late A, Bock, Hobart Town to reverse).

Of the six lots offered and passed in at auction by Sydney Rare Books Auctions in June 2019 which were claimed to be by and about Thomas J. Nevin and family members, these three cdv's claimed to be portraits of his brother William John Nevin have yet to resurface. If you know of their whereabouts, please contact us here.

RELATED POSTS main weblog

Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch at Thomas J. Nevin's studio ca. 1867-1871

Photographers Alfred BOCK, Thomas J. NEVIN, and H. H. BAILY
Portraits of Thomas and Sarah (Rothwell) CROUCH 1860s-1870s, and Robert Stanton ROTHWELL ca. 1870
SHOOBRIDGE estate and grave sites, West Hobart, Tasmania

Sarah Rothwell Crouch photo T. Nevin 1868

Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch (1806-1876), cdv by Thomas J. Nevin, ca. 1867-1871
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection 2026

Alfred Bock's sennotypes of Thomas and Sarah Crouch
Alfred K. Bock (1835 -1920) inherited his father Thomas Bock's daguerreotype establishment at 22 Campbell Street Hobart Town in April 1855 and announced his own photographic business. By July 1855 he had moved to Elliston's premises at 78 Liverpool Street, formerly occupied by the photographers Duryea and McDonald where he built a "Crystal Palace" studio and purchased photographic equipment from Ross of London. Financial difficulties ensued, and Bock moved several times.

In 1857 Alfred Bock was at 18 Macquarie Street. But on 6th February, 1858, he was insolvent. Later that year, Bock re-established himself at 140 Elizabeth Street, Hobart Town - a business he called The City Photographic Establishment - and stayed there until 1865 when he was again declared insolvent (Kerr, ed. 1992: 77-78). In late May 1865, Alfred Bock's wife gave birth to a daughter (Mercury, 23 May 1865). This event too may have precipitated Bock's decision to sell up and leave Tasmania.

Financially bruised by a dispute with photographer Henry Frith about the origins and rights to the sennotype process, the stock-in-trade of Bock's studio at the City Photographic Establishment was advertised at auction on August 2nd, 1865. Thomas J. Nevin bought the lease of the studio, the shop, the stock of negatives, camera equipment, backdrops and furniture, including the glass house/gallery installed at the end of the cart path adjacent to the studio, listed as 138½ Elizabeth St. on valuation rolls.

These two fine portraits of Thomas J. Crouch and his wife Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch were produced by Alfred Bock at the City Photographic Establishment in the early 1860s using the method of assemblage called the sennotype process which consisted of two albumen prints sandwiched under glass, the top one waxed for transparency and usually hand-coloured, resulting in blacker shadows and greater tonal range.



Left: Under-Sheriff Thomas. J. Crouch (1805-1890)
Right: Sarah Crouch (1806-1876) nee Rothwell
Sennotypes by Alfred Bock ca 1860
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Collection

Biographical Notes: Sarah and Thomas Crouch
Biographical Notes by Peter Bolger
Australian Dictionary of Biography
Link: https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/crouch-george-stanton-3346

Thomas James Crouch (1805-1890), under-sheriff, was born on 22 October 1805 in London, the eldest son of James Crouch of Hertfordshire and his wife Sarah, née Marston, of Shropshire. His parents had moved to London before their marriage in 1804 at St George's, Hanover Square, and his father was, among other business projects, proprietor of public baths in Cannon Street. Thomas's education at various small city schools was interrupted by ill health and convalescence at Worthing and Barmouth, and he later became clerk to a barrister at Lincoln's Inn. He was friendly with Dudley Fereday, who was appointed sheriff of Van Diemen's Land. Crouch agreed to become his clerk and arrived at Hobart Town in the Phoenix in January 1825. He was a successful clerk in various commissariat offices, specializing in legal matters until he was appointed under-sheriff in 1836; he held the post until he retired on a pension in 1868.

On 20 February 1832 at St David's Cathedral Crouch married Sarah Rothwell, from Limehouse, London, whom he had met when she passed through Hobart as governess to the family of Rev. Joseph Orton. The Crouch family had been Anglican but in 1826 Thomas had become attached to the Wesleyan Methodists and was an active Sunday school teacher. Sarah was also a Wesleyan but their cottage became the lodgings of the missionaries James Backhouse and George Washington Walker, and she adopted Quaker manners and attended their meetings. Crouch helped to initiate the schools of the Hobart Wesleyan circuit and was a trustee of the Melville Street Church for fifty-eight years. With James Bonwick and G. W. Walker he organized the first local temperance society in 1833 and in 1843 signed the pledge. He was a prominent founder of the Tasmanian Temperance Alliance and chaired its 34th annual meeting on the evening of his death on 28 May 1890. He was also a founder of the Hobart Town Benevolent Society in 1860, a committee member for thirty years and its secretary for seventeen years. For many his greatest claim to fame was his part in the recognition and capture of Martin Cash in Hobart in 1843.

Crouch's wife [Sarah Crouch], after seven years of paralysis, died on 16 January 1876 in her seventieth year. She remained loyal to the Society of Friends and was buried in their ground at Providence Valley. Sarah had shared in her husband's religious and temperance activities, organized a female petition for a Maine Liquor Law in the colony and another to forestall Sunday licensing, and served on the committees of the Maternal and Dorcas Society and of various societies such as the Van Diemen's Land Asylum for the Protection of Destitute and Unfortunate Females, which Walker had promoted in 1848. She was one of the Ladies Visiting Committee which each week inspected female paupers at New Town, Cascades and the Brickfields, and was reputed to have kept her own dispensary where she gave medicines to the needy. Perhaps her greatest contribution to the welfare of Hobart poor was her Servants' Home in High Street, which only closed in her final illness.

Crouch and his wife had at least eight children, most of whom died in childhood. One daughter, Mary, was married to Robert S. Caseley, Wesleyan minister in South Australia in 1863, and another, Ann, to Robert Shoobridge in 1871. The eldest son, Thomas James [Crouch], became an architect, designing among other work the General Post Office in Melbourne; there he died on 4 December 1889.

The second son, George Stanton [Crouch] (b. 1 May 1834), was educated like his brother at Bonwick's and Hutchins Schools. They were active in Wesleyan Sabbath school and temperance work at St Kilda after failing at the diggings. George was a farmer at Kangaroo Valley, near Hobart, from 1854 until 1863 when he sailed with his wife for New Zealand. His job at Invercargill as clerk and book-keeper at the Southland News ended in 1870 when he became part-owner of both it and its rival, the Southland Times. In these years he advocated total abstinence and was a prominent Wesleyan. He returned to Hobart in 1871 and ran an auctioneer's salesroom until 1905. In 1883 he was elected alderman of the City of Hobart and served for twelve years, being mayor in 1892, but was prevented from becoming a justice of the peace by his Quaker-like refusal to take the oath. He gained ambivalent repute as the 'Teetotal Mayor' and startled Saturday night revellers by regular inspections of public houses, always with a police bodyguard... [extract]

Source: https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/crouch-george-stanton-3346

The Rothwell and Crouch families were closely involved with the operations of the Sheriff's Office at the Hobart Gaol from the 1830s to the 1880s. Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch's brother, John Rothwell (1812-1885) gained the position of second clerk to the Sheriff in 1836 through her husband's influence, advancing by degrees until he was appointed chief clerk in 1841 and Under-Sheriff in 1868 on the retirement of brother-in-law Thomas J. Crouch, a position he held until retirement, 71 years old, in 1883, having served the office with "fidelity and justice" under Judges Pedder, Montagu, Fleming, Home, Smith, and Dobson, according to his Obituary in the Mercury, 19 Sept 1885. He supervised the execution of Job Smith aka Campbell on 31st May, 1875, at the Hobart Gaol; Thomas J. Nevin's photogaph taken at his only sitting with Job Smith is extant in several public collections, one was even hand-tinted, another was poorly reprinted in the 20th century.

In 1838 John Rothwell married Celia Rebecca Smith in Hobart. Her sister Sarah Anson (d. 1858) was the mother of Hobart photographers Joshua (b. 1821) and John (b. 1835) Anson. John and Celia Rothwell had a large family of children (15 are listed at familysearch.org), and apart from their first-born daughter Sarah who died in 1924, their eighth child, son Robert Stanton Rothwell (1850-1902), Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch's nephew in effect, was the last of their sons still living by 1900. He died of neurosyphilis in 1902 at the New Norfolk Lunatic Asylum. When, as a young man barely 20 years old, he visited the studio of T. D. Webb, St. John's Street, Launceston, Tasmania to be photographed wearing his finest (ca.1870), he dedicated his portrait to Miss Ellen Bayles of Ross, signing it verso "With R.S.R.'s compliments, to Ms E. Bayles, Auburn, Ross".

If the history of ownership of his portrait (below) could be established beyond the 1870s when Ellen Bayles first placed it her family album, some light might be shed as to why this young man, Robert Stanton Rothwell was misidentified by its vendor at Leski's auction (Melbourne) in May 2026 as the brother of photographer Thomas J. Nevin, William John Nevin (1852-1891). While both Nevin brothers worked at the Hobart Gaol from the early 1870s with Under-Sheriff John Rothwell - Thomas as photographer of prisoners who were received, incarcerated and discharged from Supreme Court convictions, and his brother Constable John (W. J. aka Jack to the family) Nevin as warder and messenger - and while the Rothwell, Crouch and Nevin families shared many connections including their respective farms at Kangaroo Valley (Hobart), their Wesleyan faith, Lodge membership and civil service, there is nothing about this carte-de-visite which would invite such a misidentification (more to come in a future post).

Robert Stanton Rockwell 1870

Robert Stanton Rockwell 1870

Portrait of Robert Stanton Rothwell by T. D. Webb, Launceston, Tasmania ca. 1870
Inscribed verso "With R.S.R.'s compliments, to Ms E. Bayles, Auburn, Ross"
Misidentified by vendor at auction (Leski's May 2026) as William John Nevin, brother of photographer T. J. Nevin.
Purchased from Leski's (Melb) for © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection, 31 May 2026.

Departure of Alfred Bock to Victoria



Alfred Bock's trade advertisement in Walch's Tasmanian Almanac, 1864

The City Photographic Establishment and the house next door were premises consisting of two house-and-shop properties owned by Abraham Biggs snr at 138-140 Elizabeth St. Hobart, They were still "unfinished" in 1853 according to the Hobart Valuation Rolls. By 1854 Biggs was listed as the proprietor with his son, builder Abraham Edwin Biggs. By 1857 they had let the premises at 140 Elizabeth St. to photographer Alfred Bock which he operated as a studio with his (step) brother William Bock until 1865. On Alfred Bock's departure to Victoria, commercial photographer and government contractor Thomas J. Nevin continued the business with the firm's name, The City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth Street, Hobart Town. He operated the studio in partnership with Robert Smith under the business name of Nevin & Smith briefly between 1866-68, vacating the shop, residence, glass house and studio a decade later, in 1876, to take up his appointment in full-time civil service with residency at the Hobart Town Hall.

Photographer Thomas J. Nevin was a member of the Loyal United Brothers' Lodge and their official photographer. He was also an affiliate of the Benevolent Society and Wesleyan Church with senior members of the Crouch, Nevin and Genge families. Thomas' father John Nevin snr leased an acre of land from the Wesleyan Trustees of Ancanthe at Kangaroo Valley (Lenah Valley) from the early 1850s and remained there to his death in 1887. His daughter Rebecca Jane Nevin died there in 1865 and his wife Mary Ann (Dickson) Nevin died there in 1875. Eldest son Thomas James Nevin married Elizabeth Rachel Day at the Wesleyan Chapel there in 1871, and his only surviving daughter Mary Ann Nevin married John Carr there in 1877. John Nevin snr also taught class at the Wesleyan Chapel, Kangaroo Valley in 1875. His second marriage in 1879 after the death of his wife in 1875 was to widow Martha (Genge) Salter, daughter of Wesleyan lay preacher William Genge of the Methodist Church and meeting rooms, Melville Street, Hobart. William Genge's death occasioned a poem written as a lament by John Nevin in 1881.

Thomas J. Nevin's portrait of Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch
Thomas J. Nevin stamped his mostly commonly used commercial studio backmark in blue ink on the verso of this carte-de-visite, his portrait of Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch, which would indicate she visited his studio sometime ca. 1867-1871. He used sepia or black ink on later portraits after 1872. See examples here of both backstamps in blue and black ink at the National Gallery of Victoria's collection of eleven (11) cdv's of Nevin's portraits donated by John McPhee in 2020.

Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch was experiencing the early effects of paralysis which would claim her life in 1876 when she visited Nevin's studio. His capture of her facial expression might have unintentionally betrayed the pain she was enduring, and not just from her illness. The tight whalebone corset she was wearing had completely flattened the natural line of her bosom, undoubtedly causing further discomfort.

This is an unusual photograph in that Thomas J. Nevin positioned the sitter closer to his camera than he otherwise seemed to prefer in sittings with women clients. His use of the newer lenses here, which allowed shorter focal range and a larger image of the face and hands without sacrificing clarity, became his trademark when he commenced the photographing of prisoners with Supreme Court convictions on government contract soon after Sarah Crouch's brother John Rothwell succeeded her husband Thomas J. Crouch to the position of Under-Sheriff. This photograph, the first to be printed off the glass negative and like many which Nevin produced at the Hobart Gaol of prisoners for inclusion on their rap sheets, was printed initially with the whole upper body visible. The next print, if requested, would have been the same image formatted as a carte-de-visite, framed in an oval mount, showing the face but not the hands. If this same image of Sarah Crouch was ever produced as a carte-de-visite, it has yet to surface in public or private collections.

Sarah Crouch photo T. Nevin 1868

Sarah Crouch photo T. Nevin 1868Sarah Crouch photo T. Nevin 1868 verso

Above: Portrait of Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch, cdv by Thomas J. Nevin, taken ca. 1867-1871
Item: Carte-de-visite on buff mount, sepia albumen print
Subject: Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch (1806-1876)
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923)
Location: City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart
Verso studio stamp: [blue ink] T. Nevin, late A. Bock, City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart. Further copies can be obtained at any time.
Provenance: estate of the Late Alexander Renwick
Per Leski's Auctions, Melbourne, May 2026 online.
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection 2026

Thomas J. Nevin photographed prisoner George Leathley seated in similar fashion to Sarah Crouch. Both sat with sightlines deflected to right of frame, their faces turned to look past the photographer standing quite close to their left, and each with folded hands resting on their lap. He printed both photographs in rich sepia from the negative, but pasted the full upper-body print of Sarah Crouch to a plain mount, whereas his print of Leathley was produced in carte-de-visite format for police and prison records. One cdv was pasted to the prisoner's rap sheet, another was included in the Photo Books held at the Municipal Police Office, Hobart Town Hall, and others were forwarded to regional and rural police stations wherever the prisoner was sent to work. Although Nevin's original negative taken in the one sitting in the early to mid 1870s was commonly used for further prints if the prisoner was again convicted after release (e.g. Leathley's No.14 printed 1872, reprint in 1874, No. 226), another sitting was required if the negative was too damaged, as was most likely the case with Nevin's second and quite different photograph of George Leathley taken on discharge in 1876.



Left: Prisoner George Leathley
Thomas Nevin's original print from his glass negative, 1874
Reprinted by John Watt Beattie on a panel for sale, 1916
Held at the QVMAG Ref: 1983_p_0163-0176

Right: Prisoner George Leathley No's. 14 and 226
National Library of Australia collection
Title: George Leathley, per ship Blundell
Creator: T. J. Nevin 1874.
Inscription: “Nos. 14 & 226”–On reverse
Taken at the National Library of Australia, Feb. 2015
Photo copyright © KLW NFC Imprint 2016.

THE SERVANTS' HOME
Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch was a committee member of the Maternal and Dorcas Society when she sought subscriptions and donations for the establishment and on-going support of a home for servant girls in High Street, North Hobart. The street was renamed Tasma Street in 1921 to avoid duplication with High Street, Sandy Bay, named after the novelist Jessie Catherine Couvreur, nee Huybers (1848-97), whose pseudonym was "Tasma".

These notices were published in the press at the beginning of Sarah Crouch's campaign in September to November 1856.



Extract, full transcript below:

TRANSCRIPT
SERVANTS' HOME
SEVERAL Ladies having been long impressed with the desolate state of females occupying the sphere of domestic servants on leaving their situations while seeking others, the following ideas have been suggested: -
"That a society of ladies be formed, the design of which shall be to protect ALL lone female servants, and afford such advice as experience dictates and by judicious care and oversight prevent exposure to many evils which strangers in the colony are subject to; and also to provide a "Home" to ALL female servants willing to avail themselves of its privileges at a rate within the reach of their limited means. The "Home" will be conducted as much as possible in accordance with similar Institutions in London.

Such a home will preclude the necessity of the well-intentioned taking up their abode with persons whose object is gain to themselves, though it should be the destruction of their supporters.

With this view the ladies have taken a house in High-street, near the New Town Road (a respectable neighbourhood) at a very moderate rent, in which there is a sitting-room, with table requisites for the use of the inmates, and all necessary utensil for cooking, washing, &c - the dormitories furnished with beds, bedding, and everything necessary to the comfort of those desirous of placing themselves under the guardianship of the ladies.

The ladies feel the time has arrived when such an institute is required, and will be valued in town and country, both by servants and employers. By this provision, when it is known in England and elsewhere, the ladies believe encouragement will be given to the virtuous to emigrate, and the comfort and convenience of the community generally increased, while much vice and its consequent pauperism will be prevented.

The Ladies have great confidence in appealing to the Public for aid in this philanthropic undertaking, feeling assured they will not appeal in vain. There is no doubt the want of such a Home has been lamentably felt by many a friendless girl, who may at this time be pining in poverty and woe; who would have been, under other circumstances, an useful member of society, and an ornament in the station she was designed to fill.

Particulars may be obtained at the "home" or of the undersigned, by whom Subscriptions and Donations will be gratefully received.

S. CROUCH, Secretary. Argyle-street
Servants' "House", High-street. 14th of 10th Month, 1856."

Source: SERVANTS' HOME. (1856, November 1). The Courier (Hobart, Tas. : 1840 - 1859), p. 1.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article2506506

THE RULES No's. 1-5:



FEMALE SERVANTS' HOME, HIGH -STREET. (1856, November 26).
The Tasmanian Daily News (Hobart Town, Tas. : 1855 - 1858), p. 3.
Source: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article202389475

TRANSCRIPT
Female Servants' Home, High-street.
Various rumours being abroad as to the conditions on which servants are admitted into the " home," the committee have determined to publish the rules for the information of the public generally, and at the same time to thank those ladies and gentlemen both in town and country who have come forward so kindly and generously with subscriptions to aid in establishing this institution.
The rules to be observed by the inmates of the servants'-" home."
1st. Admission rule— Each person must produce her own character.
She must also signify her intention to conform to the following rules by signing them in a book kept for that purpose.
2nd. That each person so admitted must pay to the housekeeper three shillings per week (in advance) which will entitle her to a bed, the use of the fire, and other necessaries for cooking, washing, &., with the accommodation of the sitting room.
3rd. That each person will be required to deposit one shilling with the housekeeper, which sum will be returned on her leaving the establishment, provided nothing is destroyed which was appropriated to her individual use.
4th. In the event of any female leaving before her week is expired, so much of the three shillings will be returned as will amount to the payment of sixpence each night she shall have occupied the lodging.
5th. The doors of the building will be closed at nine o'clock, when each person is expected to be in, and the lights out at ten o'clock. No intoxicating drinks will be allowed on the premises ; but no further restraint will be used, or undue influence exercised in the choice of situation or otherwise.

S. Crouch, Secretary.

N.B.— Any inmate preferring to take her meals off the housekeeper can procure either at nine pence per meal.

FEMALE SERVANTS' HOME, HIGH -STREET. (1856, November 26).
The Tasmanian Daily News (Hobart Town, Tas. : 1855 - 1858), p. 3.
Source: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article202389475

H. H. Baily's portrait of Sarah (Rothwell) Crouch
One way of looking at this photograph is to see it as a piece of cardboard on which is printed an image. Perhaps it has commercial value only because of age, condition, and provenance. Another way is to step into the scene and participate as the photographer might while talking to his sitter. Still another way is to trace the journey of each element in the picture from any known context in which it has appeared up to the present, in which case the familiar object in this portrait of Sarah Crouch by H. H. Baily is the carpet with a pattern of large dark lozenges rimmed in white. It was formerly used by Alfred Bock as one of his studio carpets, then by Thomas Nevin for one of several set-ups for taking portraits in the same studio in 1868, and finally the same carpet was used in this portrait of Sarah Crouch by Henry Hall Baily, that is, if he photographed her before her death in 1876. Note that Sarah Crouch wore her velvet jacket over her dress for her sitting in the Alfred Bock and H. H. Baily photographs, but had taken it off for her sitting with Thomas J. Nevin.

On the other hand, is this just a piece of cardboard which was reprinted by Henry Hall Baily from an original capture taken by Alfred Bock before 1865; then reprinted by Thomas Nevin, operating as Nevin & Smith between 1865-1868; or, later, reprinted by Thomas Nevin again from 1868-1875 when both Bock's stock and Nevin's negatives were reprinted by Samuel Clifford to 1878; and lastly, reprinted by Henry Hall Baily ca. 1880? Reprints were mostly at the request of the client and family. All three photographers - Alfred Bock, Samuel Clifford, and Henry Hall Baily - were close friends and colleagues of Thomas J. Nevin from the early 1860s to his retirement in 1888. To further complicate matters of copying, from the early 1860s the source of their studio carpets, tables, drapes and backsheets was the family warehouse of Charles A. Woolley, the most senior photographer of their Hobart cohort. His studio furnishings and photographic paraphernalia were passed around among members of that cohort when times were hard, which was more often than not.



Photograph of Sarah Crouch,
University of Tasmania Library Special and Rare Materials Collection
Link: https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7214/
Photograph of Sarah Crouch, wife of Thomas James Crouch, under sheriff of Van Diemen's Land. The photographer was Henry Hall Baily who had studios in Elizabeth and Liverpool Streets, Hobart from 1865-1918.



Verso: Photograph of Sarah Crouch
University of Tasmania Library Special and Rare Materials Collection
Link: https://eprints.utas.edu.au/7214/



Woolley's Carpets and Upholstery Warehouse, Macquarie St.
Series: Photographs and Glass Plate Negatives collected by E R Pretyman (NS1013)
Archives Tasmania Ref: NS1013_1_1895

Providence Valley Burial Ground
In 1836 the Society of Friends (Quakers) established a cemetery on ground purchased from William Shoobridge's Providence Valley Farm. Sarah Crouch was buried there in 1876, so too was her husband Thomas Crouch in 1890. About 60 people, including members of the Propsting, Mather, Benson, Bell, Rowntree and Walker families used the cemetery until its closure in 1912. The former burial ground is now called the Friends' Park, Hill Street. The headstones of Sarah Crouch and others were retained and displayed around the park's perimeter.

Sarah Crouch tomsbstone Tasmania

Gravestone of Sarah Rothwell Crouch at Providence Valley Farm
Source: UTAS, eprints.utas.edu



Friends' Park
Source: G. Ritchie, photos and text
Link: https://ontheconvicttrail.blogspot.com/2014/04/friends-park-west-hobart.html
Friends Park is a small park in West Hobart that started life as a burial ground for the Society of Friends (Quakers). The land had originally been granted to William Shoobridge in the early 1820's and he had set up a farming enterprise. Although Shoobridge was a practicing Methodist, he found himself supporting the work of a number of Quaker missionaries who had visited Van Diemen's Land in the early 1830's. As a show of his support, he agreed to give the Society of Friends a half acre portion of his farm land in order for the Society to establish a burial grounds for themselves. As it turned out, following the establishment of the burial ground, Shoobridge himself became the first person to be buried there after he passed away in 1836.

The burial ground continued to provide for the Quakers into the 1900's. Even after the Cornelian Bay cemetery was opened in 1872 and many of Hobart's numerous suburban burial grounds were closed, the Society of Friends burial ground was able to continue operating because it fell outside the Hobart municipal boundary. Following the rezoning of the region into the new Greater Hobart municipality, the burial ground was finally closed in 1908.

It just remained as an unused burial ground until 1937 when the Hobart City Council negotiated with the Friends Society for the transfer of the land to the council so that it could be converted to a community recreation space for the growing West Hobart community.

Under the terms of the transfer agreement, the park was to be renamed Friends Park and the headstones were to be repositioned and re-erected around the walls of the new park. This was subsequently completed and the newly named Friends Park has continued to provide the local community with a beautiful recreational space. One with a very interesting past.

Source: https://ontheconvicttrail.blogspot.com/2014/04/friends-park-west-hobart.html

The Nevin and Shoobridge families
Shortly before Thomas J. Nevin's death in 1923 at his home, 270 Elizabeth St. Hobart, his eldest daughter known as May Nevin (1872-1955) made arrangements with her close friend Winifred Shoobridge, daughter of Annie Crouch and Richard Shoobridge, grand daughter of William Shoobridge of Providence Valley, to move with her brothers George, William, and Albert into the property at No's 23-29 Newdegate St., or Queen Street as it was then called until 1925, formerly Providence Valley, where they would remain until the death of May Nevin in 1955. Her other two siblings - Minnie Drew nee Nevin and Tom "Sonny" Nevin - were both married and living elsewhere by 1907. Each of the four remaining adult siblings set up a business on the Newdegate St. property: May did dressmaking; George sold vegetables from the garden; William ran a furniture removal business, and Albert trained a stable of pacers. In 1925 Queen Street was renamed Newdegate Street after Governor Sir Francis Newdegate (1917-1920) to avoid duplication with Queen Street, Sandy Bay.



The house at 23 Newdegate St. North Hobart, formerly Queen St. and Providence Valley (on the Shoobridge estate).Children of Albert Nevin, grandchildren of Thomas J. Nevin and Elizabeth Rachel Nevin nee Day out front, 1930s.
Signage of W. J. Nevin, carrier, son of Thomas and Elizabeth Nevin at left.
Copyright © KLW NFC 2006-2009 Private Collection ARR.



Metropolitan Drainage Board Map. No. 58 ca. 1908
The property 23-29 Newdegate St. formerly Queen St. where Thomas and Elizabeth Nevin's adult children settled from c 1923 to the late 1950s.
Queen St. North Hobart was renamed Newdegate St. after Governor of Tasmania Francis Newegate (1917-1920).
Source: Archives Office of Tasmania Ref: 628270



No. 23 Newdegate St. North Hobart Tasmania
The units on either side of the house and cottage were built with the sale of part of the property in the 1960s.
Google maps 2019

Updated 29 August 2026
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint 2020-2026


RELATED POSTS main weblog