Showing posts with label Private Collections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Private Collections. Show all posts

Lost originals: the Nevin, Genge and Chandler family photographs

ARCHIVAL DEPOSITS of COPIES only of original 19th century photographs, Tasmania
THE LOST COLLECTIONS of NEVIN, GENGE, CHANDLER and HOOPER family photographs
INTERGENERATIONAL PHOTOGRAPHERS Thomas J. NEVIN 1870s, and JAMES CHANDLER 1900s

The Chandler and Hooper Collection
Photographer James Chandler (1877-1945) acquired by descent an unknown number of original photographic works taken by his mentor and older "cousin-in-law" photographer Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923). The early photographs passed hands from Thomas and Elizabeth Nevin's daughter Minnie Drew nee Nevin (1884-1974) and James Chandler (1877-1945) to James' Chandler's nephew Victor L. Hooper (1905-1990). The Archives Office of Tasmania has this collection catalogued thus:
James Chandler (b. Hobart 1877) was a Hobart based photographer. For many years he was a member of the Photographic Society and well-known on the Hobart waterfront as a marine photographer in the 1930s and 1940s. He was the youngest son of William Chandler, a bootmaker, and his wife Mary (nee Genge), the first couple married at the New Town Methodist Church on the 14 Jan 1868. His uncle was Jacob Chandler, a ship builder in Battery Point. He died in Hobart on 8 July 1945.
NS434 Photographs of the Chandler, Genge and Hooper Families 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1960
NS869 Photographs of General and Maritime Interest 01 Jan 1870 31 Dec 1950
NS1231 Photographs of Hobart and Suburbs, Port Arthur and Ships 01 Jan 1910 31 Dec 1940
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NG1231
Vic (Victor Leonard) Hooper had a large collection of photographs many of which were taken by his Uncle James Chandler, a Hobart marine photographer. Mr Hooper was cremated at Cornelian Bay, Hobart on the 30 Sept 1990, aged 85. He lived at Mount Stuart and then New Town.
NS434 Photographs of the Chandler, Genge and Hooper Families 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1960
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS434

On Wednesday 10th November 1926 James Chandler, Hon. Secretary of the Southern Tasmanian Photographic Society, gave a lecture with "views" - lantern slides perhaps, or prints and originals - of the early history of Hobart, most likely with the aid of photographs inherited from his recently deceased mentor and "cousin-in-law" Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923).
SOUTHERN TASMANIAN PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
A special meeting of the Southern Tasmanian Photographic Society was held on Wednesday night for the purpose of forming an historical section of the society. Mr. F.G. Robinson was in the chair. After the proposed activities of the section had been discussed, it was resolved that an historical section be formed. The following officers were appointed: Chairman, Mr. F.G. Robinson; Hon. Secretary, Mr. J. Chandler.

At the conclusion of the business, a lecture on "Early Hobart" was given by Mr. J. Chandler, who gave a good description of the early history of Hobart. The views shown comprised a record of the growth of Hobart from about 1820 to 1880. A vote of thanks was accorded the lecturer.
Source: PHOTOGRAPHIC SOCIETY. (1926, November 12). The Mercury
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article29465630

Obituary for James Chandler, 30 March 1945:
Mr J. Chandler. The funeral of Mr James Chandler, who died at a private hospital at Hobart on Tuesday, took place at the Cornelian Bay crematorium on Wednesday. The service was conducted by the Rev Gordon Arthur. Chief mourners were Mrs E. M. Hooper (sister), Messrs R. W. and V. Hooper (nephews), Misses C. A. and D. Hooper, Mesdames E. Bennett. R. J. Collins, (nieces), Messrs. R. J. Collins, H. Genge, B. Genge, and Max Inches.
Mr Chandler was for many years a member of the Photographic Society and was well known on the Hobart waterfront. He was a keen photographer. He was the youngest son of the late William and Mary Chandler, who were the first couple married at New Town Methodist Church. His father was a bootmaker in Hobart for many years, and an uncle, Jacob Chandler, was a ship builder at Battery Pt., and built a number of early river steamers.
Mr J. Chandler (1945, March 30). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 – 1954), p. 16.
https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article26058706

James Chandler was living on the property owned by his older half-brother Henry Chandler at McRobies Valley when he died on 8th July 1945 (probate reg. March 1946). The Archives Office of Tasmania holds a sizeable collection of his marine and landscape photographic works, several now online at Flickr, for example: -



Mt Wellington view of Hobart from scenic lookout - c1930s
James Chandler, Photographer (NG1231)12 Aug 1877 08 Jul 1945
Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office: NS869/1/349
Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/107895189@N03/albums/72157638491468735



Photograph - Ferry 'Kangaroo' - aground
Item Number: NS434/1/162
Date: 1926
Source: Archives Office of Tasmania
Creating Agency: Hooper Family (NG434) 01 Jan 1920
James Chandler, Photographer (NG1231)12 Aug 1877 08 Jul 1945
Series: Photographs of the Chandler, Genge and Hooper Families (NS434)

This is probably the last photograph ever taken of the steam twin vehicular ferry "Kangaroo" built by Elizabeth Rachel Nevin's uncle Captain Edward Goldsmith in 1854-1855 at his patent slipyard on the Queen's Domain in Hobart. It was sold to Askin Morrison in 1857, then to James Staines Taylor in 1864 who operated it for the next 40 years. It was still in operation well into the first decades of the 20th century. Bought by the O'May Bros in 1903, its service was terminated in 1925 and replaced by the "Lurgerena" in 1926.

A boy and his photograph: no longer "Anon"
Item no. NS434-1-121 - "Photograph - Anon - boy - c. 1870s" from the series "NS434 Photographs of the Chandler, Genge and Hooper Families 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1960" was listed online at the Archives Office of Tasmania but without the digitised image when a Nevin family descendant recently requested a preview and scan. It was a stab in the dark, a random choice from the two dozen family photographs of the Nevin, Genge, and Chandler families from the Chandler/Hooper collection, more so since neither the "boy" nor the photographer was named.

The scan provided by the AOT revealed this fine portrait of a very handsome eleven year old boy in uniform, immediately identifiable as a portrait taken by Thomas J. Nevin ca. 1871 at his studio and business, the City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town, Tasmania. The Archives Office has since placed the image online, listed as "Photograph - Anon - boy - c. 1870s" despite information we have since provided as to the identity of the photographer, if not the name of the boy's family (viz: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS434-1-121).



Subject: Unidentified 11 year-old boy, possibly George Chandler b. 1860
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923)
Location and date: City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart, Tasmania, 1871
Format: carte de visite housed in a tin frame, studio decor items typically used by Nevin in early 1870s.
Details: Copy from negative made from collection lent to the Archives Office of Tasmania in 1974
Item catalogued as "Photograph - Anon - boy - c. 1870s"
Location and condition of original photograph and frame unknown.
Provenance: Series: Photographs of the Chandler, Genge and Hooper Families (NS434) 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1960
Source: Archives Office of Tasmania - https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS434-1-121
NB: slightly colorised for display here from the black and white digital copy supplied by AOT.



Verso: "Anon" is pencilled on back of paper print of this cdv taken by Thomas J. Nevin ca. 1871.
Archives Office of Tasmania.
Source: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS434-1-121
Photographs of the Chandler, Genge and Hooper Families
Series Number: NS434
Access: Open
Start Date: 01 Jan 1860
End Date: 31 Dec 1960
Source: Tasmanian Archives
Creating Agency: Hooper Family (NG434) 01 Jan 1920
James Chandler, Photographer (NG1231) 12 Aug 1877 08 Jul 1945
Series notes: Copies of originals only. Original photographs lent to the Archives Office of Tasmania by Mr Hooper in 1974 to be copied. The collection includes predominantly photographs of the Chandler, Genge and Hooper families, but also some of Beaumaris Zoo, Hobart and other views. These records are part of the holdings of the Tasmanian Archives.

Information supplied by the Archives Office along with the request and the scan proved disappointing, apart from the fact that the scan they were providing was a copy of a copy. Nothing was known about the location of the original photograph from which this copy was made when it was deposited there in 1974 on Minnie Drew's death.
This item is a copy of a photograph in a frame lent to the Archives Office by the owner for photographing back in 1974. We made negatives at the time, and your copy is printed from a negative. As for the back of the photograph, on the back is written ‘anon’, and nothing else.
From: Response to information by email from Archives Office of Tasmania, email 14 October 2021

Just copies printed from negatives of originals lent to the Archives Office of Tasmania - NOT scans of the originals of photographs from the early 1870s of the Nevin, Genge and Chandler families - are all that the Archives Office of Tasmania (AOT) can offer from this collection. The negatives were made in 1974 when they were "lent" by Victor Hooper from the estate of Minnie Drew nee Nevin (1884-1974), daughter of photographer Thomas J. Nevin and Elizabeth Rachel Nevin. None had been digitized by the AOT of any of the early 1860s-1870s photographs that might have been taken by Thomas J. Nevin among the items inherited by Minnie Drew from her parents.

Apart from the 1870s photographs, a number of photographs in this collection are studio photographs taken in the 1890s and later of family members at Launceston and Hobart studios, mostly inherited by Victor Hooper from the estate of his uncle James Chandler (1877-1945) who would become a professional photographer. James Chandler was Thomas Nevin's successor to professional photography, his young "cousin-in-law". He was the son of shoe maker William Chandler and Mary Chandler nee Genge, William's second wife. He was the nephew of Mary Genge's sister Martha Nevin formerly Salter nee Genge, who became the second wife of Thomas Nevin's father, John Nevin snr (1808-1887) in 1879.

The copying of the originals in the collection was arranged for deposit at the Archives of Tasmania in 1974 by Victor Hooper of the funeral firm Hooper & Burgess. As a funeral director and as a nephew of photographer James Chandler, he was not only the organiser of his relative Minnie Drew's funeral in 1974, he was the owner by descent of the whole photographic collection. The original photographs from the original collection appear not to have been purchased or otherwise acquired by the Archives Office from Vic Hooper's estate when he died in 1990. We can only assume therefore that these original photographs of the Nevin, Genge, Chandler and Hooper families are now altogether lost, unless someone somewhere knows something to the contrary (please contact us here).

Identifying the photographer
Even if the identity of boy in this cdv was unknown at first glance, with no information other than the word "Anon" faintly inscribed on the verso, the photographer was immediately identifiable as Thomas J. Nevin from elements which featured in many of his portraits of private clientele from the late 1860s to the early 1870s, viz:

1. the carpet or tapis with lozenge and chain link pattern
2. the table with the griffin-shaped legs
3. the flowers and silver vase (flowers possibly tinted)
4. the drape (possibly tinted dark red)
5. the backsheet of a tiled Italianate balcony and balustrade overlooking a wide cart path beside a stream meandering to low mountains at the horizon.

These elements provided the decor for several portraits taken by Thomas J. Nevin at his studio ca. 1871-1873, but this original and rare cdv of an unidentified woman (below) in particular features the distinctive vase with flowers (tinted in the original) identical with the vase in the cdv of the boy:



Subject: Unidentified woman in black dress, seated on a slipper chair, left arm resting on a table adorned with a book and vase holding flowers, tinted.
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923)
Location and date: 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart, Tasmania, ca. 1871
Scans courtesy and copyright © The Private Collection of C. G. Harrisson 2006.

This unidentified woman posed for a full length carte-de-visite portrait sitting on Nevin' shiny slipper chair at his table with the griffin-shaped legs. As the same carpet appears in the photograph taken of Thomas J. Nevin and Elizabeth Rachel Day on their wedding day, 12 July 1871, this portrait can be dated ca. 1871-1873. The verso bears Thomas Nevin's most common commercial studio stamp, an elaboration of the stamp used by former lessee of the studio, Alfred Bock.



Verso studio stamp: "T. Nevin late A. Bock, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town"



Detail of above: tinted flowers yellow and rose

A consistent feature of Thomas Nevin's cartes-de-visite taken of private clients and family members at his studio, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town circa 1871 is delicate hand-tinting. The detail (above) of the flower arrangement shows a fine touch. Given the similarities with the vase in both cdvs, there is a slight chance this woman was a relative of the boy, in which case, both photographs were most likely taken in the same session.

Identifying the boy
Since the date when these elements were a feature of Nevin's studio decor, the boy in this photograph was possibly George Chandler, born a twin with Elizabeth Chandler on 24th November 1860 to William Chandler's first wife, Kezia Cox. The female twin Elizabeth died in 1862, aged 15 months.

George Chandler would have been 11 or 12 years old when he visited Thomas J. Nevin's studio for this photograph in 1871. To the 21st century viewer, he appears to be formally dressed in a plain suit with white shirt, dark tie and shiny shoes. The bulge in the back of his jacket is mysterious, a satchel perhaps, or even a shortened headrest designed to hold children steady. The hat in his right hand has a leather visor, possibly part of a schoolboy's or postal apprentice's uniform. Posed standing and slightly turned to his right, his gaze and smile towards the photographer might even suggest he found the encounter pleasing and fascinating. The intricate frame in which the family placed this cdv of George Chandler looks like pressed tin rather than carved wood. However, this is just a black and white copy of a black and white copy of the original, so other aspects such as the watermarks on the back wall are not easily explained. The flowers in the original may have been tinted; they may have been the very same flowers only seen previously in the cdv of the woman (above).



Detail of "Photograph - Anon - boy - c. 1870s"
https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS434-1-121



Subject: Unidentified 11 year-old boy, possibly George Chandler born 1860.
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923)
Location and date: City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart, Tasmania, 1871
Format: carte de visite housed in a tin frame, studio decor items typically used by Nevin in early 1870s.
Details: Copy from negative made from collection lent to the Archives Office of Tasmania in 1974
Item catalogued as "Photograph - Anon - boy - c. 1870s"
Location and condition of original photograph and frame unknown.
Provenance: Series: Photographs of the Chandler, Genge and Hooper Families (NS434) 01 Jan 1860 31 Dec 1960
Source: Archives Office of Tasmania - https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS434-1-121
NB: slightly colorised for display here from the black and white digital copy supplied by AOT.

Given the textual similarities of this cdv and the cdv of the unidentified woman (above), there is a slight chance she was a relative of the boy, in which case, both photographs were most likely taken together on the same day, and her presence might therefore suggest she was George Chandler's step-mother Mary Chandler nee Genge (1835–1923). If so, she would have been 36 years old in 1871.

George Chandler's mother Kezia Chandler nee Cox, was William Chandler's first wife. Kezia Cox married William Chandler (1825-1907) on 31 May 1855 and bore him four (4) children while living at Wilmot St. near Hampden Road, Battery Point where William operated his bootmaker's shop:

1856: William James Chandler born April 14th 1856.
1858: Henry Bayley Chandler (known as Harry) b. n.d.
1860: Twins - George Chandler and Elizabeth Chandler born on 24 November 1860.



3932 Chandler, Elizabeth, female
3933 Chandler, George, male
Record Type: Births
Chandler, William, father
Cox, Kezia mother
Date of birth: 24 Nov 1860
Registered: Hobart
Record ID:NAME_INDEXES:965451
Resource:RGD33/1/8 no 3932 and 3933
Archives Office of Tasmania
Source: https://stors.tas.gov.au/NI/965451

The twin girl, Elizabeth Chandler died of diarrhea at Battery Point at 15 months on 20th February 1862. Her death was registered by a friend, Elizabeth Clark. It is now clear from this information lately provided by Nicole Mays, descendant of Jacob Bayly Chandler (pers. comm, 3 May 2022) , that William's wife, Kezia Chandler nee Cox died in 1865, and that their son George settled in New Zealand where he died in 1922:
William Chandler, his wife Kezia (nee Cox) and their two surviving children (Henry Bayly and George) emigrated from Hobart to Invercargill, New Zealand, travelling on board the barque Eucalyptus on 12 November 1862.

William went on to re-establish himself as a shoemaker in New Zealand, also importing boots and leather from Hobart. Sadly, two melancholy events deeply affected his ability to stay in New Zealand. His business was partly destroyed by fire in late 1864 and, more personally, his wife Kezia died the following year. She was reported to be 38 years old.

William remained in New Zealand only for a short time and returned to Hobart with his two sons in early 1866. The trio travelled on board the SS South Australian which left Hokitika on 1 March of that year, arriving at Melbourne six days later....

George Chandler later returned to New Zealand where he settled. He married Mary Kate Avenell at the Wesleyan Church, Devonport, New Zealand, on 25 April 1889. The couple had three children: Grace, Olive and William Eric. George died at Rotorua, New Zealand in 1922. Many of the photos in the NS434 collection appear to relate to a trip that George, Kate and their two young daughters took to Hobart in the early 1900s.
Information courtesy of Nicole Mays, pers. comm. 3 May 2022

William Chandler's shoe business Battery Point 1860s

W. Chandler's store, Wilmot Street, (off Hampden Road) Hobart c 1880s
Photographer: possibly half stereo, T. J Nevin 1880s
Item: NS869-1-455_2 Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS869-1-455
Archives Office Tasmania

Shoemaker William Chandler (1825-1907) married his second wife Mary Genge (1835–1923) on 14 January 1868. Mary Genge bore three children in this marriage. When her first child Ethel Chandler was born in 1869, they were resident at William's new business address, 271 Elizabeth St. Hobart, but when James Chandler was born in 1877, they were resident at Thomas Nevin's former studio, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart.

1869: Ethel Mary Chandler born 20 May 1869.
1874: Arthur William Chandler, b. (?) baptism 4 Nov 1877, died 3 yrs old
1877: James Chandler born 12 August 1877.

The surviving children of William Chandler's first marriage to Kezia Cox - George, Henry and William Chandler jnr - were James Chandler's older half-brothers.

James Chandler (1877-1945) was born in August 1877 at Thomas J. Nevin's former photographic studio, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart. Hardly predictable but ultimately not altogether surprising is that he grew up to become a professional photographer. His father William Chandler had acquired the lease from owner John Henry Elliott on Thomas Nevin's appointment to the civil service with residency at the Hobart Town Hall in 1876. William Chandler snr operated a shoe-making business at Nevin's old studio up until 1890, when he moved with his son James to premises at 39 Liverpool St. Hobart.

The Nevin, Genge and Chandler family network
The common affiliation of these three families was the Wesleyan church. Irish born John Nevin snr (1808-1887), journalist, poet and former soldier of the Royal Scots First Regiment with service in the West Indies and Canada, had arrived on the convict transport Fairlie in July 1852 as a pensioner guard with his family - wife Mary Ann nee Dickson, and four children under 12 years - Thomas James, Rebecca Jane, Mary Ann and William John. He leased an acre of land at Kangaroo Valley (Hobart, now Lenah Valley) from the Trustees of the Wesleyan Church on which he settled his family in 1854. John Nevin snr maintained the Wesleyan Chapel and schoolhouse there until his death in 1887. His second marriage, on the death of his wife Mary Ann Nevin (nee Dickson) in 1875, was to Martha Genge (1833-1925) (formerly Salter) in 1879, the widowed daughter of his close friend William Genge, preacher and stone mason of the Wesleyan Church in Melville St. Hobart. Martha's sister was Mary Chandler nee Genge, mother of James Chandler (1877-1945) who would become Thomas J. Nevin's successor to the vocation of photography within the extended family network at the turn of the 20th century.

William Chandler (1825-1907), bootmaker from Dover, Kent, arrived at Hobart on the Calcutta in October 1846 accompanied by his sister Mary Selina Chandler to join their brother, boat builder Jacob Bayly Chandler (see below, Nicole Mays, 2011:65). Jacob Bayley Chandler married Martha Macbeth in 1861. She died aged 38, in 1867, daughter of Peter Macbeth. William Chandler and Mary Genge married at the new Wesleyan Church on New Town Road, Hobart in 1868.

William Genge snr, Wesleyan preacher and stonemason had arrived in Hobart from Liverpool on the Prompt, 768 tons, on 3 July 1857, as a bounty immigrant of 214 in total, bringing his wife, four sons (glovers by trade) and one daughter, Mary Genge (1835-1923) leaving behind his other daughter, Martha Genge (Mercury, 3 July 1857, p. 2). Martha arrived two decades later, by then a widow (formerly Salter). She sailed from Plymouth (UK) on 21st June 1878 on board the Somersetshire. She disembarked at Melbourne (Victoria) and boarded the Tamar for Hobart Town, arriving on 16th August 1878 (Edward Freeman, agents). She was listed as an immigrant, 43 yrs old, without children, a Wesleyan who could read and whose stated qualification was "needlewoman". She was born in Taunton, Somersetshire, England, to William Genge, her father who was already resident in Hobart, the sponsor who paid the bounty of £16 for her ticket (No. 215). His application was signed off by B. Travers Solly on 16th August 1878, and forwarded to Treasury on 22nd August 1878. One year later, Martha Salter nee Genge married John Nevin snr on 23 October 1879 at the Wesleyan Chapel Melville Street Hobart Tasmania. Her sister Mary Genge had married bootmaker William Chandler at the Wesleyan church, New Town, in 1868. With these marriages and religious affiliations, the Nevin, Genge and Chandler families developed interdependent lives.



Martha Nevin, formerly Salter, nee Genge (1833-1925)
Tasmanian Archives and Heritage Office
TAHO Ref: NS434/1/194 copy
Original photos by Thomas J. Nevin taken at his New Town studio October 1879
Photo taken at the Archives Office Tasmania. Copyright © KLW NFC 2012

On Thomas Nevin's appointment to the civil service as Office and Hall Keeper of the Hobart Town Hall in 1876, the lease on his photographic studio was taken over by William Chandler who established his shoe-making business there. The proprietor of the premises at 140 Elizabeth St., formerly Nevin's photographic studio and before him, Alfred Bock's, was John Henry Elliott of Brown St. in 1875 when Nevin advertised the lease. John Elliott was also the proprietor of the hotel next door, the "Royal Standard", at 142 Elizabeth St. on the corner of Patrick and Elizabeth Streets. His daughter Dora Tryphena Elliott was married to Alfred Pedder, the collector of a number of portraits and stereographs taken by Thomas J. Nevin, which were donated to the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery in the 1970s.



Mary Chandler (nee Genge) and baby Jim, i.e. James Chandler 1878
Archives Office Tasmania
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS434-1-144

William Chandler purchased property at New Town in 1877 but continued with the lease for his shoe-making business at Thomas Nevin's studio when his son James aka "Jim" Chandler was born on 12th August 1877 to Mary Chandler (nee Genge), William Chandler's second wife. In 1886, when the street numbers in Elizabeth Street were changed, William Chandler's shoe-making business at 140 Elizabeth St. became 170 Elizabeth St. and the public-house on the corner of Patrick St., the "Royal Standard", formerly 142 Elizabeth became 172 Elizabeth St. Hobart (Tasmanian Gazette, Hobart Valuation Rolls, Archives Office Tasmania).

The street numbers in Elizabeth Street have changed again since Thomas Nevin's former studio, originally at 140 Elizabeth St. in the 1860s-1870s became 170 Elizabeth St. in 1886. Sometime before 1915, 170 Elizabeth St. became 198 Elizabeth St., still three doors from the corner of Patrick Street, and still occupied by bootmakers, viz. William Hawksford in 1915, and H. Bratt, boot repairer, in 1948. The same property at 198 Elizabeth St. is now occupied by the Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre.

1948 Wise's Tasmanian Directory
198 Elizabeth St Bratt H c. bt repr
200 Elizabeth St Thurston Phil H
200 Elizabeth St Thurston Mrs E M, mix business
. . . . . . . . Patrick st ....... .

Source: Wise's Tasmanian Directory
https://stors.tas.gov.au/AUTAS001126438076

By 1890, William Chandler and his teenage son James Chandler were living at the house and shop at 39 Liverpool St. Hobart (J. P. Rowe owner, Victoria). James Chandler established his photography business at 30 Argyle St. Hobart on his father's death in 1907.



James Chandler's photographic studio and shop
30 Argyle St. Hobart 1900s
Archives Office Tasmania
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS1231-2-14

Although Thomas J. Nevin retired from professional photography in 1888 with the birth of his last child Albert Edward Nevin (1888-1955), the family's birth, death and marriage (BDM) documents indicate he was still active as a photographer into the 1920s. Documents dated right up to his death in 1923 state "Occupation: Photographer." His burial certificate of 1923 carries the same vocational title - "Photographer". The witnesses to the marriage of his daughter Minnie Nevin (1884-1974) to James Henry Alfred Drew in 1907, whether himself or another family member, completed the section of the marriage certificate requiring the bride's father's name and his occupation as - "Thomas Nevin Photographer". Ten years later, in 1917, the signatories to the marriage certificate of his youngest son Albert Edward Nevin - i.e. John and Frances Davis, parents of Albert's bride Emily Maud Davis (1898-1971) - registered Albert's father Thomas Nevin's occupation as "Photographer". Family members who readily documented his occupation on these BDM forms would have informed the Registrar otherwise, had it not been the case that Thomas J. Nevin snr was still working in his profession.

While the sons of Thomas Nevin's contemporaries in his photographer cohort - Henry Hall Bailey and Stephen Spurling, for example - carried on the family business into the 20th century, Thomas and Elizabeth Nevin's four adult sons - Tom (Thomas James Nevin jnr aka Sonny), George, William and Albert - showed a preference for thoroughbred-training and racing over photography as a vocation. Thomas J. Nevin snr looked to James Chandler as the beneficiary of his photographic expertise. He was thirty-three (33) years older than James Chandler, a sort of "older cousin" by virtue of the marriage late in life of his father John Nevin snr to James' aunt Martha Nevin (formerly Salter nee Genge) sister of his mother Mary Chandler. Ironically, Thomas' eldest son, Tom or Sonny Nevin took to shoe-making which was the occupation of James' father William Chandler. The sons of these two families effectively swapped their fathers' occupations as their own paths to follow.

Thomas J. Nevin resided at 270 Elizabeth St. (North) Hobart with his wife Elizabeth Rachel Day and eldest daughter May Nevin (1872-1955) in his final years at the premises once occupied by William Genge and managed by his sons Thomas and James Genge, former neighbours at Kangaroo Valley. When William Genge died on the 16th January 1881, at 78 years old of apoplexy and paralysis, John Nevin wrote and published a heart-felt lament on the death of his friend who - by dint of John Nevin's marriage at 75 years old to William's daughter Martha Genge at 46 years old - was also his father-in-law, though both men were born in 1808. William's son Thomas Genge purchased John Nevin snr's land grant of ten acres at Cradoc, near Cygnet, south of Hobart in 1882 five years  before John Nevin's death in his beloved garden at Kangaroo Valley in 1887.



Photographer: James Chandler
Archives Office of Tasmania Ref: NS434/1/103
Martha Nevin nee Genge (left) and her sister Mary Chandler nee Genge (right) at Mt Stuart, Hobart, ca. 1910-1920.

Addenda 1: Genge family
William GENGE (1808–1881) was born on 20 October 1808 at Norton, Sub Hamdon, Somerset (UK) and died on 17 January 1881 at Hobart, Tasmania. His wife Mary Genge nee SLADE (1807–1891) was born on 13 March 1807 at Chiselborough, Somerset England and died on 29 July 1891 at Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.



William Genge and Mary Genge nee Slade, 1870s
Hobart, Tasmania. Unattributed.

Photo copyright and courtesy of © Louise Genge, Private Collection.

1851: UK CENSUS
Father: William Genge was 42 yrs old, a stone cutter and local Wesleyan preacher
Mother: Mary nee Slade (his wife) was 45 yrs old, a glover
Son: John Genge was 21 years old, a stone-cutter
Son: Joseph Genge was 19 years old, a pauper
Daughter: Martha Genge was 17 yrs old, a glover
Daughter: Mary Genge was 15 yrs old, a glover.
Son: Thomas Genge was 10 years old
Son: David Genge was 6 years old
Son: James Genge was 3 years old

BIRTH and DEATH DATES
William Genge Head 42 (1808–1881)
Mary Genge Wife 45 (1807–1891)
John Genge 21 (1829–1892)
Joseph Genge 19 (1831–1905)
Martha Genge 17 (1833-1925)
Mary Genge 15 (1835–1923)
Thomas Genge 10 (1842–1915)
David Genge 6 (1844–1915)
James Genge 3 (1847–1927)
Theophalous Genge 4 months (1850–1851)

Genge Somerset census 1855

1851 or 1855 (?) Census, Somersetshire, UK
Ref: somho107_1929_1930-0454

1857: ARRIVAL at HOBART (Tas)
William and Mary Genge arrived at Hobart, Tasmania in 1857 with four sons and one daughter on board the Prompt as bounty immigrants, sponsored by Henry CHILDS. They arrived without Martha Genge. She would arrive in 1878 and marry Thomas Nevin's father John Nevin snr in 1879.

Summary details:
William Genge, Married, 45 yrs old. Religion, Methodist. Education, R & W. Native place, Somersetshire. Trade, Quarryman. Name of person on whose application sent out, Henry Childs. Amount of Bounty £16.
Mary Genge, married, 44 years old. Glover 
Joseph Genge, single, 21 years old. Quarryman.
Mary Genge, 18 years old.
Thomas Genge, 13 yrs old. Baker's lad
David Genge, 11 years old.
James Genge, 9 years old.

Henry John CHILDS was the person on whose application the Genge family was sent out. Henry Childs was 39 years old when he arrived with his family in 1854. He was a schoolmaster at Old Beach with the birth of six more children after the birth of a female child on board the Maitland in 1854 on the voyage out. Emma was born in 1856, Angelina was born in 1857, and no name male child was born in 1858. Henry Childs was listed as bootmaker at New Town Road in 1859, a cordwainer in 1861 and a bootmaker when he died aged 84, on 30 July 1898.

Genge family arrivals Tas 1857

Source: Archives Office of Tasmania; Tasmania, Australia;
Descriptive List of Immigrants;
Film Number: SLTX/AO/MB/140;
Series Number: CB7/12/1/6-9
Source: https://stors.tas.gov.au/RGD35-1-67$init=RGD35-1-67P83

1881: DEATH of William GENGE
When William Genge died on 16 January 1881 at Melville St. Hobart, 78 years old, of apoplexy and paralysis, his close friend John Nevin snr wrote this lament:



"Lines written on the sudden and much lamented death of Mr William Genge who died at the Wesleyan Chapel, Melville-street, Hobart on the morning of 17th January 1881, in the 73rd year of his age" by John Nevin snr
Publication Information: Hobart : Pratt, printer, 1881.
Physical description: 1 sheet.
Record ID: SD_ILS:542990 State Library of Tasmania
Allport Library Pamphlets P 820.A NEV



Genge, William
Record Type: Deaths
Gender: Male
Age: 73
Date of death: 16 Jan 1881
Registered: Hobart. Registration year: 1881
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1228887
Resource: RGD35/1/9 no 2900
Archives Office of Tasmania
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/RGD35-1-9$init=RGD35-1-9P329

Addenda 2: Chandler family
1846: Arrival of William Chandler, Hobart, VDL
William Chandler, bootmaker from Dover, Kent, arrived at Hobart, Van Diemen's Land (Tasmania) on the Calcutta in October 1846 accompanied by his sister Mary Selina Chandler to join their brother, boat builder Jacob Bayley Chandler (Ref: Nicole Mays, For many years a boat builder : the life and life's work of Jacob Bayly Chandler 2011:65).



Arrival at Hobart, VDL, barque Calcutta, 486 tons, 24 October 1846
Wm Chandler and sister, steerage
Archives Office Tasmania
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/MB2-39-1-9P022



Photo of William Chandler (1825-1907)
Unattributed [?] possibly taken ca. 1875 at Thomas J. Nevin's studio which William Chandler leased from 1876 for his bootmaker's business.
Source: courtesy of Nicole Mays, email February 2023, recto only copied from microfilm at the Archives Office of Tasmania.
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/NS434-1-93

Jacob Bayley Chandler married Martha Macbeth in 1861. She died aged 38, in 1867, daughter of Peter Macbeth.
DEATHS. CHANDLER.—On 7th April, at Battery Point, Martha, the beloved wife of Jacob Bailey Chandler, in the 38th year of her age.
Death of Martha Chandler nee Macbeth
Source: Launceston Examiner (Tas. : 1842 - 1899), Tuesday 23 April 1867, page 4

1848: CENSUS (Tas)
William CHANDLER 17 Warwick St Hobart
2 persons male and female over 60 yrs old

MARRIAGES
1855: William Chandler , first marriage to Kezia Cox, 31 May 1855.
1868: William Chandler, second marriage to Mary Genge, 14 January 1868
1888: Ethel Mary Chandler (19) married William James Hooper (22), Clerk, on 18th November 1888 at the Hobart Congregational Church, witnesses were Mary Ann Hooper and William Chandler (No. 1287).

ALL CHANDLERS 1890-91
Chandler George, 70 Melville st. Hobart
Chandler George, Queen st. Sandy Bay
Chandler Henry B. McRobie's Gully, Cascades, Hobart
Chandler John, landholder, Snake Plains
Chandler John T. 4 Byron street, Hobart
Chandler John, Distillery Creek, Launcstn
Chandler John, Parliament st. Sandy Bay
Chandler John, produce dealer, Longford
Chandler John, corn dealer, Longford
Chandler John T. 8 Napoleon street, Battery Point, Hobart
Chandler Richard, 228 Brisbane st.Launcstn
Chandler Richard J. 84 Galvin st. Launcstn
Chandler Robert, general smith, 78 Wellington road, Launceston.
Chandler Robert H. musical instrument dealer 124 Liverpool street, Hobart
Chandler Robert H. Providence valley, Mt. Stuart
Chandler William, bootmaker, 39 Liverpool. st. Hobart
Chandler William, Woodbridge
Chandler William Park street, Newtown
Chandler William' craftsman, Kettering
Chandler Mrs. Wml. Bathurst st. Launceston

OTHER MEN NAMED WILLIAM CHANDLER in Tasmania
One was a mechanical engineer and inn keeper at Brisbane Hotel, Brisbane St. married to Annie Maria Taylor. Another was a farmer in Launceston. Another with his wife had a criminal record for manslaughter in 1903.

RESIDENCES and PROPERTIES
This is a selection only of some of the premises occupied by James Chandler and his father William Chandler snr in Hobart Tasmania between 1848 and 1946, together with a few listings of the Nevin and Genge families. Please note: this list is selective and incomplete of links to primary documents, most of which are available at the Archives Office of Tasmania (NAMES INDEX) and Familysearch.org.

1848: CENSUS VDL
William CHANDLER 17 Warwick St Hobart
2 persons male and female over 60 yrs old

1870: LAND & TITLES
Chandler, William bought over 2 acres for £380.
Record Type: Land
Date: 1870
Location: Glenorchy
Remarks: 2 acres, 1 rood, 11 perches
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1743112
https://stors.tas.gov.au/NI/1743112

1874: 18th November. LAND & TITLES
Chandler, William bought land along boundary of the Orphan School west from Main Road for £24.
Record Type: Land
Date: 1874
Location: New Town
Remarks: 21 1/10 perches
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1743115
https://stors.tas.gov.au/RD1-1-78$init=RD1-1-78P085JPG

1877: VALUATION ROLLS
Two allotments Main Road New Town W. Chandler occupier and owner W Chandler
House and shop, William Chandler 140 Elizabeth St. owner John Elliott, Brown St.
House and shop, 271 Eliz. St. (also called New Town Rd, Main Rd after Warwick St).
House shop land Thos Mullen and W. Genge owner Thos Mullen snr

1884: VALUATION ROLLS
House and shop, William Chandler 140 Elizabeth St. owner John Elliott, Brown St.
House, boat yard and workshops, Napoleon St. Jacob B. Chandler owner J. B. Chandler
New Wharf: house workshop dilapidated J. B. Chandler Alexander Mc Gregor
Ware St. John Chandler owner
Colville St. House John Chandler John Chandler
11 Goulburn St. Res John Chandler owner Mary A. Ray

Cottage and Garden Cascade-valley Chandler, Henry B. on property,owner
Schoolhouse and dwelling Kangaroo Valley Nevin John on property, Trustees Wesleyan Chapel New Town 1 acre
Garden ditto Nevin John, owner Mary Nairn New Town 1 acre
Dallas Arms, 269 Elizabeth St. Genge, Dallas Arms Anne Allen John Allen's estate
Land and House 271 Elizabeth St. William Genge Mrs Mullen 26

1885: VALUATION ROLLS
House, 76 Argyle St William Chandler, owner John T Smith Campbell St.
House and shop, 140 Eliz St William Chandler owner John Elliot

1886: VALUATION ROLLS
NB: by 1886 Elizabeth St numbers had changed.
Public House, 174 Eliz St. (formerly 142) occupier Frank Stewart, owner John Elliott, Brown St.
House and shop, 172 Eliz St. (formerly 140) William Chandler, owner John W Elliott ditto

1890: VALUATION ROLLS:
House, 132 Harrington St. Thomas Nevin jnr (Sonny Nevin) , owner Mrs Beedham
House and Shop 39 Liverpool St. William Chandler J P Rowe owner Victoria.
James Chandler was living here with his father Wm Chandler snr

1896-97: Tasmanian PO Directory Wises Directory 1896-97
https://stors.tas.gov.au/ILS/SD_ILS-203228
NEVIN, Thomas snr 82 Warwick St. between Elizabeth and Murray Sts
CHANDLER, William Bootmaker 39 Liverpool Street, 3 doors from Argyle St intersection

1906:
CHANDLER, James and father William Chandler, 241 Argyle St, on right side from Wharf.
Wm Chandler snr died in 1907
NEVIN, Thomas jnr - bootmaker 236 Eliz. St. aka Sonny - son of Thomas James Nevin snr

1916:
CHANDLER, Mrs Mary, 101 Warwick St. Hobart



The Tasmania post office directory.
Publication Information:
Hobart, Tas. : H. Wise & Co.. 1891-1937.
https://stors.tas.gov.au/ILS/SD_ILS-203228



Mrs Mary Chandler, mother of James Chandler, ca. 1915 (unidentified, but from the Chandler Collection)
Source: Archives Office Tasmania, https://stors.tas.gov.au/NS869-1-482

1938:
CHANDLER, James. Photographer 28 Liverpool St between Park St. and Campbell St.

1945-6:
CHANDLER, James, discrepancies in date of death, possibly because he died intestate. One source of death is 8th July 1945, another is date of will, 27 March 1946. James CHANDLER (1877-1946) late of McRobies Road, died at St Helens Hospital on 27 March 1946. Value of estate Pounds £332.2.
Source: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AD963-1-3-2867$init=AD963-1-3-2867_1



Visitors to the ruins of the Port Arthur Penitentiary 1930
Photographer: James Chandler
Source: https://stors.tas.gov.au/NS1231-1-88J2K$init=NS1231-1-88

RELATED POSTS main weblog

NEVIN & SMITH, 1868: the client with white fingernails

Photographers NEVIN & SMITH, Hobart 1868
INJURY and DISEASE 19th Tasmanian industries
CAMERAS, lenses, and the circle of confusion

Robert Smith was known to Mrs Esther Mather. She was not happy about the colouring he had applied to a portrait of her brother when he visited the studio she called "Smith's" in Hobart. She said so in a letter to her step-son, dated 1865. Nothing was known about this partner of Thomas J. Nevin called Robert Smith until recently when portraits and stereoscopes bearing the business name NEVIN & SMITH came to light. Robert Smith may have been an independent photographer prior to forming a partnership with Thomas J. Nevin at Alfred Bock's former studio. The partnership lasted less than a year and was promptly dissolved in February 1868 following the Royal visit to Hobart, Tasmania of Alfred Ernest Albert, Duke of Edinburgh, second son of Queen Victoria, in late 1867 on his first command, H.M.S. Galatea. Thomas J. Nevin continued the photographic business in his own name at Alfred Bock's former studio, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town, while Robert Smith departed for Goulburn NSW where he set up a photographic studio before taking to farming and politics.

Points of Interest
Two studio stamps and the two labels have survived from studio portraits and stereoscopes taken during the partnership of Robert Smith and Thomas Nevin, but for rarity alone, the stamp they printed in anticipation of the Royal visit is their unique legacy. It featured the Prince of Wales' blazon of three feathers and a coronet, banded with the German "ICH DIEN" (I Serve).

To date, four cartes-de-visite have surfaced bearing this stamp:
1. a delicately tinted upper-body portrait in a buff oval mount of an unidentified bearded young man seated in semi-profile, wearing a summer check-patterned jacket (view here);
2. a full-length portrait taken by Thomas J. Nevin of his sixteen year-old brother, Jack Nevin standing next to a plaster plinth on thick carpet (view here);
3. a full-length hand-coloured portrait of two children standing on either side of a dining chair; and
4. a full length hand-coloured portrait of a young man standing next to a dining chair (the two below).

This last portrait, the most recent to emerge in the market place, is yet another rare example of the work of the firm NEVIN & SMITH bearing the feathered Royal insignia. As nothing is known about this young man, he will remain nameless in the discussion which follows...

cdv by Nevin & Smith 1868 Hobart Tascdv verso by Nevin & Smith 1868 Hobart Tas

Carte-de-visite, hand-coloured full-length portrait of a young man, mid-twenties
Photographer(s): NEVIN & SMITH - Thomas J. Nevin and Robert Smith.
Location and date: Hobart, Tasmania, January 1868
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint & Private Collection 2021. Watermarked.

cdv by Nevin & Smith 1868 Hobart Tas

Subject: Solidly built young man in mid-twenties, wearing a thin jacket with creased sleeves, waistcoat, cravat and white pocketchief, and corduroy trousers.
Photographer(s): NEVIN & SMITH - Thomas J. Nevin and Robert Smith.
Location and date: Hobart, Tasmania, January 1868
Format: carte-de-visite, full -length portrait, sepia print on plain buff mount
Details: mulberry colouring on drape, light violet tinting on man's cravat, tinting on man's cheeks
Condition: good, some dark spots, discolouring of carpet where foreground blurring of focus has occurred
Provenance: Douglas Stewart Fine Books, Melbourne, Vic.
Verso: Prince of Wales blazon with three feathers, coronet and band with "ICH DIEN"
Printed below: "From NEVIN & SMITH Late Bock's, 140 Elizabeth Street HOBART TOWN. N.B. Additional copies may be had at any date if required."
Copyright: © KLW NFC Imprint & Private Collection 2021. Watermarked.

LENSES and DEPTH of FIELD.
The 19th century cameras Thomas J. Nevin was using at his studio in the 1860s included a single lens sliding box camera and stereoscopic cameras, some on loan from his close friend, prolific stereographer Samuel Clifford, plus a variety of other equipment salvaged at auction from the studios of photographers George Cherry and Alfred Bock in 1864-65 when both men separately faced insolvency.

The blurred foreground at the bottom of this photograph of the young man suggests the photographer had miscalculated the depth of field for a full-length portrait of a fully-grown male standing too close to the camera; or indeed, he had chosen a lens more suited to closer upper-body portraiture. A successful photograph would get as much of the shot in focus as possible without blurring the foreground, known as the blur spot or circle of confusion. The hyperfocal distance between the carpet on the floor in front of the camera, the standing figure of the young man in the middle distance, and the back wall would be measured as much through subjective judgment as through formulae such as this one:

hyperfocus distance formula

Measuring acceptable sharpness:
Key: f is focal length, N is aperture, and c is maximum circle of confusion (blur spot)

Source: https://petapixel.com/2021/06/01/what-is-hyperfocal-distance-and-how-do-you-find-it/

The strongest and sharpest point of focus in this photograph of the young man (above) is at the image's centre where his right hand rests on the carved crest rail of the dining chair. And at the very centre of that centre, the whiteness of his fingernails stands out. They are as white as the handkerchief sitting in his breast pocket.

FINGERNAILS and DISEASE
Those fingernails were not tinted after printing. A smudge of red colour shows at lower right on the buff mount where the colour was applied to the drape after pasting down the print. A studio assistant may have painted the young man's fingernails white prior to the sitting for cosmetic reasons, if they were permanently blackened working in industries such as gardening, coal mining, tanning leather and textile dyeing etc. Untouched, unpainted, his white fingernails might also suggest injury or disease of some kind. Particular diseases associated with total leukonychia, which is the whitening of the entire nail plate, are caused by the following:

1. an injury which has disrupted the horizontal layers of keratin, trapping air and resulting in reflection and lack of transparency. Nail-biting, knocks and bangs, and detachment of the nail plate are all injuries. Onycholysis results when the nail plate has been lifted from the nail bed.
2. heavy metal poisoning such as lead and arsenic
3. inherited or longitudinal leukonychia which can run in families
4. systemic illnesses such as liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, protein malabsorption, eg in colitis, protein-losing enteropathy, diabetes, iron deficiency anaemia, zinc deficiency, and hyperthyroidism
5. fungal infection due to the dermatophyte, trichophyton interdigitale.

Source: https://dermnetnz.org/topics/white-nail

A FAMILY MAN
This young man's whitened nails might be the result of injury or regular exposure to chemicals from daily physical work involving lifting, if the creasing of his jacket sleeves especially at the elbows is any indication, rather than being symptomatic of systemic disease. His strong gaze and solid build suggest he was in good health. His creased sleeves on the other hand might be the result of lifting the two children (cdv below). The similarities between the two photographs suggest the young man and the two children were photographed in exactly the same studio set-up and probably in the same session. He would most likely be their father or guardian, in that case, and have creased sleeves on the day from constantly lifting and carrying his toddler daughter and four-year old son. And it was a special day.

cdv by Nevin & Smith 1868 Hobart Tas

Both photographs share these compositional and textual features:

1. the same thick carpet with large squares, floral pattern at centre and white edges
2. the same dining chair with carved crest rail and cabriole legs
3. the same drape to right of frame similarly coloured dark red.
4. the same stamp verso with the NEVIN & SMITH mark prepared especially for the Royal visit
5. the two photographs were taken by the same photographer in the same session
6. the same camera lens or depth of field calculation resulted in the same blurring of focus on the carpet in the foreground

Those similarities suggest the following contextual relations:

1. these children were photographed minutes apart in the same session as the young man suggesting his presence as their father or guardian
2. the day was a special occasion - these children and the young man made the trip to Hobart Town's centre to see Prince Alfred and the Galatea  during the Royal visit.
3. the special occasion warranted a photograph taken at the NEVIN & SMITH studio during their visit as a keepsake and memories of a great day's entertainment in town.
4. the mother of these two children and wife of this young man (if still with the family) may have been photographed at NEVIN & SMITH's as well in the same session, raising the possibility that her photograph, if extant, is yet to be identified.



State Library of Victoria
Studio portrait of two children
Author / Creator Nevin & Smith, photographer.
Date [ca. 1867-ca. 1875]
Accession no: H2005.34/2004
Accession no: H2005.34/2004A
Gift of Mr John Etkins; 2005.
http://handle.slv.vic.gov.au/10381/49353
http://search.slv.vic.gov.au/permalink/f/1cl35st/SLV_ROSETTAIE8428491
http://search.slv.vic.gov.au/permalink/f/1cl35st/SLV_VOYAGER1805149

Aftermath of the Royal visit
Two events in February 1868 coincided to change Thomas J. Nevin's photographic practice. The dissolution of his partnership with Robert Smith meant that he would no longer use the two studio stamps and labels advertising the business they conducted from Alfred Bock's former studio, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town, under the name "NEVIN & SMITH" from 1867 to February 1868.

One of those studio stamps was a simple cartouche which has survived by descent in family collections on both versos of a vignetted portrait and a full-length portrait of Elizabeth Rachel Day, Thomas Nevin's fiancée (they married in July 1871). The other stamp which featured the Prince of Wales' blazon of three feathers and a coronet, banded with the German "ICH DIEN" (I Serve) to mark the Royal visit in 1868 became obsolete once the celebrations were over. So, from March 1868 until early 1876, Thomas Nevin used one of Alfred Bock's more recent designs with minimal changes as his most common commercial stamp which was applied to the versos of all portraits of private clients. For portraits of public servants and their families, for mugshots of prisoners, for landscapes and townscapes he produced under government contract for the Hobart City Council, a colonial government Royal Warrant stamp with the Royal Arms insignia was designed for him using his initials, T. J. Nevin, by government printer James Barnard.

When these the two unidentified women (below) visited Thomas J. Nevin at his studio, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart in the months following the Royal Visit, he positioned them on the same carpet and posed them with right hand placed on the same chair as he had posed the young man in the NEVIN & SMITH portrait (at top) but with the addition of books opened on an occasional table in front of the drape. In both of these cdv's of a younger and an older woman, the drape at right of frame was spared the heavy dark-red colouring. While the cdv of the older woman was enhanced with delicate tinting in pink, the cdv of the younger woman escaped any sort of enhancement. No strong blurring of the foreground is evident in any of these cdv's taken by Thomas Nevin after ca. 1870, suggesting he had acquired better cameras, lenses, and improved technique in how to use them.



National Gallery of Victoria Catalogue Notes
No title (woman wearing a bonnet with a pink bow), carte-de-visite (1865-1867)
T. NEVIN, Hobart
Medium albumen silver photograph, watercolour
Measurements 9.5 × 5.8 cm (image and support)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Inscription printed in ink on support on reverse c. AD ALTIORA / CITY PHOTOGRAPHIC ESTABLISHMENT / T. NEVIN. / LATE / A. BOCK. / 140 ELIZABETH ST / HOBART TOWN. / Further copies / can be obtained at / any time.
Accession Number 2003.395 Department Australian Photography Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Presented through the NGV Foundation by John McPhee, Member, 2003



Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery Collection
TMAG Ref: Q2012.28.28
Full length cdv on plain mount
Subject: Elizabeth Bayley, second wife of Captain James Bayley of Runnymede, New Town, Tasmania
Photographer: studio portrait by Thomas Nevin late December 1874.
Verso with studio stamp: “Ad Altiora” above Kangaroo emblem, T. Nevin late A. Bock encircled by belt printed with “City Photographic Establishment” and address below, “140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town”. In italics below: “Further Copies can be obtained at any time”.

Thomas Nevin's use of a newer lenses, which allowed shorter focal range and a larger image of the face and hands without sacrificing clarity, became his trademark when he commenced the photographing of prisoners with Supreme Court convictions on contract for the Colonial Government in early 1872. His portrait of Sarah Crouch, wife of Under-Sheriff Thomas Crouch, taken about the same time foreshadowed the format he would use for producing mugshots. The newer lenses meant he could position her closer to the camera without blurring either foreground (her hands) or background.

By the time Alfred Barrett Biggs visited Thomas J. Nevin's studio for a portrait ca. 1873, a few changes in decor had taken place. The thick carpet was gone, replaced by a thin tapis patterned with lozenges and chains that was bunched untidily against the back wall rather than smoothly laid. Behind Biggs, low on the back wall the rectangular outline of an object which had recently been removed had not been cleaned off. The same dining chair remained, now positioned to the left of Biggs in front of a new floral-patterned damask drape drawn back to reveal a floor-to-ceiling backsheet painted with a tiled Italianate terrace overlooking a cart path next to a stream disappearing to low mountains at the horizon. The delicate tinting with gold applied to Bigg's fob watch by Nevin's studio colourist in this portrait, however, differed markedly from the heavy-handed daubs of dark red applied to several other of his portraits including the NEVIN & SMITH portraits of the young man and the two children (at top). This heavy daubing in dark red appears on a dozen of Nevin's cdvs and is thought to have been applied after purchase, or even later, by collectors in the belief that strong colour would enhance their viewing, more so if they were to use a stereoscope for a 3D effect.



Alfred Barrett Biggs ca, 1872-4 (ca. 45 yrs old)
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin, City Photographic Establishment, Hobart (verso stamp)
Source: Archives Office of Tasmania
View online: https://stors.tas.gov.au/LMSS754-1-9

ADDENDA
The Tasmanian Times Special Edition ran a lengthy report on each stage of the Duke's tour around Hobart. Thomas Nevin's colleague Samuel Clifford produced a fine series of stereoscopic and album prints of the day, which he advertised for sale on the 26th February 1868.



TRANSCRIPT
PHOTOGRAPHS CONNECTED WITH H.R.H. THE.DUKE OF EDINBURGH'S VISIT TO TASMANIA.
Landing in State, "instantaneous," stereoscopic and album.
The Landing, 10 x 8.
The Galatea, 10 x 8, stereoscopic and album.
Emblematic Arch, 10 x 8, stereoscopic and album.
State Carriage, with Outriders und Orderlies, cabinet!
The Duke's Saddle Horse, album.
H. R. H. His Excellency, and Company at Government House', 10 x 8.
S. CLIFFORD, Liverpool-street, Prize Medalist [sic] at Melbourne, and highest Award at New Zealand.
Advertising (1868, February 26). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 1.
Link: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article8850754

Citizens Arch 1868 Duke's visit, S. Clifford photo

Emblematic Arch, 10 x 8, stereoscopic and album.
Photographer Samuel Clifford 1868
Archives Office of Tasmania Ref: PH30-1-31



TRANSCRIPT
THE EMBLEMATIC ARCH.
In this order the procession moved away under the Emblematic Arch, erected by the Citizens' Reception Committee. This was declared on all sides to be a novel and striking feature in the various symbols of welcome offered to the Prince, and very successfully carried out. The piers were built up of tun butts, used in our whaling trade. The arch itself being composed of a main and two smaller arches, surmounted by bales of wool, pockets of hops, cases of preserves, bundles of shingles, leather, and bark used in tanning, sheaves of wheat, and a variety of the other products of the colony. Above the whole the jaw bones of a sperm whale. The side openings were crowned by two whale boats manned by the proper number of hands dressed in whaling costume. The whole of the arch was embellished with our beautiful ferns and flowers. On the side to meet the Prince's view was the legend " Welcome to Tasmania," and on the other side was "Welcome Sailor Prince." The top of it was decorated with flags. The whole line of the procession from the landing stage was also decorated with flags. Every halting place or stoppage was taken advantage of to loudly cheer our Royal visitor, who courteously responded to the same by bowing. Along the wharf and up Murray-street were several commodious stands tastefully decorated, and filled with well dressed people who all cheered lustily as the Prince passed. The procession moved slowly upwards from the wharf amidst continuous cheering, between two lines of Military who kept the route clear from the landing stage to the arch in Murray street.
THE STATE LANDING. (1868, February 1). The Tasmanian Times (Hobart Town, Tas. : 1867 - 1870), p. 3.
Link: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article232857843

RELATED POSTS main blog

Captains, emigrants and convicts: the summer of 1842-1843 in Hobart, VDL

Captain Edward GOLDSMITH on the Janet Izzat
Lt. Charles HEXT on the Cape Packet
PRISONERS on the Emily and Moffatt
George O'BRIEN, spy, on the Sir Charles Napier
Bounty emigrants the JUDD family on the Sir Charles Napier
Thomas NEVIN, Joseph THOMAS and John NEVIN snr at Cygnet, Tasmania



Artist: William Clark (Scottish, 1803–1883)
Title: The barque "Sir Charles Napier", Pladda Island in the distance , 1841–1841

The summer of 1842-1843
The tiny southern port of Hobart, Van Diemen's Land (Tasmania) accommodated dozens of shipping vessels of all sizes arriving and departing during the summer of 1842-1843. Those who disembarked at the wharves to catch their first breath and sight of this Antipodean penal colony were from every social class. As future free labour, there were the hundreds of transported prisoners and their guards, the soldiers of the 90th Regiment. Then there were the bounty emigrants, and their wealthier counterparts, the free settlers with their servants. Accompanying their cargo were the traders who maintained the supply chain of imports, the livestock, the machinery, the alcohol, and the luxury goods bought on charter for local merchants and farmers.

Passengers departing that summer included well-heeled officials returning to Britain after service, and less fortunate, those families whose energies and resources were effectively depleted. Producers of high value exports such as whale oil and wool entrusted the safe passage of their cargo to merchant mariners such as Captain Edward Goldsmith (1804-1869) who was back in port in command of the barque Janet Izat [var. Izzat] by late October 1842 and would remain until departure in February 1843. Over two decades in almost every summer from the 1830s to 1852 he had arrived at Sydney NSW and/or Hobart VDL in command of the Wave, the Parrock Hall, the Angelina, the Janet Izzat, and the superior barque commissioned for him by its owner Robert Brooks, the Rattler. Captain Goldsmith would become photographer Thomas J. Nevin's uncle-in-law in 1871 on his marriage to Elizabeth Rachel Day, Captain Goldsmith's niece, daughter of his wife's brother, Captain James Day, who was also his navigator and first mate in the 1830s.

Contracted to the colonial government to provide police identification photographs from 1872, Thomas J. Nevin would later encounter some of these prisoners who disembarked from the Moffatt and the Emily in late November, 1842. They were the recidivists who offended and were sentenced in the Supreme Court and photographed over the course of their criminal careers. One prisoner in particular, Elijah ELTON alias John JONES was photographed by Thomas J. Nevin on arrest at the Hobart Gaol on 20 November 1874. He was transported as Elisha NELMES on the Emily, arriving at Hobart on 29 November 1842. By May 1875 the police had confidently identified "John Jones" as Elijah Elton. Prison and police administrators used the name Elijah Elton on official records, and recorded as well his other aliases, viz. John Jones, Thomas Turner, and the moniker 'Flash Jack'. He was buried in 1883 under the name he was transported: Elisha NELMES.



Flash Jack: prisoner Elijah ELTON or Elisha NELMES, alias John JONES
Photographer: T. J. NEVIN 1874
NLA Catalogue: nla.obj-142917611

Among the 220 bounty emigrants who disembarked at Hobart from the Sir Charles Napier on 29 November 1842 were members of the JUDD family from Barkway, Hertfordshire (UK). Parents Thomas Judd snr and Elizabeth Judd nee Cane [var. Cain] arrived with eight of their children: Elizabeth, Thomas, John, Ann, Rebecca, Susan, Martha and Henry. A remarkable account of the voyage and the tragedy which followed was documented by twenty-year-old Thomas Judd in his diary, from departure in August 1842 to arrival and aftermath, in January 1843. Twenty five years later, Hobart photographer Thomas J. Nevin would hear about this family from one of his sitters, Joseph THOMAS, farmer of Cygnet who married a daughter of the JUDD family, Rebecca Judd, in 1852 only to lose her in childbirth in 1864 (see transcript and cdv below).

SHIPS in PORT at HOBART Nov. 29, 1842 (incomplete list)
The barque Janet Izat, Goldsmith, master
The barque Calcutta, Hawkes, master
The barque Cape Packet, Lamb, master
The schooner, Industry, Haughton, master
The barque Emily, Humble, master
The ship Sydney, Potter, master
The barque Sir Charles Napier, Wright, master
The barque Moffatt, Gilbert, master
The brig Caroline, Coombs, master



Colonial Times (Hobart, Tas. : 1828 - 1857), Tuesday 29 November 1842, page 2 http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article8753132

TRANSCRIPT
SHIP NEWS.
Nov.23.- Arrived the barque Calcutta, Hawkes master, from London 3rd August, with a general cargo. Cabin passengers - Mr. and Mrs. Reid, Mr. Reid, jun., Mrs. Williams, Mr. and Mrs. Russell, Mr. Russell, jun.. Miss Lewis, Miss Patterson, Mr. Barr, Mrs. Smith and two children. Mrs. Butcher and family. Mr. Brown. Mr. Simson, Mrs. Crouch and two sons, and Mr. S. T. Haslett, M.D. Steerage ditto -- Mr. Whitney, Mrs. Savage and child, Andrew Christie, George Cutts, Edward Whitehouse, Samuel Barker, Thos. Savage, and three bounty immigrants - namely, Catherine Cummings, Ellen Dow, and John Cameron.
Nov. 24.-Arrived the barque Cape Packet, Lamb master, from the Cape of Good Hope 15th October, with 78 male prisoners (one died on the passage) ; Surgeon Superintendent, Dr. Kelsall. The guard consists of Lieut. Hext, of the 4th, or King's Own; Ensign Leigh; and 30 rank and file of the 99th regiment.
Nov. 24.-Arrived the schooner Industry, Haughton master, from Port Albert 14th instant, with 12 head of cattle.
Nov. 24 - Arrived the barque Emily, Humble master, from Sheerness the 28th June, with 238 male prisoners; Surgeon Superintendent, Dr. Henderson. Passengers — Major, Mrs., and Miss Victor. The guard consists of Lieutenant Ramsbottom, of the 99th ; Ensign Brace, of the 96th ; 30 rank and file of the 99th regiment; with 4 women, 4 children, and 2 servants - namely, Jane Patterson and Charles Moore.
Nov. 26 - Sailed the ship Sydney, 348 tons, Potter master, for Port Phillip, in ballast.
Nov. 28 - Arrived the Sir Charles Napier, 600 tons, Wright master, from Plymouth the 21st August, with 220 Emigrants-, Dr. Walker, Surgeon Superintendent.
Nov. 28.—Arrived the barque Moffatt, 821 tons, Gilbert master, from Plymouth the 14th August, with male prisoners ; Surgeon Superintendent, Dr. Smith, R. N. Passengers — Lieut. F. Finney, (80th Regiment,) Lady and 4 children ; 38 rank and file 99th Regiment, 4 women, and 5 children.
Nov. 28 —Sailed the brig Caroline, 113 tons, Coombs master, for Sydney, with sundries. Passenger-George Thorne, Esq., (owner) Lady and attendants.
NB: The Port Officers' Reports of Ships' Arrivals with Lists of Passengers (MB2/39) between 8 July 1841 and 7 Dec 1842 are online at the Archives Office of Tasmania
View online: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AI/MB2-39-1-6

Captain Goldsmith, master of the "Janet Izat" 1842-43
Captain Edward Goldsmith arrived back in Hobart from London as master of the Janet Izat on 26 October 1842 (Ref: TAHO MB2/39/1/6 P355). He was invited to join a small company of seven to dine with the Franklins at Government House, including Dr. Joseph Milligan, superintendent of the Aboriginal group at Oyster Cove, and the auditor George Boyes, appointed acting Colonial Secretary (2 February 1842–20 April 1843) on John Franklin's recommendation after dismissing the previous Colonial Secretary, John Montagu, who had alleged interference in government by Jane Franklin. The discussions at dinner might well have centred on the Franklins' difficulties with Montagu and other senior officials but of immediate concern to Captain Goldsmith was Sir John Franklin's arrangements with him for the safe return passage of gravely ill Antarctic circumnavigator Captain John Biscoe and family on board the Janet Izat. Captain Biscoe died at sea on the Janet Izat on the return voyage to London departing 15th February 1843. On the topic of polar exploration Sir John Franklin may have foreshadowed in this company at dinner his desire to reprise a commission from the Admiralty to lead a naval expedition to the Arctic, an ambition which cost him his life in June 1847. The Franklins departed Hobart, VDL for Port Phillip, Victoria on board the Flying Fish, later the same year, in November 1843.

The Hobart Regatta
The more immediate concern for John Franklin was the appointment of Captain Goldsmith as umpire of the four oars gigs race at the upcoming Hobart Regatta to be held at Sandy Bay on 1st December, 1842. The event was marked by a protest from Mr. Hefford:
The second was that of gigs pulling four oars ; the first boat to receive fifteen sovereigns, and the second seven sovereigns. Five boats started: the " Cater- pillar," "Centipede," "Chase-all," "Gaxelle," and the "Son of the Thames." At first each seemed to maintain its place, continuing to do so as far as the outward ' buoy, when the " Gaxelle" began to creep away, and continued gradually to gain apace until she arrived at the goal, closely followed by the "Centipede." The pull was, altogether, a heavy one, and, we should say, bespoke rather the energy of muscle than a decision as to the speed of the rival crafts. The winners were- of the first prise, Mr. Bayley, owner of the" Gaxelle," and of the second, Mr. C. Lovett, by the " Centipede ;" these received their prizes, accompanied by the usual honours, at the hands of M. T. Chapman, though not without a protest on the part of Mr. J. Hefford against the bestowal of the second prize, on the ground that the " Centipede" had not properly rounded one of the buoys. The objection was done away with, as well by Mr. Kelly as by Captain Goldsmith, who had been appointed umpire, under the Impression that Mr. Hefford had publicly withdrawn his boat.
Source: LOCAL. (1842, December 2). The Courier (Hobart, Tas. : 1840 - 1859), p. 2. https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article2953480

Lieut. Charles Hext on board the "Cape Packet" 1842
Charles Hext (1815-1855) of the 4th King's Own Regiment arrived at Hobart from Cape Town on 24th November 1842 on board the Cape Packet after narrowly escaping the wreck of the convict ship Waterloo. He sketched the wreck, which was produced as a lithograph by Charles Hutchins with some details of the event below the image. Of the 300 on board, 189 perished. Lt. Hext and 17 members and families of the 90th Regiment survived. Of the convicts who survived, 76 were taken to the prison at Cape Town. The South African Commercial Advertiser for 31 August 1842 and for 3, 7 and 10 September 1842 carried reports of the wreck in a scathing critique of those responsible. For names of the prisoners, soldiers and passengers who perished and those who survived, see this list online (courtesy of Sue Mackay).



Title: Wreck of the Waterloo convict ship, Cape of Good Hope, 28th. August 1842 C. Hutchins, lithographer ; from a sketch by Captn. Hext, 4th The King's Own regiment.
Author/Creator: Hutchins, Charles.
Publication Information: Liverpool (England) : C. Hutchins, [18--]
Physical description: 1 print : lithograph ; sheet 31 x 41 cm.
Format: print image (online)
Notes: Printed lower right below image: C. Hutchins, Lithographer, Liverpool.
Title centred below image.
Printed below title: This vessel was blown on shore at 10 o'clock am and in about two hours 189 souls perished out of 300 The officers all saved Lieutt. Hext who commanded the guard was on shore at the time.
"From a sketch ..." printed centre lower margin.
Image size 222 x 290 mm.
Exhibited: Far Flung Places, March 2003 - August 2003.
Citation: Digitised item from: Allport Library and Museum of Fine Arts, Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office


Captain Charles Staniforth Hext (5 February 1815 – 26 January 1855) was a British military officer and artist.[1] Hext was born to Captain John Hext and Elizabeth Staniforth, on 5 February 1815. His mother was the daughter of Thomas Staniforth, former Lord Mayor of Liverpool, and his father a military captain. He joined the 4th King's Own Regiment in 1835 and was stationed in New South Wales. He arrived at Hobart, Tasmania on 12 November 1836, before being sent to India in 1837. He returned to Hobart on 24 November 1842, after narrowly escaping the wreck of the Waterloo convict ship in Cape Town. He returned to India in 1843 where he remained with his regiment until his death in Attock, Punjab on 26 January 1855 of apoplexy.[2][3]

Charles Hext was also known for his Lithography, which he created during his time in Australia. Some of these were published in 1845 by Charles Hutchins in Liverpool.[4] Hext's work is held in the permanent collection of the National Gallery of Australia;[5] the National Library of Australia;[6] the National Museum of Australia;[7] and the State Library of New South Wales.[8]
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Staniforth_Hext

Before his departure in early 1843, Charles Hext gained permission to visit Port Arthur (south of Hobart) in December 1842, producing sketches of the penitentiary and Eaglehawk Neck which were published as lithographs in Views in Australia and Tasmania by Charles Hutchins at Liverpool (UK) in 1845. He returned to India where he remained with his regiment until his death from apoplexy (stroke) on 26 January 1855. This sketch (below) by Charles Hext titled "Hobart Town and the Derwent River, Van Dieman's Land" might even depict those ships arriving and departing in the port in the River Derwent listed (above) by the Colonial Times, 29 November 1842.



Charles Staniforth Hext (1816 - 1855) artist and Charles Hutchins lithographer.
"Hobart Town and the Derwent River, Van Dieman's Land" 1845
Place of Creation: Liverpool
Object Type: prints
Medium: lithograph, printed in colour inks, from multiple stones
Dimensions: printed image 15.3 h x 25 w cm sheet 24.4 h x 30.8 w cm
Primary Inscription: no inscriptions.
State: published state Credit Line: Purchased 2017
Provenance: created based on sketch by C. S. Hext (1815-1855), by the lithographer Charles Hutchins, Liverpool, Merseyside, England, 1845 [ownership and location unknown for the period 1845-1975] collection of Clifford Craig (1896-1986), Australia, by 1975 who sold it through Christie's, 'The important collection of books, manuscripts, prints, drawings and paintings relating to the discovery and history of Van Diemen's Land and Tasmania, and with a few items relating to Australasia : the property of Dr. Clifford Craig', Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, October 1975 where it was purchased by Ted Gregg, Australia, 1975 acquired by John McPhee, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, between 1978 and 2007 who sold it to the National Gallery of Australia, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia, 2017
Source: National Gallery of Australia
https://searchthecollection.nga.gov.au/object?uniqueId=311011

The "Sir Charles Napier" to Hobart 1842
Master: John WRIGHT
Origin: Plymouth departed Sunday, August 21, 1842
Destination: Hobart Town arrived Monday, November 28, 1842



Artist: William Clark (Scottish, 1803–1883)
Title: The barque "Sir Charles Napier", Pladda Island in the distance , 1841–1841
Medium: Oil on Canvas
Size: 60.7 x 90.7 cm. (23.9 x 35.7 in.)
Source: https://www.artnet.com/artists/william-clark/the-barque-sir-charles-napier-pladda-island-in-vnymDno7zn4HGKcHA8JHrQ2



Reports of ships arrivals with lists of passengers
Item Number: MB2/39/1/6
Start Date: 08 Jul 1841
End Date: 07 Dec 1842
Source: Archives Office of Tasmania
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/MB2-39-1-6$init=MB2-39-1-6P209

The Port Officer's log for the arrival at Hobart of the barque Sir Charles Napier on 28th November 1842 listed the following details:
For Van Diemen's Land:
Cabin Passengers: Dr Walker
Steerage passengers: 220 emigrants
For New South Wales: Passengers: blank blank
From whence: Plymouth
Date sailed: 21st August
State of Health: Good
Master: Wright
Owners: Wright & Co.
Tons: 600
Guns: 1
Port of Registry: London
Build: plantation
Crew: 31
Convicts: blank blank
Cargo: ~ blank
Time when boarded: 9.30 p/h 27
Bearings and distance to the Light-house: N N W 2 miles
Wind: S
Weather: fine
Pilot's name: Lucas
Agent: blank
Remarks: blank

TRAVELLERS' ACCOUNTS
There are at least four extant travellers' accounts of their voyage on the Sir William Napier:
  • Diary of Thomas Judd 4 Aug. 1842 - 2 Jan. 1843 (University Tasmania)
  • Diary of Francis Treloar, Steward, MLSA Adelaide, D 4800(L)
  • Information given to the Board by George O'Brien, NSW State Archives
  • The Maritime Heritage Project ~ San Francisco 1846-1899
George O'Brien was one of the bounty emigrants on board the "Sir Charles Napier" when it arrived at Hobart, VDL, on 28 November 1842 with the Judd family. He acted as a spy, reporting cases of abuse of the Bounty system to the Board:
Many cases of abuse of the Bounty system are evident in these Reports and it seems that many busybody passengers acted as spies! For example George O’Brien was a married bounty immigrant on the Sir Charles Napier. When he was examined by the Board he gave information on over 20 other passengers who had either sailed on false pretences or who had committed immoral acts while on board. It is interesting to note that the government refused to pay 102 of the 239 bounties for that ship.
This is an extract from Evidence of George O’Brien



Extract from Evidence of George O’Brien re voyage of ‘Sir Charles Napier’, 1842
[4/4700 pp.70-71], Reel 2852
NRS 5257, Immigration Board: Reports by Immigration Board on complaints of immigrants about their passage, 1838-87
https://gallery.records.nsw.gov.au/index.php/galleries/50-years-at-state-records-nsw/2-11

This is an extract from Evidence of George O’Brien - see Addenda 2 below for a longer list of his salacious observations:
70
George O’Brien a married man Bounty
Immigrant by “Sir Charles Napier” called in and examined – I am a married man I have a wife and six children I knew a man on board called Flynn, he told me he was a single man, there was a woman on board who had some children with her she passed as Flynn’s wife, but was not so, as I heard from Flynn I heard some conversations on board between Kings Bounty People and the Sailors, which induced me to keep a case of pistols about me I heard four of them, two men named Scully and a man named Guynan and another whose name I do
71
I do not recall say, that they were tried for the murder of Mr Biddulph, and owing to some contradictory evidence, they were liberated on bail I knew a woman on board named Anne Chambers, she shipped as a single woman but she told me she was married and had a child on board, passing as a child of Pat Cummins and that she was coming out to her husband who was a prisoner of the Crown I knew Mrs Flynn alias Hartford to be coming out to her husband who I heard was a prisoner here. I know a single girl named Jane Bryan, she was delivered of a male child on board I heard her say that she was a married woman and that her husband was a prisoner here I knew Matthew Bryan, who passed as Jane Bryan’s brother I heard Matthew Bryan acknowledge that he was the father of the child of which Jane was delivered on board Mary Flood I do not think was a good girl, she could never be kept away from the Sailors, Isabella Thompson & Rachel Thompson were also incorrect I think Mary Shaw an incorrect Girl She came on board in the Workhouse dress I think Jane Perry an incorrect Girl I knew Catherine Murphy, she was a most barefaced Girl I have seen her lying in a bed the Hospital with Watson 3d mate I have also seen her in the Green House on deck in very improper situations with Watson I knew Hannah Plunkett I have seen a very undue intimacy between Pemberton and her, I have seen them on deck with a Cloak folded about them
I knew Mary Carroll a single girl, I...

Thomas Judd's diary, 4th August 1842 to 2nd January 1843
Bounty emigrant 20 year-old shopman Thomas Judd described in vivid detail in his diary the following events he witnessed on board the Sir Charles Napier: the shenanigans performed by the crew as they crossed the Line (the Equator); the births and the numerous deaths of infants; the illnesses of passengers including himself and the medical treatments; the physical assaults and arguments between the Captain and Mates 1 and 2; the shooting of birds and the harpooning of dolphins; what the Captain's wife ate for breakfast; the heat, the calm, and the dangers of coming too close to the African coast; the rolling, rollicking, sea washing across the decks in the Southern Ocean etc etc. But most distressing of all for him was witnessing the progressive illness of his sister Elizabeth who died within days of arrival at Hobart.

The University of Tasmania holds an extract from the diary of Thomas Judd, brother of Elizabeth, John, Ann, Rebecca, Susan, Martha and Henry. The family departed Gravesend (UK) on 6th August 1842 and arrived at Hobart (Van Diemen's Land - Tasmania) on 28th November 1842:
Thomas Judd's diary 4 Aug. 1842 - 2 Jan. 1843
Diary of Thomas Judd (1822-1915) son of Thomas Judd (1794-1887) and Elizabeth (Cane) on a voyage from England to Tasmania on the "Sir Charles Napier" with his family:
"Father and Mother, Elizabeth, myself, John, Ann, Rebecca, Susan, Martha and Henry (we have left William behind - being deaf and dumb - to receive his education in the asylum)".
The diary consists mainly of the voyage: weather, activities on board, prayer meetings in their cabin. On arrival they took a house in Macquarie Street and looked for jobs. Ann and Elizabeth were offered posts as governesses but Elizabeth died on 30 December, at the age of 22, and was buried in the Scotch burial ground.
University of Tasmania eprints
Link:https://eprints.utas.edu.au/10839/4/Judd-J5.pdf
DONOR: Judd, Thomas, Brownell, Thomas Coke, Propsting, Henry and Barnett, William 2010 , Reference to index of Judd & Brownell families miscellaneous items collected by Nancie Hewitt (nee Brownell) , University of Tasmania Library Special and Rare Materials Collection, Australia.
Read the full typescript of the diary here.

The progression of Elizabeth Judd's illness and her death on 30th December 1842 was recorded by her brother Thomas Judd in these entries:

On November 27th, 1842 he wrote:
Elizabeth is still very ill. Mr. Webber, a few days ago, laid a blister upon the back or her neck which, instead of getting better got worse, but we are in hope it may prevent a fit of illness.
On December 3rd, 1842 he wrote:
Saturday 3rd. Dec., Fine day. Father, myself, Elizabeth and Ann have been on shore this afternoon and are very much gratified, but seem to be at home when having got onto the ship again. Although Elizabeth was gratified and pleased with the land and dined and fed on shore, still she is very ill and her neck gets no better
. On December 7th, 1842 he wrote:
Wednesday 7th. Went to see a Mr. Carter today about a situation in his shop but did not engage but Mrs. C. enquired after Elizabeth and went and engaged her as Governess for her family but she is not able to go at present. I am sorry to say her neck and health is in a very bad state.
From that day until his sister Elizabeth's tragic death and burial, Thomas Judd wrote this distressing account:
Friday 9th [December]. Engaged with Mr. C. today for to go on Tuesday. Ann has engaged and is going on Tuesday also, in a very respectable family, as Companion and Governess to a small family.

Saturday 10th. Take a stroll into the bush. Very much gratified to see things in a state of nature. Found a great variety of the insect tribe - very different to those of England and very beautiful.

Tuesday 13th. Went to my situation today at Wellington House, Liverpool Street. Ann went to her's also. Elizabeth took a walk in the Garden last Friday but has been confined to her bed ever since. She has had a slight attack of rheumatism and is extremely weak. Father and John are not yet engaged. I am glad to say my situation is as comfortable as I can expect at first, but am unsettled at present. Elizabeth still continues to get worse and weak. Mr. Webber has attended her at present but, as he is going to leave with vessel in a day or two, we have another to attend her. Her neck does not heal in the least but discharges more, which weakens her much.

Wednesday 21st. Sir Charles Napier is gone to Bombay, a day or two ago. My dear sister Elizabeth is now in a very poor way of weakness, also her throat and tongue is very sore but we are in hopes she will recover over awhile.

Monday 26th Dec. Yesterday was Christmas Day. It is now the height of our summer and the depth of your winter. Gooseberries and currants &c. are now in season but dearer than in England.

Wednesday 28th. Went home today to see how E. was and found her, as I thought, a little better. She always expresses such a wish, if ever go home to be sure to see her. When I left her she expressed very strong marks of affection towards me but I did not notice it much at the time as I knew she was always very partial towards me.

Thursday 29th. Went home today to tell John I had a situation in view for him. Found E. much more lively and better. She said she could feel her neck healing, which pleased her much but her throat no better. She is not able to get up.

Friday 30th. Went home today to tell John he did not succeed yesterday. I had another in view for him. I counted on seeing E. today as I expected to find her much better, so I told a friend when going along, but when I got to the door I was met by John who said E. was fainting. I went in to see her and was very much grieved in finding her in the state she was. She lay quite still but gave several heavy sighs. I thought I would stand by and speak to her when she recovered. John and Father ran for the Surgeon. I called in our Land-lady for I thought it must be more than a fainting fit. As soon as she came in she discovered she was gone. Our dear sister Elizabeth is no more and we are left to lament her loss in a strange country.
As soon as the Surgeon came he said it was not her complaint that was the cause of her death, but a fit of Apoplexy. You must judge Father and John's surprise on their return and also my disappointment - but I hope what is our loss is her gain. She expired about half past twelve o'clock a.m. I am very sorry to think we had not the opportunity to enquire into the state of her mind but we little thought death was so near but I really have strong hopes for Elizabeth for I believe she was a sincere and pious girl and one that loved good things. She conducted herself with great propriety on board all the voyage, which was remarked by all and greatly respected. She was a great advocate for the prayer meetings which were continued all the voyage. But I must leave her in the hands of her Maker, humbly praying that he will have mercy upon her soul and that it may be a warning of great effect to us.
This affair quite cut poor Mother up but I hope she will be enabled to get through it. It is a great grief to us all, in fact, I never had anything play upon my spirits so much before but hope all things are ordered for the best.

On Monday Jan.2nd. 1843 we buried our dear Sister in the Scotch Burying Ground, to remain there until the latter day when we must all meet again, but her soul is not there. I hope it is far better off than it was here.

As a last token or respect I should like to have a stone monument erected for her so that she will not be forgotten although in a strange land.
This is sufficient to teach us the vanity of setting our minds on earthly things, for it appeared to us as if providence was pleased to set upon us before but, alas! all is vanity, but I hope it will prove for our souls eternal welfare.
Transcribed by D. Little 2nd July 1953
Link: https://sparc.utas.edu.au/uploads/r/special-and-rare-collections/9/5/3/95349fce4cce26c679e13f32133c6791afa0adb70eebfb3c163f60bd58278256/J5-1-JUDD-diary-1842.pdf


Joseph and Rebecca THOMAS (formerly Judd) 1860s
Joseph Thomas (c.1810-1890) married Rebecca Judd (1827-1864) in Franklin [Tasmania] in 1852. Rebecca Judd was the daughter of Thomas Judd and Elizabeth Cane.
Children: Wilbraham Henry (1853-1934), Elizabeth Alice (1855), Arthur Judd (1858-1926) and Rebecca Judd (1864). Rebecca Thomas née Judd died at Port Cygnet in 1864 aged 36. Joseph Thomas was elected a trustee of the first Port Cygnet Road Trust in 1856. In 1859, he was elected chairman of the Trust. He owned a farm (166 acres) at Agnes Rivulet after 1865. Described as a fruit-grower, he died in Port Cygnet in 1890, aged 80 (death notice Mercury 3 January 1891: "On December 31, at Agnes Rivulet, Port Cygnet, Joseph Thomas, aged 80 years.")
Source: https://portcygnet.free.fr/names.htm#T

Joseph THOMAS, cdv by T. J. Nevin 1860s

Subject: Joseph THOMAS (1810-1890)
Photographer: Thomas J. NEVIN (1842-1923)
Location: City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart
Date: late 1860s - 1869 - 1870
Format: carte-de-visite, vignetted portrait on plain mount
Condition: good overall, fingerprints
Provenance: The Huon & New Norfolk Historical Photo Album (diannetam67, ancestry.com.au)
Verso: Studio stamp: T. Nevin late A. Bock, identified for sale, DSFB, Hobart Book Fair, Feb 11-13, 2011

Key dates in the life of Joseph THOMAS
1810: ca. birth - exact date and location not known
1850: LAND 20 acres Huon Valley
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/RD1-1-24$init=RD1-1-24P174JPG 1850
1851: CENSUS - farmer, Franklin - two males resident- not yet married, married in 1852
1852: MARRIAGE 1852 11 Feb Hobart Town reg- farmer, marriage to Rebecca Judd , witnesses Martha Smith (formerly JUDD?), sister, and brothers Henry and William JUDD. Ceremony by W. Barnett, Independent Chapel Franklin
1857: CENSUS - Agnes Rivulet - 4 persons - page 2 shows he was not transported. - occupation farmer
Female child under 2 yrs
Male child between 7 and 14 yrs
Male and female between 45 and 60 yrs All Protestant
1853-1864: CHILDREN
Wilbraham Henry THOMAS (1853-1934)
Elizabeth Alice THOMAS (1855)
Arthur Judd THOMAS(1858-1926)
Amelia Rebecca Judd THOMAS (1864 -1864).
1864: DEATH of wife Rebecca (b. Judd 1827) 4 Feb
1889: DEATH of old age, 80 yrs old, 30 December at Port Cygnet
1891: WILL - one page
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/AD960-1-19-3991$init=AD960-1-19-3991_1

MARRIAGE to Rebecca JUDD 1851



Thomas, Joseph
Record Type: Marriages
Gender: Male
Age: Adult
Spouse: Judd, Rebecca
Gender: Female
Age: Adult
Date of marriage: 11 Feb 1852
Registered: Hobart
Registration year: 1852
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:843899
Resource: RGD37/1/11 no 627
Archives Office of Tasmania
Link:https://stors.tas.gov.au/NI/843899

Rebecca THOMAS nee Judd at Port Cygnet
According to these registrations of births and deaths, Joseph Thomas' wife Rebecca Thomas nee Judd (1827-1864) died of pulmonary consumption at Port Cygnet on 4th February 1864. She was 37 years old. Her brother Henry Judd (1836-1916) registered her death the next day. She had given birth to a daughter a week earlier, naming her Rebecca Judd Thomas. According to one family source, this was her fourth and last child after Wilbraham Henry Thomas (b 1853), Elizabeth Alice Thomas (b. 1855), and Arthur Judd Thomas (b. 1858). The child was christened Amelia Rebecca Judd Thomas but died within weeks of the birth (other sources: see familysearch.org)



Thomas, Rebecca Judd
Record Type: Births
Gender: Female
Mother: Judd, Rebecca
Date of birth: 26 Jan 1864
Registered: Port Cygnet
Registration year: 1864
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1111275
Resource: RGD33/1/42 no 1436
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/RGD33-1-42$init=RGD33-1-42P197



Thomas, Rebecca
Record Type: Deaths
Gender: Female
Age: 37
Date of death: 04 Feb 1864
Registered: Port Cygnet
Registration year: 1864
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1205429
Resource: RGD35/1/33 no 416
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/NI/1205429

John NEVIN snr at Port Cygnet
John Nevin snr (1808-1887) was born at Grey Abbey, Ireland and served with the Royal Scots 1st Regiment of Foot in the West Indies from 1825 to 1838. He then served at the Canadian Rebellions from 1839 until 1841 when he was invalided out first to the hospital at Chelsea, England, and thence to Ireland. He married Mary Ann Dickson, pursued the vocation of gardener in his wife's brother's business, Alexander Dickson's nurseries at Newtonards, taught school, and contributed to journals with surveyor John Hurst, proprietor of the Freeman newspaper. He arrived at Hobart in July 1852 as a pensioner guard on board the Fairlie with his wife and four children all under 12 years old: Thomas James Nevin, Rebecca Jane Nevin; Mary Ann Nevin; and William John (aka Jack) Nevin.

John Nevin snr was granted ten acres one rood and seventeen perches in 1859 in the shire of Buckingham, near Cradoc and Port Cygnet in the Parish of Bedford on the Huon River. Although he was able to settle his wife and their four children on the grant near Port Cygnet, he settled them instead on land granted to Dr. E.S.P. Bedford situated just above the Lady Franklin Museum at Kangaroo Valley (now Lenah Valley, Hobart). He was employed by the Trustees of the Wesleyan Church to teach school at Kangaroo Valley. He was also granted permission to use the one acre of land there on which to establish orchards and build a house. John Nevin snr resided at Kangaroo Valley until his death in 1887, firstly with his wife Mary Ann Dickson and young family, and four years after her death in 1875, with his second wife Martha Nevin nee Genge and his grandchild Minnie Carr (daughter of his deceased daughter Mary Ann Carr nee Nevin, 1847-1878).

The land grant served John Nevin snr and his family well as a source of fruit and vegetables, a place to cultivate orchards and even make jam for export. In 1870 he exhibited marrows at the Industrial Bazaar at the Hobart Town Hall where eldest son Thomas J. Nevin also exhibited a series of landscape photographs. In 1873 John Nevin snr presented an exhibit of peat to a meeting of the Royal Society of Tasmania, and in 1877, he exported jam on the Southern Cross to the colony of Victoria. The peat may have been extracted from the area where he resided with his family at Kangaroo Valley (near New Town, now Lenah Valley), known originally as Sassafras Gully in the 1840s, a valley rich with the type of flora that grows as ‘wet’ and/or mixed forest in Tasmania. Although his sons Thomas and Jack (William John) showed little propensity for farming, John Nevin snr retained the land grant for nearly twenty years before selling it.

Thomas NEVIN at Port Cygnet
The area was also reputed to be a source of gold. In April 1869, eldest son photographer Thomas J. Nevin, with friends John Thorpe jun, former licensee of the Bush Inn at Port Cygnet, and Duncan Chisholm, school master at Rokeby, Clarence Plains, went prospecting for gold in the district around the old mine at Mt. Mary. They found small quantities and were confident enough of finding more to suggest to the press that a subsidy from local residents would encourage them to continue with further exploration. While at Port Cygnet, Thomas Nevin photographed some of these local identities, including Joseph THOMAS, whose portrait (above) he printed as a vignette.

Five years before John Nevin snr died in 1887, he sold the whole ten acres (10 acres, 1 rood, 17 perches) of his land granted in 1859 at Cygnet to Thomas Genge. The sale was registered on the 26th January 1882 for £10 (ten pounds). Thomas Genge was a successor ( a son or nephew perhaps) of John Nevin's close friend and fellow Wesleyan, William Genge (1808-1881), Chapel keeper, sexton and stonemason who had died aged 73 yrs, on 16th January 1881, one year previously.

DEATH of Joseph THOMAS at Port Cygnet



Thomas, Joseph
Record Type: Deaths
Gender: Male
Age: 80
Date of death: 31 Dec 1890
Registered: Port Cygnet
Registration year: 1890
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1238017
Resource: RGD35/1/59 no 1079
Archives Office of Tasmania
Link: https://stors.tas.gov.au/NI/1238017

POLLUTION of the AGNES RIVULET 1891
Joseph Thomas died of old age at Port Cygnet, according to his death registration. His health was most likely compromised daily by the water supply he was drinking which was deemed by the Board of Health to be unfit for human consumption. An epidemic of typhoid in Tasmania claimed the life of photographer Thomas J. Nevin's brother, Constable John Nevin, in 1891 at the Hobart Gaol. The sources and causes of diseases and death in the Agnes River district near Port Cygnet was the topic of a report presented to the Tasmanian Parliament in October 1890:
1891. PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA.
AGNES RIVULET, NEAR PORT CYGNET:REPORT BY THE SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD OF HEALTH.
RIVERS POLLUTION AND OBSTRUCTION.
To the Honourable the President and the Members of the Central Board of Health.
GENTLEMEN,
I HAVE the honour to call your attention to the appended papers relating to the condition of the Agnes Rivulet at Port Cygnet. The papers consist of a letter dated 11th October, 1890, from the Secretary of the Local Board of Health, with an extract from the minutes of the meeting of the said Board, containing a resolution that a "petition from the inhabitants pointing out the dangerous state of the Agnes Rivulet be forwarded to the Secretary of the Central Board of Health, and earnestly requesting that steps may be taken at once to have the rivulet cleared out;" and the petition referred to, which sets forth that the inhabitants have during summer to get their supply of water from the rivulet, which at that season becomes quite unfit for domestic purposes by reason "of decayed matter and fallen leaves from willows growing along its banks;" and praying that "prompt and efficient measures" be taken "to have this evil removed."
I was at Port Cygnet from the 17th to the 20th of this current month, and took the opportunity of examining the Agnes Rivulet. The main stream of this rivulet is shown to rise in the high lands to the north-eastward of the township, and, after a course of about seven miles, falls into Port Cygnet, at the town of Lovett. The upper part of its course is through lands reserved under the Mineral Lands Act, and which are not taken up nor settled upon. Thence it runs through lands allotted originally to pensioners, and receives affluents draining similar lands : these allotments are partially settled upon. The lower course of the stream is through alluvial land, and both banks are occupied by farmsteads, cottages, orchards, and gardens.
Along its whole course through settled lands the rivulet banks are planted with willows, whose roots greatly impede its flow, and whose branches hang down into the water. These impediments arrest the logs that are brought down by floods, and, consequently, the banks are continually being overflowed. The leaves falling every year from the willows also add to the evil by increasing the impediments as well as polluting the water. The adjoining lands and roads, and the houses and farmsteads of the neighbourhood have no other outfall for their drainage than the rivulet, and, therefore, every heavy rain carries manure and other impurities into the stream. Furthermore, as the lower course of the rivulet is through rich alluvium, some of the banks are continually falling and greatly discolouring and spoiling the water. The statements contained in the petition as to the condition of the rivulet are therefore quite true.
With respect to the prayer of the petition, it is evident that prompt and efficient measures should be taken to remedy the state of the rivulet. But the only way in which the Central Board can assist in the matter is, if it thinks fit, to bring the case under the notice of the Government. As, however, the case is by no means a singular one, for all over the country there are streams that are similarly impeded and polluted, I would suggest that the River Pollution Act of 1881 should be amended so as to bring such cases within its purview. This might be done by giving Local Authorities (as defined by that Act) powers to cause the clearing out of streams at the expense of the riverain proprietors, and to make by-laws in respect of the impediments created by tree-planting, &c.
I would further suggest that, as the clearing out of this rivulet would only temporarily improve the water supply, as the stream is, as above shown, liable to continual pollution, the inhabitants of the district should form a Water Trust for the purpose of bringing pure water from the upper district where no sources of pollution exist. If desired, I can furnish data. to show that such a scheme is quite within their means.
Hobart, 27th October, 1890.
I have the honour to remain,
Gentlemen,
Your faithful Servant,
A. MAUL
WILLIAM THOMAS STRUTT,
GOVERMENT PRINTER, TASMANIA
Source: Report No. 169, Parliament of Tasmania
Link: https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/tpl/PPWeb/1891/1891pp169.pdf

Addenda
1: Judd family photographs
These photographs of members of the JUDD, BARNETT, PROPSTING and THOMAS families were among 140 or more photographs sold at the Douglas Stewart Fine Books Fair (DSFB), Hobart, 2011 in a pair of albums containing one or more photographs by Thomas J. Nevin, printed verso with his most common studio stamp, "T. Nevin Late A. Bock" to indicate his succession to Alfred Bock's business and studio at The City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town from 1867 until early 1876. According to notes and information supplied by DSFB, the albums included the following:
140 + family portrait photographs in carte-de-visite and cabinet card formats. Identified sitters include William Barnett of Clifton House, New Norfolk, Tasmania, 1864 / Anna Barnett, Clifton House, New Norfolk, 2nd daughter of Thomas & Elizabeth Judd, Franklin, River Huon, 1864; Mr W.H. Thomas, Agnes Rivulet, Port Cygnet (early 1860s), and John Hay of Southport. Photographic studios represented include those of Frith, Nevin (late A. Bock), Spurling, J. Bishop Osborne, Winter, Wherrett, Riise & Barnett, Woolley and Anson Bros ...." etc etc



DSFB Fair, Hobart 2011 Catalogue notes

The two albums were purchased by Dianne Tam who uploaded several photographs with minimal information to ancestry.com, which she originally titled -
THE HUON NEW NORFOLK HISTORICAL PHOTO ALBUM RESEARCH PROJECT-TASMANIA.IN WONDERFUL COLLABERATION [sic] WITH HELEN BOUTELL & ERIC MOBBS. Owner/Researcher/Compiler: "diannetam67".
In a comment Dianne Tam added to one of these photos, the unattributed full-length portrait (below) of William Barnett, husband of Anne Judd, she claimed she was helping descendants. Had she also uploaded scans of the versos of these photographs bearing photographers' studio marks, the problems of identification could have been halved. The photographer in this instance can be identified by the plinth, the huge urn, the carpet and the toning as Frederick Frith (1819-1871), taken ca. 1862, at his Murray St. studio, Hobart. A photo of his wife Ann Judd was taken in the same session - see below.


William Barnett Clifton House New Norfolk Tasmania 1864
This Photo is included in both Albums which consist of over 140 Huon & New Norfolk Photographs ranging from 1840-1890's Tasmania. Few are identified. I would like to help the Desecendents [sic] of the Hay Judd Thomas and Barnett Families find their Ancestors. So, any help to identify these wonderful Photos is welcomed. diannetam67

Note: diannetam67 originally shared this on 26 Feb 2011
https://www.ancestrylibrary.com.au/mediaui-viewer/tree/19584058/person/831597472/media/448d49a9-9e5d-4756-89c0-c970baf44977 [login required]
Errors of identification, therefore, rest with the original purchaser "diannetam67".

Paterfamilias Thomas JUDD snr
Father of the Judd family on board the Sir Charles Napier (1842)
Thomas JUDD (1794-1887) snr lived to the grand age of 93 yrs.



Thomas JUDD snr (1794-1887)
Birth: 29 May 1794, Barkway, Hertfordshire, England
Marriage: 15 December 1819, Elmdon, Essex, England to Elizabeth Cane (1793–1864)

JUDD CHILDREN as adults - siblings of diarist Thomas JUDD.
These photographs of Thomas JUDD's siblings may or may not have been correctly identified by the purchasers of the original two albums in 2011, or indeed those family members who subsequently linked to them on sites such as ancestry.com and familysearch.org once they were uploaded by Dianne Tam. Missing are images of Thomas Judd's sisters Elizabeth Judd, unmarried, who died in December 1842 soon after arrival at Hobart, Susan Judd who died in 1851, and Rebecca Judd, wife of Joseph THOMAS, who died in childbirth in 1864. Joseph THOMAS, husband of Rebecca Judd sat for the portrait (above) included in this album, taken by Thomas J. NEVIN ca. 1869 at Port Cygnet, and Henry and Isabella Judd may have visited Thomas Nevin's studio ca. 1869 for this portrait:



Photo: Henry Judd (1836-1916) brother of diarist Thomas Judd jnr, with wife Isabella Murdoch Williamson, married at New Norfolk, 20th April 1861.

This may be another photograph taken by Thomas J. Nevin ca. 1869 from the Judd family album.

Source of Henry and Isabella Judd photo: https://www.geni.com/people/Henry-Judd/6000000029478880049
Judd family private collections, www.ancestry.com

BDM notes:

PARENTS:
1. Thomas JUDD senior (1794-1887) BIRTH 29 MAY 1794 • Hertfordshire, England DEATH 7 AUG 1887 • Mt Pleasant, Franklin, Tasmania, Australia

Spouse: Elizabeth Cane 1793–1864 BIRTH 22 MAY 1793 • Elmdon, Essex, England DEATH 09 AUG 1864 • Franklin, Tasmania, Australia

CHILDREN:

1.1. Elizabeth Judd (1820-1842) BIRTH 21 OCT 1820 • Barkway, Hertfordshire, England DEATH 31 DEC 1842 • Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

Spouse (none)

1.2. Thomas Judd junior (1822-1915) BIRTH 3 APR 1822 • Barkway, Hertfordshire, England DEATH 24 MAY 1915 • Kew, Victoria, Australia, son of Thomas Judd and Elizabeth Cane

Spouse?

1.3. John Cane Judd (1823-1888)

Spouse: Amelia Ann Morey (1835-1901)

1.4. Anne Judd (1825–1879) BIRTH 1 FEB 1825 • Barkway, Hertfordshire, England DEATH 30 AUG 1879 • Campbell Town, Tasmania, Australia



Anne Judd (1825-1879), wife of William Barnett
This photograph was taken by Frederick Frith ca. 1862 in the same session as the photo (above) of her husband William Barnett.

Spouse: William Barnett (1821–1888) BIRTH 19 MAR 1821 • Westminster, London, England DEATH 23 AUG 1888 • Campbell Town, Tasmania, Australia (see photo of William above)

1.5. Rebecca Judd (1826-1864)

Spouse: Joseph Thomas (ca. 1810 -1890) - see photo by Thomas Nevin etc above

This is possibly a photograph of Wilbraham Thomas, son of Rebecca and Joseph Thomas.



Wilbraham Thomas, son of Joseph and Rebecca Thomas (no date, no attribution)
Possibly taken ca. mid 1880s, 45 yrs old?
Wilbraham THOMAS (1853–1934)
Birth: 16 February 1853 Hobart, Tasmania
Death: 16 July1934 Hobart General Hospital

1.6. Susan Judd (1830-1851)

Spouse?

1.7. Martha Judd (1831 -1917)

Spouse: Smith?



Photo: Martha Judd m. Smith? (1831 -1917), sister of Thomas, Elizabeth, Thomas, John, Susan, Rebecca, Henry JUDD
Photograph unattributed, Judd family private collections, www.ancestrylibrary.com

1.8. Henry Judd (1836-1916)

Spouse: Isabella Murdoch Williamson 1836–1922 BIRTH 10 APR 1836 • New Town, Tasmania, Australia DEATH 14 OCT 1922 • Franklin, Tasmania, Australia house at Brookside Judbury Huonville.



Photo: Henry Judd (1836-1916) brother of diarist Thomas Judd jnr, with wife Isabella Murdoch Williamson, married at New Norfolk, 20th April 1861.
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin ca. 1869 - stamp verso (?)

GRAVESTONE of Judd family buried at Cornelian Bay Hobart.



Sources: ancestry.com; familysearch.org

Addenda 2: more from the spy George O'Brien
The following information was sourced and cited in full directly from this site:
Familypedia: William Lee (c1799-1864)
Link: https://familypedia.wikia.org/wiki/William_Lee_(c1799-1864)

"Bounty Immigrants - "Sir Charles Napier," a case study
Bounty immigrants were to have their fare paid by the Government of the Colony after arriving in New South Wales. Ships left from Plymouth or Liverpool and immigrants needed to make their own way to the port of departure. Immigrants applied to a shipping-agent who paid for their passage and hoped to make a profit on their fare when they later received the bounty from the Government. Once the immigrants arrived in the Colony, however, a decision was made as to their suitability. If they were deemed unsuitable and their bounty payment was refused they then owed the shipping-agent for their passage and began their new life in the Colony in debt.

The bounty being paid in 1842 when the Sir Charles Napier arrived in NSW was:
£19 per adult, or child 16 and over
£15 per child aged 15
£10 per child aged 7-14
£ 5 per child aged 1-6
£ 0 per child under 12m

The bounty list for the Sir Charles Napier lists those passengers for which the bounty was to be paid and those passengers for which the bounty was refused. The reasons for disallowing the bounty were kept in a separate book. Investigations were held into the suitability of the immigrants, and the investigation for the Sir Charles Napier has survived in a volume that is today titled Immigration Board: Reports by Immigration Board on complaints of Immigrants about their passage, 1838-87 that is held in the NSW State Records. This investigation shows that bounties could be refused on moral grounds.

Immigrants could also be called before the Immigration Board in order to give evidence against other passengers. One passenger from the Sir Charles Napier who gave evidence was George O’Brien, from Ireland, who had sailed with his wife and 5 children. (He described himself when giving evidence as having 6 children. Perhaps and elder child did not immigrate with them.)

The investigation of the bounty passengers on the Sir Charles Napier shows that people often gave incorrect information to increase their chances of being accepted for the bounty. The most common incorrect information was for adults to understate their age, but this could rarely be disputed. Giving an incorrect age therefore was not often able to be used as a reason for refusal of the bounty.

Some people assumed another identity or status to travel to New South Wales. The second most common incorrect information then was to travel under an assumed name. This could rarely be disputed, but when it was able to be disputed was sometimes part of why a bounty was refused on moral grounds.

Incorrect information that was regarded as abuse of the bounty system and used to refuse the bounty for passengers on the Sir Charles Napier included:
A single man and married woman with 2 children pretending to be a married couple. This woman was immigrating with her 2 children to join her husband who was a convict in the Colony.
A married woman pretending to be single (and understating her age) and having another family pretend that her son was their son. This woman was immigrating with her son to join her husband who was a convict in the Colony.
A married woman who pretended to be single and gave birth to a baby during the voyage. She was married to a soldier and was immigrating to join him.
A married couple bringing with them a 5 year old child that was not theirs.

Transcription of evidence of George O’Brien re voyage of Sir Charles Napier, 1842.
Added to the transcription are details in brackets about the person from the Bounty Immigrants list. These details were not in the evidence given.
Any other comments that have been added are also in brackets
All but 2 of the Immigrants against whom George O’Brien gave evidence, and any of their children, were disallowed the bounty for their passage. The 2 who were allowed their passage were one of the Scully’s and the Guyan who had been tried for murder. The Scully whose bounty was disallowed appears later in the evidence and had his bounty refused on moral grounds.

George O’Brien a married man Bounty Immigrant by “Sir Charles Napier” called in and examined –

I am a married man I have a wife and six children.

I heard some conversations on board between Kings County people and the Sailors, which induced me to keep a case of pistols about me. I heard four of them, two men named Scully and a man named Guynan and another whose name I do not recall say, that they were tried for the murder of Mr Biddulph, and owing to some contradictory evidence, they were liberated on bail.

I knew a man on board called Flynn (Thomas Flyn, 24, Farm labourer, RC, Dublin – in list of with Anne Hartford), he told me he was a single man, there was a woman on board who had some children with her. She passed as Flynn’s wife, but was not so, as I heard from Flynn. I knew Mrs Flynn alias Hartford (Anne Hartford, 37, House Servant, RC, Dublin, Paul 15, Rosanna 11) to be coming out to her husband who I heard was a prisoner here.

I knew a woman on board named Anne Chambers (26, Servant, RC, Kings County, bounty disallowed) she shipped as a single woman but she told me she was married and had a child on board, passing as a child of Patrick Cummins (George Cummins 13) and that she was coming out to her husband who was a prisoner of the Crown.

I knew a single girl named Jane Bryan (25, House Servant, RC, Queens County, bounty disallowed), she was delivered of a male child on board. I heard her say that she was a married woman and that her husband was a prisoner here. I knew Matthew Bryan (26, Labourer, RC, Queens County), who passed as Jane Bryan’s brother. I heard Matthew Bryan acknowledge that he was the father of the child of which Jane was delivered on board.

Mary Flood (19, House Servant, RC, Liverpool) I do not think was a good girl. She could never be kept away from the sailors.

Isabella Thompson (18, House Servant, Prot, Liverpool) & Rachel Thompson (22, Laundress, Prot, Liverpool, bounty disallowed) were also incorrect.

I think Mary Shaw (18, House Servant, Prot, Liverpool) an incorrect girl. She came on board in the workhouse dress.

I think Jane Perry (20, House servant, Prot, Liverpool, bounty disallowed) an incorrect girl.

I knew Catherine Murphy (20, Domestic Servant, RC, Sydney NSW), she was a most barefaced girl. I have seen her lying in a bed in the hospital with Watson Third Mate. I have also seen her in the green-house on deck in very improper situations with Watson.

I knew Hannah Plunkett (18, House Servant, RC, Dublin). I have seen a very undue intimacy between Pemberton and her. I have seen them on deck with a Cloak folded about them.

I knew Mary Carroll (22, Servant, RC, Kings County) a single girl. I have seen Asken one of the Officers of the vessel with this girl in his berth in the green-house in such a position as no proper girl would admit.

I knew Elizabeth Bradley (22, Dressmaker, Prot, Kilkerry). I do not think her a correct girl. I have seen Richard Wheeler a sailor on board in bed with her – he slept with her for nearly two months during the voyage. The constables on board took no steps to prevent this conduct, as she had an apartment of her own partitioned off from the other Immigrants, for which accommodation she paid the Agent in Dublin. Her uncle told me she was a married woman, that her husband had £500 per annum in Ireland, that he was obliged to separate from her owing to her conduct and grant her an allowance of £30 per year. She is now living on the bounty of this sailor.

I knew Esther Toole (23, House Servant, RC, Dublin). She came on board a single girl but was delivered of a male child on board. She said she was married to a soldier, that he was out here, and that she hoped to find him.

I knew Margaret Wickham (19, Dressmaker, RC, Dublin). I have seen this girl permit the Captain to take liberties with her at night. I have seen him keep her on deck.

I have never sent the Doctor guilty of any undue familiarity or freedom with any of the Immigrants. I was by when one of the Immigrants named Kerry threatened the Doctor for endeavouring to check the immorality that existed on board. I heard him say “The big bellied Quack ought to be thrown overboard and the Ship sunk.” I have frequently heard the Doctor tell the present Captain and sailors that they could not be permitted to go between decks. I have heard the sailors say that as the Captain took liberties with a girl, so they would, having as much liberty ask to do so.

The vessel was dirty when we left Liverpool.

I have heard the Doctor always insist on the Immigrants always getting their allowance of provisions. I heard one of the Mates giving the Doctor the lie when asking for the Immigrants rights.

I have seen the Captain and some of the Officers frequently drunk during the voyage, but I never saw the Doctor in that way during the voyage. The Second Mate named Asken I have seen drunk almost every day. I have seen him lifted up with a rope from between decks drunk.

The ship was on fire on one occasion, which was caused by one of the Officers named Watson and two of the Immigrants going down to draw off spirits with a light when the spirits ignited. We had to rip up the deck in different places and pour down water. If it were not for the First Mate named Hargraves and one of the Immigrants we would never have come to Sydney.

I knew Charles Arkinson (18, Grazier, Farmer & Labourer, Prot, Cumberland) and Elizabeth Brockell (26, Dairy Maid, Prot, Lancashire). They lived together during the voyage as man and wife.

I knew Edward Bigam (24, Labourer, Prot, Kildare) and Margaret Dobbins (22, House Servant, RC, Queens County). After the first month they always lived on board as man and wife.

I never would allow or advise any persons to permit females to come out in any Immigrant ship unless protected by their own immediate relation.

I knew Mary Malone (Mary Kilfoyle, 22, Farm Servant, RC Kildare). She came out as a daughter of John Kilfoil, but I heard Kilfoil say she was not his daughter, and that she was conducting herself so badly on board he would have nothing to say to her.

I believe Mary Flood (19, Farm Servant, RC, Liverpool) is now on the streets of Sydney. (That is she is working as a prostitute.)

I knew Ann Watkins (19, House Maid, RC, Dublin). I understand from the happenings that she was not the sister or any relative of Patrick Watkins.

I knew Elizabeth Cummins (19, Nurse Maid, RC, Kings County). I do not believe Cummins to be her name.

I have seen John Scully (29, Farm Labourer, RC, Kings County) lying in the berth with Sarah Acres (21, Servant, Prot, Kings County).

I knew Joshua Abbotson. He had a child on board passed as his own, but I do not know, nor did I hear to whom it belonged. It does not belong to Abbotson. (Amelia, 5)

The biscuit was very indifferent.

I came out as an agricultural labourer. I had a Public House in Dublin for the last five years. Major Browne paid £12 for my passage to come out here. I had the option to come out here or go to America. I preferred coming here.

Cross examined by Mr Ronald: I have seen Mary Flood, Isabella and Rachel Thompson, Mary Shaw and Jane Perry permit the sailors to put their heads in their bosoms and elsewhere and in fact to handle them as they wished. I heard the Rachel Thompson was caught under the long-boat in an improper situation. The present Captain would not permit the regular allowance of water to be given out and it was not until the last month of the voyage that the Captain would permit the scale of provisions to be pout on the storehouse door. The £12 paid for me was paid in Mr Byrnes office in Liverpool.
(Signed) George O’Brien

Immigration Board: Reports by Immigration Board on complaints of Immigrants about their passage, 1838-87. "[end of article cited in full from William Lee page at familypedia.com with thanks to the page's author]

RELATED POSTS main weblog