Showing posts with label Clothing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clothing. Show all posts

Studio portraits by T. J. Nevin 1860s-1870s, gifts of John McPhee to the National Gallery of Victoria

Gifts to the NGV Melbourne from the private collection of John McPHEE
Studio portraits by Thomas J. NEVIN 1860s-1870s, Hobart Tasmania

John McPhee 2023 QVMAG

John McPhee at QVMAG, Friday 24 March 2023
Photo © QVMAG Arts Foundation 2023

John McPhee: a few key dates
Noted curator and director:
1974-1978: Curator of Art at the QVMAG at Royal Park, Launceston, Tasmania
1980-1992: Founding Curator of Australian decorative arts and Senior Curator of Australian art at the National Gallery of Australia, Canberra
1992-1996: Deputy Director at the National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne

Noted author and editor:
1980: The Art of John Glover (South Melbourne, Vic. : Macmillan)
2007: The painted portrait photograph in Tasmania 1850-1900 (Launceston, Tas. : Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery)
2008: Joseph Lycett: Convict Artist (ed. Sydney : Historic Houses Trust of New South Wales)

1977: curator of T. J. Nevin's mugshots at the QVMAG exhibition
Several hundred photographs of Tasmanian prisoners (termed "convicts" in tourism discourse) taken by government contractor Thomas J. Nevin at the Hobart Gaol in the 1870s were salvaged in the early 1900s by John Watt Beattie from deteriorating official prison and police records. Beattie's government commission as both landscape photographer and collector of Aboriginal relics and convict realia was the commercial promotion of Tasmania's unique scenery and penal heritage at intercolonial exhibitions where such items were offered for sale despite their provenance as government property.

Considered by Beattie as fine examples of studio portraiture by professional photographer T. J. Nevin despite their original purpose as mugshots taken for police in the 1870s, he displayed them in albums and on wall charts at his "Port Arthur Museum" located at 51 Murray St. Hobart in the 1900s. Beattie's catalogue of 1916 offered 40 uncut prisoner cdv's for sale pasted in three panels. Dozens more mugshots and prison records including his own reproductions were displayed in travelling exhibitions associated with the fake convict ship Success during the 1900s-1920s. On Beattie's death in 1930, the 300 or so prisoner cdv's in his collection were acquired by the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery (QVMAG), Launceston.

Those extant or remaining cdv's from Beattie's collection were exhibited in the 1970s at the Art Gallery of NSW (1976) and at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery (1977), curated by John McPhee. His interest in Thomas J. Nevin as a jobbing photographer of the 1860s-1870s extended to collecting other examples of Nevin's work wherever and whenever they were on offer.

T. Nevin convict photographs QVMAG 1977

Convict photos at Launceston
Hobart Mercury March 10th, 1977

TRANSCRIPT
Convict photos at Launceston
HISTORIC photographs showing convicts at Port Arthur in 1874 will be exhibited at the Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery at Launceston from tomorrow to May 2.
The work of T. J. Nevin, the photos are being shown at Launceston for the first time.
Many of the men shown in the picture had been transported to Port Arthur as young boys 40 years earlier.
The curator of fine art at the museum, Mr John McPhee, said yesterday that the photos has "a quality far beyond that of records."
"Just once rascally, occasionally noble, always pathetic, these photographs are among the most moving and powerful images of the human condition," he said.

Read more about the 1970s exhibitions here:

As an example: this cdv of prisoner James Martin taken by T. J. Nevin in October 1874 at the Hobart Gaol was among more than fifty formerly housed at the QVMAG in Beattie's collection, Launceston, until it was removed and displayed at an exhibition at the Port Arthur Heritage site for the Port Arthur Conservation and Development Project (PACDP) in 1983. It was numbered on the front under the image "183" for relocation, and returned not to Beattie's collection at the QVMAG but to the TMAG in Hobart where it is currently held.



Prisoner James MARTIN
Photographed on 24th October 1874 at the H.M. Goal, Hobart
Photographer: Thomas J. Nevin
Numbered "183" on recto in 1983
Numbered "224" on verso in 1915
Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery: TMAG Ref: Q15614

2003: cdv by T. Nevin gifted by John McPhee to the NGV
In 2003 John McPhee donated this cdv of an unidentified woman wearing a bonnet with a pink bow to the National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne. It is currently displayed online at the NGV in cropped format. Responding to our request in 2016 to see the full cdv mount recto and the inscriptions verso, the NGV provided both (below), which we have since included in several posts.



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (woman wearing a bonnet with a pink bow), carte-de-visite
(1865-1867)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/artist/13260/

Accession Number 2003.395
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Presented through the NGV Foundation by John McPhee, Member, 2003
This digital record has been made available on NGV Collection Online through the generous support of Professor AGL Shaw AO Bequest
Gallery location Not on display



Note the number "314", pencilled on upper right on this cdv's verso, was not mentioned in the catalogue notes when the NGV accessioned it in 2003, whereas the numbers 312, 313, 315, 316, 317, 318 pencilled on the versos of five from the same set of those accessioned in 2020 are duly noted (see below).



National Gallery of Victoria Catalogue Notes
No title (woman wearing a bonnet with a pink bow), carte-de-visite
(1865-1867)
T. NEVIN, Hobart
Medium albumen silver photograph, watercolour
Measurements 9.5 × 5.8 cm (image and support)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Inscription printed in ink on support on reverse c. AD ALTIORA / CITY PHOTOGRAPHIC ESTABLISHMENT / T. NEVIN. / LATE / A. BOCK. / 140 ELIZABETH ST / HOBART TOWN. / Further copies / can be obtained at / any time.
Accession Number 2003.395
Department Australian Photography Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Presented through the NGV Foundation by John McPhee, Member, 2003

This cdv of a woman wearing a bonnet with a pink bow by T. Nevin was published in the accompanying catalogue to the exhibition Who Are You: Australian Portraiture held at the NGV in 2022.

ho Are You: Australian Portraiture NGV 2022

Who Are You: Australian Portraiture, pps 164-165
A selection of photographs by contributor Wesley Enoch.
Caption:
(left to right) T. Nevin, Hobart No Title (woman wearing a bonnet with a pink bow), carte-de-visite 1865-67 National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
John Bishop-Osborne No title (Child standing on a chair and holding a whip), carte-de-visite 1879-83 National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Burman & Co., Melbourne No title (Man) , carte-de-visite 1876-77 National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
James E. Bray Madame Sibly, Phrenologists and mesmerist ca. 1870 National Portrait Gallery, Canberra


2020: ten T. Nevin cdv's gifted by John McPhee to the NGV
In 2020 John McPhee donated another ten studio portraits by Thomas J. Nevin from his collection through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program. Those ten, only recently "discovered" online at the NGV by this weblog, now include them here, but since none of these ten cdv's bears distinctive descriptive titles -i.e. the NGV has catalogued each with "NO TITLE" and the barest of bare information in parentheses, e.g. No title (Boy) etc, - we have devised a title for each which indexes something in the image to identify it beyond the gender of the sitter.

Although these ten cdv's which the NGV acquired in 2020 now appear online arranged in a sequence according to their accession numbers - e.g. 2020.365 to 2020.373 - we have rearranged them here to form three groups: Group A and Group B are full-length portraits which differ in terms of one key studio furnishing - the carpet. Group C are upper-body cdv portraits printed in an oval mount.

Group A features the thick carpet with squares bordered in white with a central motif;
Group B features the thin floor-covering (tapis) with a lozenge and chain link pattern; and
Group C features full-frontal portraits of the sitter's upper body, hands not visible

The advantage in this arrangement is two-fold: it helps to establish approximately the year of the sitters' studio visit based on Nevin's technical expertise and resources ; and secondly, it could assist in seeing relationships between sitters, possibly family members, photographed separately but possibly in the same session on the same day. Portraits in Group A were taken in the late 1860s about the time Nevin photographed his fiancée Elizabeth Rachel Day and younger brother Jack (William John) Nevin, while those in Group B were more likely taken in the early 1870s.

PLEASE OBSERVE COPYRIGHT
These photographic images and accompanying catalogue notes were sourced verbatim on 20 March 2025 from the NGV online at - https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/artist/13260/ - and posted here to this weblog without modification. We extend our appreciation to John McPhee for his generosity.

A note on the versos:
The versos of nine of these ten cdv's carry the same studio mark as the cdv above of the woman wearing a bonnet with a pink bow. It was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele, a more decorative version of an earlier design by Alfred Bock featuring a belt and buckle cartouche encircling both names now, his and his former colleague's - "T. NEVIN late A. BOCK" , the belt enclosing the firm's name -"City Photographic Establishment" and topped with a kangaroo perched below the Latin aspirational motto "Ad Altiora" loosely meaning "To higher things." Underneath, their studio address "140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town" was printed in block letters, and below that in italics "Further Copies can be obtained at any time." Thomas Nevin acquired Alfred Bock's lease on the studio, the City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth Street, Hobart Town, on Alfred Bock's insolvency in 1865 and departure to Victoria in 1867. Another design used by Nevin included the initial of his middle name - "J" for James - "T. J. Nevin" - which was printed exclusively as his government contractor stamp on the versos on prisoners' mugshots, portraits of government officials and their families, and government contractors' property such as Samuel Page's Royal Mail coach.

The verso of cdv No. 9 (see below), the upper body portrait in an oval buff mount of a senior beardless gentleman, does not bear the same stamp as the nine in this group of ten cdv's. It is blank apart from traces of the embossed imprint on the recto - "T. NEVIN PHOTO". The pencilled secondary inscription and reference in the NGV catalogue notes to the partial "chock" on the front of this cvd, when transcribed, reads:

"l.r.: NEVI(…illeg) / HO(…illeg) //" fully transcribed is "lower right, T. NEVIN PHOTO" to indicate the mark's position on the mount.

Nevin used the same blindstamp - "T. NEVIN PHOTO" on the mount of several stereographs such as this one titled "A farmer and friend surveying his sown crop" (TMAG Collection Ref: Q1994.56.2) and four taken on the "Colonists' Trip to Adventure Bay" on the 31 January 1872 (TMAG and private collections).

The following seven cdv's carry verso the same secondary pencilled inscription of a letter and/or a number combination suggesting a collector's or archivist's sequence with the same provenance, from a family album perhaps, or from a sale list at a collectables fair etc.. Note that the number "314" is written in pencil upper right on the verso of the cdv above of the woman wearing a bonnet with pink ribbons, and that her cdv by Nevin would fit into this sequence between 313 and 315, a clear indication that they were sourced as a set and were numbered accordingly, by a private collector or the public institution on acquisition.

  • "312" = upper right, 312 on the verso of 9. Upper body portrait, oval mount, of a senior gentleman, beardless
  • "u.r.: 313" = upper right, 313 on the verso of 2. A solemn couple in their thirties.
  • "u.r.: 315" = upper right 315 on the verso of 3. Professional couple, well-dressed and relaxed
  • "316" = upper right 316 on the verso of 10. Upper body portrait, oval mount, woman with amazing eyes
  • "u.r.: 317" = upper right 317 on the verso of 5. Headstand holding adolescent girl in pink scarf
  • "u.l.: 1" = upper left 1 on the verso of 7. Man with bushy side whiskers, gold fob chain and dining chair
  • "u.r.: 318" = upper right 318 on the verso of 8. Two young women standing together in white dresses and identical hairstyles.

No secondary inscriptions are noted verso for the following:
  • 1.    Young boy in suit holding hat, right arm resting on a table next to a basket of flowers.
  • 4.    Three women, two in black, one on the slipper chair with a landscape album
  • 7.    Man with bushy mutton chops, gold fob chain and dining chair

New terminology:
These NGV catalogue notes use the word "support" instead of "front" or "mount", and "support reverse" instead of "back" or "verso". The phrase "coloured dyes" refers to any colour added by hand. The word "chock" refers to Nevin's blindstamp "T. NEVIN PHOTO" on No. 9, at lower right on the mount of the upper body portrait of an elderly beardless man.


Group A: the thick carpet with large squares bordered in white
Studio decor items in addition to the thick carpet with large squares bordered in white with floral centre motif; - a small single stem occasional table with tripod base; a basket of flowers, hand-coloured; the drape to right of frame, heavily coloured; books; Nevin's hand-held stereoscopic viewer.

1. Young boy in suit holding hat, right arm resting on a table next to a basket of flowers.
Thomas J. Nevin photographed this immaculately turned out pre-teen boy in the late 1860s at the studio formerly operated by Alfred Bock, the "City Photographic Establishment, 140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town". On Bock's insolvency and relocation to Victoria in 1867, Nevin acquired the lease of the studio, the glasshouse, negative stock, equipment and studio furnishings. The occasion for this boy's photograph may well have been the visit of the Duke of Edinburgh in 1868, when Hobart photographers were invited to contribute images of Tasmanian children for an album to be presented to the royal visitor. It is unusual for this sort of portrait taken of a child in this setting in these years 1867-1868 not to carry the label of Nevin's firm operated at that time with partner Robert Smith as NEVIN & SMITH.

While the boy's familial name is unknown, untold care was taken to present him at Nevin's studio as a beautifully groomed, healthy child of a middle-class urban family. His bespoke three piece suit with a single button and satin tie to secure his jacket at the neck over a white shirt collar (all new and newly pressed), his highly polished shoes, and of course, his large hat with its flattened crown held tightly at the brim by his side - all these were the perfect accoutrements of a young man poised on the threshold of adulthood.

Assuming that the colouring of this cdv was performed by Nevin or one of his assistants and not subsequently by the purchaser's family, the colourist may have been his fiancée and future wife Elizabeth Rachel Day who was already present in his life around the same time as this boy's visit to the studio. The light colours applied to the boy's cheeks and darker colours applied to the flowers appear on her own portraits and on portraits of children photographed by Nevin in the late 1860s. By contrast, the magenta painted onto the drape to right of frame was applied with a heavy hand; it is arguably the most vibrant colour yet to appear in all of Nevin's full-length portraits featuring the same drape in varying shades of red.

The same single stem table with a tripod base and thick carpet with large squares outlined in white with a central floral motif both appear in the cdv (above) of the woman wearing a bonnet with a pink bow (NGV accession no.2003.395). The same carpet and table appear below in the cdv of a solemn couple (No. 2); the same carpet appears as well in the cdv of a professional couple (No. 3).



The cdv image: Young boy in suit holding hat, right arm resting on a table next to a basket of flowers.
The cdv verso: "T. Nevin late A. Bock" was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Boy), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142919/

Medium albumen silver photograph, coloured dyes
Measurements 9.4 × 5.9 cm (image and sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Accession Number 2020.374
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



2. A solemn couple in their thirties.
The heavily bearded man standing to the seated woman's left appeared hatless, his hair barely combed down, when he stepped into Thomas Nevin's set-up for the photograph. The man had buttoned his comfortable jacket at the neck and worn a vest underneath without a shirt collar. His occupation might have been anything from teaching school to cooking, nothing too hard on his hands. Whatever was bulging in his jacket pocket was probably a tool of trade, even a set of eye glasses.

The woman, perhaps only recently married, wore the plainest of outfits, with minimal decoration on her dark blouson apart from the wide white cuffs and spotted necktie. She had parted her hair at the centre, tied it backwards but kept her ears covered and held it all in place with ribbons. These two made a solemn pair as they faced the photographer; their serious expressions either occasioned by the very act of posing for their photograph or some other event in their lives. Smiling was generally not encouraged in this era, but some sitters did appear to smile naturally. Again, in this photograph, as was his custom given the camera technology he was using, Nevin's focus was sharpest at the middle of the frame, in this case on the woman's face which appears sharper than the man's face higher in the frame with his pale eyes, or the blurred carpet at lower frame.

Two books in this setting imply literacy, even religiosity. Posed sitting while facing the photographer, the woman pointed the index finger of her right hand to a passage in a book held open on her lap, which could have been the Bible. Or was the pose of the sitter resting a hand on an open book one of Nevin's strategies to keep his sitter still with something to hold while waiting for the image's exposure? The young girl with pink scarf in the cdv below (No. 5) also points an index finger to a place on a page in an open book, likewise the woman seated on Nevin's slipper chair who points to a photo in the album on her lap (No. 4, cdv of three women). Much as actors striking a pose in a tableau, these sitters were given the props of an educated class and asked to perform accordingly, whether literate in fact or not.

Another book sits unopened on the same table next to Thomas Nevin's hand-held stereoscopic viewer. It is the same viewer he held wearing white gloves when he was photographed sitting next to the same table ca. late 1860s but it was not the same carpet then. The carpet here was the carpet in his studio when he photographed his fiancée Elizabeth Rachel Day, and in another sitting, when he photographed his younger brother Jack (later Constable John) Nevin leaning on a plinth ca. 1868 while operating as the firm Nevin & Smith. The same single stem table with tripod base, the same thick carpet with large squares outlined in white with a central motif, and the drape - these feature in the earlier portraits by Nevin taken in the late 1860s and most were not hand-coloured. A notable exception is No. 1 above, the cdv of a well-groomed boy.



The cdv image: A solemn couple in their thirties.
The cdv verso: "T. Nevin late A. Bock" was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Woman and man), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142910/

Medium albumen silver photograph
Measurements 9.3 × 5.9 cm (image and sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Inscription secondary inscription: inscribed in pencil on support reverse u.r.: 313
Accession Number 2020.365
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



3. Professional couple, well-dressed and relaxed
Again, here Nevin has drawn sharpest focus to the middle of the frame, to the sitter, in this case as in others, onto the woman's face. But this woman's face is exceptional: she appears good-humoured, relaxed, and intellectually engaged with the photographer as few other women have appeared in this era at Nevin's studio. Her amazingly clear eyes would have suggested excellent health, even beauty to a captivated Nevin as he talked them through the sitting. Because her lips are slightly apart, teeth visible, he might have captured her conversing during the exposure.

The man had trimmed his chinstrap beard for the occasion, put on a dark suit with a light-coloured vest and shirt collar, and placed a clean handkerchief in his jacket pocket. His occupation? Possibly a professional such as a medical practitioner, his wife a nurse. Her striped dress with rolled shoulder pads appears to be gathered at the waist with a belt secured with a sterling silver nurse's buckle. The benign demeanour of this couple suggests they were educated yet unpretentious and well-regarded in their community. Both appear to be in their mid to late thirties at a guess, though signs of age and life expectancy as lived during their era cannot be judged by signs of age as lived in ours.

This is another portrait left untouched by the application of colours to the sitter's features or clothing, or by heavy-handed colouring of the carpet and drape, perhaps at the clients request.



The cdv image: Professional couple, well-dressed and relaxed
The cdv verso: "T. Nevin late A. Bock" was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Woman and man), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142913/

Medium albumen silver photograph
Measurements 9.2 × 5.9 cm (image and sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Inscription secondary inscription: inscribed in pencil on support reverse u.r.: 315
Accession Number 2020.368
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display


The couple are yet to be identified but they may be known to descendants or researchers from photos taken of them at other studios. They liked being photographed. The fact that this woman wore a different dress for her upper body portrait cdv (below - and see Group C, No. 10 below), and appears a little older than in the full-length portrait taken with her husband, might suggest she returned to Thomas Nevin's studio for a second portrait a few years later, ca. 1872, by which time Nevin's business was flourishing. His cameras and lenses were new, his studio furnishings more modern, more elaborate, his government contracts and Lodge membership settled, and his commissions with the legal fraternity ongoing. He was also married by July 1871 to his long-term fiancée Elizabeth Rachel Day, and by May 1872 he was a first time father living with his little family next door to his studio at 138-140 Elizabeth Street, Hobart.

This fine upper body capture, taken quite close at short focal range and very sharply focussed, shows this young woman's amazing eyes even brighter, the shape of her ears even clearer, her facial bone structure more pronounced, and her smile more knowingly wry. If her earlier portrait by Nevin taken with her husband was not quite as sharp, this portrait was perfect in its execution. So who was she?



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Woman), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart" [ see No. 10 below]
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142911/


Group B: thin floor-covering (tapis) with lozenge pattern
Studio decor items in addition to the floor-covering (tapis) with lozenge and chain link pattern, hand-coloured: - the slipper chair; the faux Georgian window; the drape; a large photo album; the photographer's head stand; the damask drape with floral points; the backsheet of a tiled Italianate balcony and balustrade overlooking a wide cart path beside a stream meandering to low mountains at the horizon; the big box tabletop revolving stereoscopic viewer; the table with the griffin-shaped legs; green colouring; orange colouring; dining chair with carved crest rail and cabriole legs.

4. Three women, two in black, one on the slipper chair with a photo album
Taken ca. 1872, the carpet in this full-length portrait of three unidentified women was carefully painted over in two tones: the lozenge pattern and chain links were picked out in brown, and the criss-cross borders lightened in orange. Visible at extreme left of frame is the edge of the fake free-standing column seen in a few other cdv's by Nevin dating from the early 1870s. It was meant to suggest a floor-to-ceiling Georgian window framed by an arched wooden jamb behind which a large backsheet was hung, painted with an Italianate balcony and distant vista of river and trees.

Were those two seated women wearing black dresses to signify they were in mourning or were their dresses just another dark colour? One sits on Nevin's shiny lady's slipper chair holding open a photo album, the other is perched on a stool beside her. The third stands behind them in a light coloured dress, leaning into the back of the chair. The woman holding the album wears a netted half glove on her left hand, her index finger pointing to a place on the page. This is the third cdv in this set of ten in which the sitter points an index finger onto a page in an open book. It must have been Nevin's preferred pose to keep his subjects still while timing the exposure.

These three women's hairstyles, much fussed over with curling irons, met current standards of fashion. The woman standing behind the chair made two large flat cowpats on either side of her centre part, and long ringlets to fall over each shoulder. The woman sitting with the album on her lap wove ribbons into her twists to have them falling over her left shoulder, her bow at the back holding the other half clutch of hair up off her nape. The third woman perched on a stool next to the chair rolled her hair up from the back onto her crown into a horizontal sausage, pinned the roll evenly in place, and parted her fringe centre at the front across her forehead. Each woman exposed her ears to show they were up with the most recent of modern trends, in contrast to the old-fashioned style of hair covering the ears worn by the solemn woman in No. 2 above.

At the studio Thomas Nevin would pass the dry print to his wife Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin to apply a light pink or rose colour to each woman's cheeks and lips, using the same colouring she had applied to several of her own portraits, and to portraits taken by Nevin of children in these years ca. 1872-1875.



The cdv image: Three women, two in black, one on the slipper chair with a photo album
The cdv verso: "T. Nevin late A. Bock" was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Three women, with book), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142918/

Medium albumen silver photograph, coloured dyes
Measurements 9.6 × 5.9 cm (image and sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Accession Number 2020.373
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



5. Headstand holding adolescent girl in pink scarf
The base of Thomas Nevin's head stand is visible behind this girl's oversized, worn-out boots. A bit of the clamp holding her right arm at the elbow is also visible. The clamp gripping her head was so tight, the pain she had to endure standing motionless for a minute or more without crying or breathing normally made her eyes burn. She glowered at Nevin while heeding his instructions to keep her left hand steady, index finger pressed to the page on the book open on the table where a few flowers and feathers were gathered (on her hat, perhaps).

The poverty of this child in early adolescence is apparent in every aspect, from her plain rough cloth dress and jacket, dirty and stained, and her one ornament, a scarf made from a scrap of thin fabric, knotted at the ends which Nevin's assistant had coloured to brighten an otherwise unhappy face. This portrait could well attest to the misery of child labour as known in Victorian times. She might have been the drudge for her own large and impoverished family, or a house servant to a family such as the Chandlers who could afford to pay for her visit to the photographer's. The Chandler's photograph taken by Thomas Nevin of a beautifully groomed young George Chandler (b. 1860) in 1871 features the same studio decor : -

1. the carpet or tapis with lozenge and chain link pattern
2. the table with the griffin-shaped legs
3. flowers on the table
4. the damask drape with floral pattern at left of frame
5. the backsheet of a tiled Italianate balcony and balustrade overlooking a wide cart path beside a stream meandering to low mountains at the horizon.

These same five studio furnishings appear in a dozen or more extant cdv's taken by Thomas J. Nevin in the late 1860s to mid 1870s, including the cdv below, the heavily coloured and much faded photograph of a woman posed with Nevin's big box stereoscope viewer (No. 6), and the other cdv below of two young women in white dresses with identical hair-styles (No. 8). The backsheet of a tiled Italianate balcony appears in the cdv below of a man with bushy side whiskers, a gold Albert at his waist, and hand resting on a dining chair (No. 7). It also appears in a similar set-up Nevin used to photograph Alfred Barrett Biggs ca. 1872 and in another, a cdv of a young Mary Morrison.




The cdv image: Headstand holding adolescent girl in pink scarf
The cdv verso: "T. Nevin late A. Bock" was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Girl), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142917/

Medium albumen silver photograph, coloured dyes
Measurements 9.5 × 5.9 cm (image and sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Inscription secondary inscription: inscribed in pencil on support reverse u.r.: 317
Accession Number 2020.372
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



6. Heavily hand-coloured cdv of  woman standing next to Nevin's tabletop stereo viewer
This photograph was tumbled through that big box tabletop revolving stereoscopic viewer hundreds and hundreds of times. This version has been reprinted - not from the original negative of course - but from an earlier print of the same cdv - once, twice or maybe several times over. It is a smudged, faded, and degraded copy in very poor condition which some colour-crazed owner had all but destroyed yet retained as a family photograph.

Even before the sepia dried on this print, the wet hand-colouring was applied so indecorously that the woman's over-coloured face became disfigured, unrecognizably so, while the flowers, daubed in an unnatural green, floated off into the air showing no connection to the vase. Once again, the drape in this cdv as in a dozen or more of these Nevin cdv's, received a punishingly thick coat of magenta. The woman's dress and the box stereoscopic viewer, oddly enough were left untouched.

Bizarrely, the carpet's natural pattern, its warp and weft of criss-crossing borders left to right containing lozenges and chain-links has been contradicted entirely with thick green lines running vertically up the centre from the bottom edge of the mount onto the bottom hem of the woman's dress. These coloured vertical lines were believed to deepen or extend depth of field, give longer perspective and being green, thought to invoke grass in nature. An abominable mess, or an artistic creation? Regardless, it documents a time when natural coloured photography was still decades in the making.

Thomas J. Nevin had his own "selfie" taken standing next to this much-prized tabletop revolving stereo viewer. He posed several of his clients standing next to it, both men and women, either placed at left of frame, or in one instance of a woman similar to this pose placed at right of frame. Most received colouring on the drape, light colours on some facial feature, on flowers if present, and on items of clothing.



The cdv image: Heavily hand-coloured cdv of woman standing next to Nevin's tabletop stereo viewer
The cdv verso: Numbered 176 in top left corner. Very stained. Stamped "T. Nevin late A. Bock" - Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Woman with arm resting on a table-top stereograph viewer), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142916/

Medium albumen silver photograph, coloured dyes
Measurements 9.1 × 6.0 cm (image and sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Accession Number 2020.371
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



7. Man with bushy mutton chops, gold fob chain and dining chair
Everything about this client's dress and demeanour, and everything about the furnished items in this studio-set up begs comparison with Thomas Nevin's full-length portrait of Alfred Barrett Biggs. This man may well have been Alfred's brother Abraham Edwin Biggs, owner and lessor of the residence and studio which Thomas Nevin had leased and operated as the City Photographic Establishment, 138-140 Elizabeth St. Hobart Town since former leasee Alfred Bock's departure to Victoria in 1867. Alfred and Abraham had another brother, Isaac Henry Biggs, sons of Abraham and Eliza (Coleman) Biggs. Each brother married their respective brides all on the same day, February 22nd, 1855 in a triple wedding held at the Wesleyan Centenary Chapel, Melville-street, Hobart.

Alfred Barrett Biggs (1825–1900)
Abraham Edwin Biggs (1829-1899)
Isaac Henry Biggs (1831-1906)

The Hobart Valuation Rolls for 1872 listed Thomas Nevin as the occupier of Abraham Biggs' property, and Victoria as Abraham Biggs' place of residence, so if this man was indeed Abraham Biggs, Nevin took the opportunity to photograph him when he came to renew Nevin's lease on the studio, ca. early 1872.

Older brother Alfred Biggs may have accompanied him that day, so that each brother could be photographed in the same session, though that seems unlikely, given seasonal differences in each man's clothing, differences in where and how Nevin placed the chair to strike each man's pose and lastly, differences of light and shade in the final printing. While Alfred wore a summer suit for his portrait, this man wore a winter three piece; while Alfred held a walking stick or riding crop in one hand and steadied his left hand on the carved crest rail of the dining chair placed right of frame, this man rested his right hand on the same chair placed left of frame.

Otherwise, similarities abound between all other aspects in this portrait and quite a few other full-length portraits taken by Nevin from ca. 1871. The thin floor-covering with a lozenge and chain link pattern is everywhere in portraits right up to 1875; it even features in his wedding photo taken in July 1871 with his bride Elizabeth Rachel Day. The drape, however, which appears here and in many other of his cdv's has luckily escaped a brutal lashing of crimson or magenta paint. Turned back at the hem here it reveals the massive painted backsheet featuring a tiled Italianate balcony and balustrade overlooking a wide cart path beside a stream meandering to low mountains at the horizon. The one similar aspect of this man's dress with that of Alfred Biggs' is the touch of yellow applied to each man's gold fob chain (called an Albert) by Nevin's studio colorist who more likely than not was his wife Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin.

More could be said of this man's facial hair - his bushy "mutton-chops" or "burnsides," - which men of the 1870s thought represented elemental masculinity, apart from providing health benefits such as protection from sunburn and a means to keep warm in winter. Thomas Nevin wore the exact same style as his client standing before him for this portrait - whispy sideburns, a pencil-thin moustache, and a clean-shaven chin -when he was photographed with his bride Elizabeth Rachel on their wedding day in July 1871. Both men as they faced each other in Nevin's studio on this day in 1871 would have ranked themselves among the fashionable men to be seen on Elizabeth St. Hobart Town.



The cdv image: Man with bushy mutton chops, gold fob chain and dining chair.
The cdv verso: "T. Nevin late A. Bock" was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Man), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142915/

Medium albumen silver photograph, gold leaf
Measurements 9.6 × 5.9 cm (image and sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Inscription secondary inscription: inscribed in pencil on support reverse u.l.: 1
Accession Number 2020.370
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



8. Two young women standing together in white dresses and identical hairstyles
What is it with these index fingers pointing either to a place on a page in an open book (see No's. 5, 4 and 2 above) or here, pointing to the floor? What exactly were Nevin's instructions and explanation as to the purpose of pointing when he asked these two young women wearing white dresses and identical hairstyles to ready themselves for the capture? Where had they been or where were they going in those dresses, and why was the older woman on the right scowling at Nevin? What had he said or done to upset or even offend her?

In the three examples above, the sitter's hand pointing the finger was rested on a book which was held steady by the other hand, thereby minimising movement while they waited a minute or so for the image's exposure. But here, these two young women are standing with only each other to hold them steady. Pointing their index fingers - on the left hand of the one on the right, on the right hand of the one on the left - to the floor might appear to serve no purpose unless it was a clever means of calming nerves, of minimising mindless fidgeting causing movement and blurring. As a single unit this pair were still likely to wobble and lose balance not just because of differences in height, but because one head rest appears to be holding the young one on the left but not the older one on the right. The base of the head rest is just barely visible in the space between her dress and the carpet. And then there was the banter coming from Nevin, confusing them, offending them perhaps, upsetting them to the point where the older one could not stop scowling for the duration of the exposure.

These two women may have been aunt and niece, sisters or friends rather than mother and daughter. The younger one on the left appears to be in her late teens, while the older one of the right appears to be in her twenties. What did Nevin do or say that so upset them? Did he curse or let slip some colourful language? Did he spin a limerick to amuse them? Did he joke about Catholics and Protestants because these two looked as if they were headed home from Communion rather than on their way out to a wedding or party, and as a Wesleyan he had plenty to say about religion. Perhaps he was tipsy, smelt of alcohol, and tried a bit of flirting. Whatever went down that day in 1871, the portrait he produced from the session with these two turned out just fine. It's a great portrait, clean apart from the fingerprint across their bodices, with sharp focus on the eyes, and just some light blue hand- colouring on their belts. Even details in the vista on the backsheet were in focus. Only the tear in the mount, lower left, has detracted from the value of this cdv in its 160 years since leaving Nevin's studio.



The cdv image: Two young women standing together in white dresses and identical hairstyles
The cdv verso: "T. Nevin late A. Bock" was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Two women), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142914/

Medium albumen silver photograph
Measurements 9.6 × 5.9 cm (image and sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Inscription secondary inscription: inscribed in pencil on support reverse u.r.: 318
Accession Number 2020.369
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



Group C: upper body full-frontal portraits, cdv's on oval mount

9. Upper body portrait, oval mount, of a senior gentleman, beardless
This is a rare example of Thomas Nevin's blindstamp on the oval mount of a cdv portrait. The full impress should read - "T. NEVIN PHOTO." There are some examples where Nevin has hand-written his name this way in sepia on the versos of a few stereographs, prior to providing a client with a print.

The only other examples carrying this particular embossed mark are stereographs. On one held at the TMAG (Ref: Q1994.56.22) which we have titled "A Farmer and his field", Nevin imprinted the mark "T. NEVIN PHOTO" on the right side of the yellow mount. On four others, one was imprinted with the mark at bottom centre of a stereograph in a buff oval mount. Those four were taken on the Colonists' Trip to Adventure Bay (Bruny Island), 31st January 1872. Nevin was commissioned by the organiser, John Woodcock Graves the younger, to photograph VIP's among the excursionists. His group photographs included John Woodcock Graves jnr, solicitor; his daughter Jean Porthouse Graves; R. Byron Miller, barrister; Sir John O'Shanassy, former Premier of Victoria; Lukin Boyes, son of auditor and artist G. T. W. Boyes; and James Erskine Calder, former Surveyor-General, Tasmania. This stereograph too is held at the TMAG (Ref: Q1994.56.5).

Perhaps this septuagenerian was among the passengers on board The City of Hobart on that day-trip, Wednesday, 31 January 1872, though not identifiably one of the VIP's listed above. He does look familiar: because of his clean-shaven chin and full three piece suit with collar and tie, he may well have been a government official or member of the legal fraternity.

There are six extant stereographs of the day-trippers photographed in groups taken by Thomas Nevin that day; four (4) were imprinted with the mark "T. NEVIN PHOTO" so this cdv of an elderly gentleman taken by Nevin, most likely in a studio setting, can be dated quite accurately to sometime in January 1872 or thereabouts, during a period when Nevin favoured that blindstamp or mark imprinted on the mount, as distinct from verso labels and stamps.



The cdv image: Upper body portrait, oval mount, of a senior gentleman, beardless
The cdv verso: Numbered "312" otherwise blank apart from trace of embossed mark on recto (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Man), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142912/

Medium albumen silver photograph
Measurements 7.2 × 5.7 cm (image) (oval) 9.6 × 5.8 cm (sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Inscription chock mark on sheet l.r.: NEVI(…illeg) / HO(…illeg) //
Accession Number 2020.367
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



10. Upper body portrait, oval mount, woman with amazing eyes
This is the same attractive woman with amazing eyes photographed by Nevin with her husband as a full-length portrait - see notes for cdv No. 3, Group A, above.



The cdv image: Upper body portrait, oval mount, woman with amazing eyes
The cdv verso: "T. Nevin late A. Bock" was Thomas Nevin's most frequently used commercial studio mark for private clientele featuring a belt and buckle cartouche (see A Note on the Versos above).



NGV Catalogue notes:
"No title (Woman), carte-de-visite
(1867-1875)
T. NEVIN, Hobart"
Link: https://www.ngv.vic.gov.au/explore/collection/work/142911/

Medium albumen silver photograph
Measurements 5.5 × 4.1 cm (image) (oval) 9.6 × 5.4 cm (sheet)
Place/s of Execution Hobart, Tasmania
Accession Number 2020.366
Department Australian Photography
Credit Line National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
Gift of John McPhee through the Australian Government's Cultural Gifts Program, 2020
Gallery location Not on display



RELATED POSTS main weblog

Charged under the CRIMES ACT: brothers Bill, George and Tom NEVIN, 1909-1911

Brothers George, Tom and Bill NEVIN, sons of Thomas and Elizabeth Rachel (Day) NEVIN
Former A-G, G. Crosby GILMORE, Counsel for Tom Nevin 1911
Interpretation of the CRIMES ACT 1900: "incite" and "resist"

Wm John Nevin 1900

Subject: William John Nevin (1878-1927)
Photographer: unknown, possibly his father Thomas J. Nevin
Location and Date: Hobart, Tasmania, ca. 1897
Provenance: by descent, Thomas J. Nevin and family.
Copyright © KLW NFC Group & KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection

This is one of the saddest stories to emerge from publicly available records relating to the adult lives of the six surviving children born to parents, photographer and civil servant Thomas James Nevin snr (1842-1923) and Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin (1847-1914) at Hobart, Tasmania, between 1872 and 1888.

It involves three of their four adult sons - George Ernest Nevin (known as Georgie) and Thomas J. Nevin jnr (known as Tom) who were arrested on identical charges on two separate occasions of inciting their brother William John Nevin (known as Bill) to resist arrest: the first on 29 June 1909 with George Nevin; and again on May 6, 1911 with Tom Nevin in another incident, this time involving assault by police of both brothers Bill and Tom Nevin. Where Constable Flude had succeeded in penalties for the charge in 1909 against George Nevin during the arrest of his brother Bill Nevin, he was sure he would succeed with the same charge in 1911 against Tom Nevin during another arrest of Bill Nevin but he failed, because this time the former Attorney-General G. Crosby Gilmore stepped in.

Police harassment of their father
This family first became associated with the police and judiciary when their father Thomas J. Nevin snr was contracted on colonial warrant as photographer servicing the courts and legal fraternity from the date of his marriage to Elizabeth Rachel Day at Kangaroo Valley, Hobart, Tasmania in 1871.

The incident which resulted in their son Bill Nevin's arrest on 26th June 1909, and the charge of incitement to resist arrest against his brother Georgie Nevin took place at the Ship Hotel, Collins Street, Hobart, but the incident which resulted in Bill Nevin's arrest on the same charge on May 5th, 1911 and the same related charges brought against his other brother Tom Nevin in June 1911, took place outside their parents' family residence, 82 Warwick Street, Hobart.

The property at Warwick Street was regularly surveilled by constables in the years after their father Thomas J. Nevin's dismissal by the Hobart City Council from the position (and residency) in December 1880 of Hobart Town Hall Keeper for drunkenness while on duty. In addition to full-time civil service as the Hall Keeper, Nevin's fourteen (14) years of government contractual work (1872 to 1886), which required the production of prisoner mugshots for the Municipal Police Office in Hobart's courts and prisons, among other duties as Special Constable during the Chiniquy riots of 1879, ensured his much too much familiarity with police brutality and judicial indifference, as police knew only too well. From 1878, when he was assigned Office Keeper for the HCC at the Town Hall to his dismissal in December 1880, he was privy to council and mayoral committee decisions affecting just about everyone in the greater Hobart region. He was also assigned assistant bailiff duties to senior detectives in the mid 1880s, a job guaranteed to raise hostility from those affected by house evictions etc etc.

Another source of information about police readily came from Thomas J. Nevin's younger brother, Constable John Nevin (William John Nevin, 1852-1891), known as Jack to the family. He had joined the civil service, aged 18 yrs in 1870, and was stationed at the Asylum, Cascades Prison for Males, Hobart by 1875. His service continued at the Hobart Gaol, Campbell Street, as "Gaol Messenger", a rank which covered his duties as photographer's assistant to his brother, and as a hospital "Wardsman" until his untimely death from typhoid while still in service, aged 39 yrs old. His nephew Bill or Will (the subject of these arrests in 1909 and 1911) was given the exact same name at birth as his father's brother (William John Nevin), just as his brother Tom Nevin was given the exact same name as their father at birth (Thomas James Nevin).

Thomas J. Nevin snr was constantly harassed by constables, some of whom he recognised as ex-prisoners recruited to the police force in times of social unrest. Others held him responsible for their demotion in the ranks when he reported them for being drunk on security duty for the Town Hall during his time as Keeper. They regularly sought him out in Hobart's streets while meeting with friends, even hanging around outside his house, to lay charges for "obscene language" or school truancy of his children, or even singing ditties offensive to police within the confines of his own house, until he finally complained to the court he was being targeted as a "stereotype" . Tasmanian law allowed for charges to be brought, because even though Nevin was not on public property, he could still be heard by passers-by. He was inside the yard "abutting on Warwick Street" when using "very filthy language" according to the constables who seemed to appear out of nowhere at just the right moment.

TRANSCRIPT
CITY POLICE COURT. - The Police Magistrate (Mr. B. Shaw) and Mr. James Harcourt, J.P., adjudicated yesterday.
Thomas Nevin, labourer, was charged with having used obscene language in a house in Warwick street on the 9th inst.. He pleaded not guilty, but Constables Crane and Clark proved the offence. Defendant remarked that he was always brought up on the same charge. He thought he must be "stereotyped" with the offence. The Police Magistrate : I am afraid you are ; you have been convicted 33 times of the same charge. We order you to pay a fine of £5, in default you will be imprisoned for three months.

Source: THE MERCURY. (1898, September 21). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 2.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article9431088

When fined 50/s- on Thursday, 14th March 1895 for obscene language which could be heard from the street, the Magistrate also applied for a notice to be issued to publicans prohibiting them from supplying liquor to Thomas Nevin, "operatic for twelve months". He also advised Thomas Nevin to seek medical attention.  The prohibition was impossible to enforce, however. With George Adams' Tasmanian Brewery located across the road on the corner of Elizabeth and Warwick Streets, just metres from the Nevin residence at 82 Warwick Street and in full view from their front door, both Thomas Nevin and son Bill would be tempted with easy access to alcohol the moment they left the house.

As for stereotypes, what were the common targets of social prejudice and opprobium in the 1890s, the decade which saw the rise of the Temperance movement? Was Thomas Nevin snr cast as the hot-tempered red-head, the drunken Irishman, garrulous to the point of madness with "no control over his unbridled tongue" as one Police Magistrate put it (Mercury 26 May 1897)? Or was he less than the masculine ideal - a soft and sensitive" artist-photographer" who hand-coloured his photographs of convicts - .i.e. prisoners? He had found himself the butt of that insult in the meeting of the Police Committee which sacked him from the Hobart Town Hall keeper position in December 1880. Then again, he might have cursed long and too loud the imperialist war-mongers wanting to send his sons off to fight the Boers. Neither Thomas J. Nevin snr nor any of his children volunteered service in the Imperial Forces at the Boer War (1899-1902) or at the First World War (1914-18). Pater familias and Wesleyan John Nevin snr had not brought his family across the world from Ireland to settle in Tasmania to see them sent off to fight another war. His nightmarish experiences fighting the French in waist-deep snow at the Canadian Rebellions in 1839-40 were set as example enough that none of his family should ever go to war again.

Warwick St Hobart 1890

Warwick and Elizabeth Streets, Hobart, Tasmania.
Thomas J. Nevin snr and family resided in this neighbourhood 1880s-1923
Detail of a view of Hobart, Domain and eastern shore taken from West Hobart
Pretyman Family (NG1012) 17 Aug 1892
Archives Office of Tasmania
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/Archives/NS1013-1-729

William John NEVIN, known as Bill or Will Nevin, the second son to survive to adulthood of photographer Thomas James Nevin and Elizabeth (Day) Nevin, was born at the Hobart Town Hall, Macquarie St. where his family resided during his father's incumbency as Town Hall Keeper. He was registered by his father at birth as William John Nevin on 14 March 1878 (see BMD records in Addenda below). The press reports of 6 May, 1911, however, stated he was arrested and booked as William James Nevin by police on two charges. It appears to be an error made twice by the same or different reporters at the Tasmanian News (May 6, 1911) and the Daily Post (August 19, 1911), although he may have changed his middle name "John" to "James" to avoid confusion with his uncle, his father's brother, Constable John Nevin (William John Nevin, 1852-1891). He was certainly not identical with another Tasmanian, unrelated to the Nevin family of Hobart called William John Nevin, born 16 October 1866, at Longford in the north of the island, son of farmer James Nevin and Mary (Hemphill) Nevin.

The Crimes Act 1900
Section 60 of the Crimes Act 1900 was used by police to bring the charge of incitement to resist arrest against brothers George Nevin in 1909 and Tom Nevin in June 1911. They were charged with having incited their brother Bill Nevin to resist Constable Flude in the execution of his duty on two separate occasions and two years apart, involving the same charge and the same constable. So while their brother Bill Nevin was the cause on each occasion of these charges filed against his two brothers during his arrest by police - and for each incident he was fined just a small amount -  it was George and Tom Nevin who were the real targets of a zealous Constable Flude's pursuit of this family, using the same charge of incitement under Section 60. In addition, a charge under Section 32 of the Crimes Act was used by police to accuse Tom Nevin in 1911 of aggravated assault of police. Prior to 1900, charges of obscene language brought against their father Thomas J. Nevin were applied under Amendment 1888 to the Police Act 1865.

"INCITE" and "RESIST"
Source: Crimes Act 1900
https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/download.cgi/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082
https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/download.cgi/cgi-bin/download.cgi/download/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082.txt



TRANSCRIPT

CRIMES ACT 1900
- SECT 60 Assault and other actions against police officers

60 Assault and other actions against police officers

(1AA) A person who hinders or resists, or incites another person to hinder or resist, a police officer in the execution of the officer's duty commits an offence.
Maximum penalty-- Imprisonment for 12 months or a fine of 20 penalty units or both.
(1) A person who assaults, throws a missile at, stalks, harasses or intimidates a police officer while in the execution of the officer's duty, although no actual bodily harm is occasioned to the officer, is liable to imprisonment for 5 years

(1A) A person who, during a public disorder, assaults, throws a missile at, stalks, harasses or intimidates a police officer while in the execution of the officer's duty, although no actual bodily harm is occasioned to the officer, is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.

(2) A person who assaults a police officer while in the execution of the officer's duty, and by the assault occasions actual bodily harm, is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.

(2A) A person who, during a public disorder, assaults a police officer while in the execution of the officer's duty, and by the assault occasions actual bodily harm, is liable to imprisonment for 9 years.

(3) A person who by any means--

(a)wounds or causes grievous bodily harm to a police officer while in the execution of the officer's duty, and

(b) is reckless as to causing actual bodily harm to that officer or any other person, is liable to imprisonment for 12 years.

(3A) A person who by any means during a public disorder--

(a) wounds or causes grievous bodily harm to a police officer while in the execution of the officer's duty, and

(b) is reckless as to causing actual bodily harm to that officer or any other person, is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.

(4) For the purposes of this section, an action is taken to be carried out in relation to a police officer while in the execution of the officer's duty, even though the police officer is not on duty at the time, if it is carried out--

(a) as a consequence of, or in retaliation for, actions undertaken by that police officer in the execution of the officer's duty, or

(b) because the officer is a police officer.

Source: https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/download.cgi/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082

The Case against George Nevin, 1909
Bill's younger brother George Ernest NEVIN (1880-1957) was the fifth child and fourth son born to photographer Thomas J. Nevin and Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin. He was the second surviving son born at the Hobart Town Hall during his father's residency as Town Hall keeper. In adulthood, George Nevin kept vegetable gardens for profit at his Penna estate near Richmond, Tasmania, and shared a carrier business with his older brothers Bill and Tom Nevin. He also kept an extensive collection of family memorabilia, including photographs taken by his father in the 1870s, and records of his younger brother Albert's pacers at the race track. Known as Georgie to his nieces and nephews, he lived with his older sister May Nevin in the big house at 23 Newdegate Street from the time of their father's death in 1923; neither was known to have married.

On 26 June 1909 at the Ship Hotel, Collins Street, Hobart, George Nevin intervened in the arrest of his brother Bill Nevin, who was charged with being drunk and disorderly. He was accused of inciting Bill to resist arrest, of jostling the arresting constables and calling on the crowd to protest. Bill Nevin pleaded guilty, George Nevin pleaded not guilty. Both were found guilty and ordered to pay a fine of 10/- or 7 days' imprisonment.

William and George Nevin, arrests 1909

TRANSCRIPT

CITY POLICE COURT.
MONDAY, JUNE 28. Before Aldermen H. T. Gould and D. Freeman, J's.P.
William Nevin pleaded guilty to a charge of having been drunk and disorderly in Collins street on June 20, and was ordered to pay a fine of 10/ or go to gaol for 7 days.

Inciting to Resist.
George Nevin pleaded not guilty to a charge of inciting one William Nevin a prisoner under arrest, to resist the police in the lawful execution of their duty. Constables Goss and Flude gave evidence to the effect that they had arrested William Nevin on a charge of being drunk and disorderly, and that the defendant tried to pull the prisoner away from them, his action causing the prisoner to resist violently. The defendant also jostled the arresting constables, and attempted to turn the crowd on to them. The Bench found the defendant guilty, and pointed out the seriousness of the offence to him. They ordered him to pay a fine of 10/. with 7 days' imprisonment as an alternative.

Source: CITY POLICE COURT. (1909, June 29). Daily Post (Hobart, Tas. : 1908 - 1918), p. 3.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article187875890



Above: Rabiteers, with George Nevin, extreme right, ca 1890
The verso is signed "George Nevn" [sic].
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection 2009 ARR.

The Case against Tom Nevin, 1911
Bill's elder brother Thomas James NEVIN (1874-1948) jnr, known as Tom (and Sonny to family), son of photographer Thomas James Nevin and Elizabeth (Day) Nevin, was born at his father's photographic studio, 140 Elizabeth St., Hobart Town, the second child born after elder sister Mary Florence Elizabeth (aka May) Nevin in 1872. He was given the same name as his father but did not follow his father's profession of photographer. Tom established a boot-making business at 236 Elizabeth Street, Hobart, in the early 1900s, near the corner of Warwick Street where his parents and five of his siblings - May (born 1872), Bill (born 1878), George (born 1880), Minnie (born 1884) and Albert (born 1888) - had taken up residence at No. 82 Warwick St., opposite the Domeny coach stables at 69-75 Warwick St.

Tom Nevin married Gertrude Jane Tennyson Bates, daughter of bandmaster Walter Tennyson Bates on 6 Feb. 1907 at the Methodist Parsonage, Melville St. and settled into family life in Lochner Street, West Hobart, where Gertrude gave birth to a son Walter in 1909. The child survived just one year. He died of bronchial pneumonia and was buried - on 16th August 1911 - just three days before Tom was called into court to face the magistrate's decision - on 19th August 1911 - for the charge against him of inciting his brother Bill to resist arrest.

Without doubt, Tom Nevin's emotional suffering that week was immeasurable. He was facing imprisonment for an unfounded and unproven charge. Costs incurred at trial over months by his legal counsel, the well-heeled former Attorney-General G. Crosby Gilmore, had placed considerable financial distress on his wife, and with the sudden death of their baby son Walter just days before the court's decision, they would have questioned whether Bill Nevin, the brother whose scuffles with police had led to their reduced circumstances, was ever going to be safe.



Subject: Tom or "Sonny" Nevin (T. J. Nevin jnr)
Location and date: Peacock's Jam Factory, Salamanca Place, Hobart, 1905
Photographer: unknown
Provenance: Nevin family by descent
Copyright © KLW NFC Group Private Collection


Tom Nevin was defending the charge of inciting his brother Bill Nevin to resist arrest on the evening of 5th May, 1911 outside the Nevin family residence at 82 Warwick Street, Hobart when the police additionally accused him of assaulting them under Section 32 of the Crimes Act 1900. On August 19th, 1911, the Police Magistrate finally gave his reserved decision and dismissed the case.



Source: https://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/download.cgi/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/ca190082

Press reports May to August 1911
In each case leading to the arrests of all three Nevin brothers in 1909 and 1911, Constable Flude consistently lied about the sequence of events and rough handling by police. In the first of these press reports during the case against Tom Nevin in 1911, Constable Flude grossly exaggerated his account of the arrest of Bill Nevin with accusations that he "acted like a madman" and needed "four policemen" to take him to the police station.

1. CITY POLICE COURT (1911, May 6). Tasmanian News (Hobart, Tas), p. 2.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article187120196

TRANSCRIPT

CITY POLICE COURT
At the City Police Court to-day, before Mr. W. O. Wise, P.M. Inspector Weston prosecuting. William James [sic, John not James] Nevin was charged with having been drunk and disorderly in Elizabeth street on May 5, and with having resisted Constable Flude in the execution of his duty.
Constable Flude stated the defendant was very much under the influence of drink, and using indecent language. When witness attempted to arrest him, he acted like a madman, and it took four policemen to bring him to the station.
The P.M. imposed a fine of 10s, or in default seven days in imprisonment, on the first, and £1, or 14 days, on the other charge.

Source: CITY POLICE COURT (1911, May 6). Tasmanian News (Hobart, Tas. : 1883 - 1911), p. 2.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article187120196

G. Crosby Gilmore, Counsel for the defence
Tom Nevin's defence, former Attorney-General G. Crosby Gilmore, brought Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin, mother of the two brothers involved in this case, to testify in court that when police were called by onlookers, the cause of blood on her son Tom's face was not from any event that took place inside the house. Her sons had not been fighting with each other. Her son Tom was in his shop when he saw a man in a scuffle with his brother Bill outside on the street. When the police arrived, it was Bill they arrested, accusing Tom who followed them, crying out to police not to kill his brother, that he was inciting Bill to resist arrest. It was then that Tom's lip was cut and bloodied from police assaulting him. Mr Gilmore made it very clear to the court that Tom Nevin was an emotional man who had never before been in court, that he was innocent of the charge of inciting his brother to resist arrest, and that the blood on his face was from police striking him. Inspector Weston, counsel for the plaintiff, counter-attacked by suggesting to Tom Nevin that his brother Bill had kicked a constable so hard in the groin it "nearly ruined him for life".

Defence Counsel G. Crosby Gilmore effectively argued that Bill Nevin was resisting arrest BEFORE Tom Nevin ran to his brother's rescue. This was first inadvertently admitted by Constable Flude himself on June 2, (1911) in court. When questioned by Inspector Weston, he agreed that Bill had resisted "before his brother interfered? Oh, yes". The second argument centred on the vagaries around legal definitions of INTENT: it was not Tom Nevin's intention to incite his brother nor to obstruct police, he was simply begging the police not to be too rough with his brother, G. Crosby Gilmore argued, and there was nothing illegal in that. The case was dismissed, the charge dropped against Tom Nevin.



Defending Tom Nevin was former Attorney-General, G. C. Gilmore
Photographic portrait of the Hon. G. C. GILMORE Attorney-General of Tasmania 1904-06
Archives Office Tasmania. Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Digital/PH30-1-9972/PH30-1-9972

2. INCITING TO RESIST. (1911, June 2). Tasmanian News (Hobart, Tas.), p. 4 (5.30 EDITION).
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article187122698

TRANSCRIPT

INCITING TO RESIST

THE CONSTABLE'S EVIDENCE

A WARM JOB

Thomas Nevin was charged at the City Police Court today with having incited Wm. Nevin to resist Constables Flude and Jackson at Hobart on May 5.

He pleaded not guilty, and was defended by Mr G. C. Gilmore. Inspector Weston prosecuted.
Constable Flude said that on the night of the 5th May he had occasion to arrest the defendant's brother, Wm. Nevin. The defendant came from out of their house. He was in a very excited state, and was calling out "Don't murder him, " and also "Give him a chance". At the time they had William Nevin on the ground, where he was struggling and kicking violently. Defendant kept coming towards them and inciting him to resist. When they got Wm. Nevin on his feet he began to kick, and they - Constable Jackson and himself - found it necessary to call help. Defendant followed them down to the station, continually singing out. Going down he kept repeating , "Don't kill the man. If he's dead in the morning there will be plenty of witnesses." They gave the arrested man a chance to walk, but he refused. Defendant, Thomas Nevin, accused the police of having assaulted him, He (witness) then told him that only for him being a decent fellow he would have put him where his brother was.
Mr Weston: - Did the interference of Thomas Nevin cause William Nevin to resist? Oh, yes, I should say so.
But did he resist before his brother interfered? Oh, yes.
What did Thomas Nevin do to make William Nevin to resist? His brother calling out caused Wm Nevin to resist.
Mr Gilmore: - Did Wm Nevin's kicking and all that cause you to use him rather roughly - No, I don't believe to being rough.
Constable Wm. Jackson gave corroborative evidence. The defendant rushed up when they were arresting his brother, and said, " Oh, my poor brother, you are killing him."
To Mr. Wise: - There was a disturbance in the defendant's house, and he heard a voice calling out, "Oh, Bill", "Oh Bill," and when the defendant came to the door there was blood all over him.
Constable Clements gave evidence that he had been called to the assistance of Constables Flude and Jackson, who were taking the present defendant's brother to the police station, He corroborated the evidence of the other witnesses.
Mr. Gilmore said that defendant, Nevin, has never been in a police court before, He was a man of intensely emotional character and had a wholesome fear of the law. In a case like this the Bench should look at intent. The intention of defendant all the time was to ask the police not to hurt his brother, and he had no intention whatever of inciting him to resist.
The defendant, Thomas Nevin, said that he was working at his shop on the night of the 5th inst., when he heard a tussle near his door. He went to the window and a saw a man with his brother, who was in a state of intoxication. His brother was then brought in, but he went out again by the back way. There was some trouble in the street after that and his brother was arrested by a policeman. The constables were very rough, and he said "Give him a chance, let him up." At that time they had his brother on the ground across the gutterway. He went towards his brother, and one of the policemen swung back and hit him (witness) in the face. He went back to his shop, and then came out and followed the police. They were carrying his brother, but would insist on carrying him with his head lower than his feet, and witness asked them several times to carry him properly. He did not at any time incite his brother to resist.
Mr Gilmore: - What was your condition - your feeling - at the time? I was very much broken up at the time, and was crying part of the way.
To Mr. Weston: - There was no disturbance in the house, only that caused by his brother.
Mr. Weston: - Did you see your brother kick the police? No, I did not.
Elizabeth Nevin, mother of the defendant, corroborated the statement of her son.
Henry John Mills also gave evidence.
Mr. Gilmore: - Did you see the defendant inciting Wm Nevin to resist? - No, I did not: but I heard him screaming and crying, and saying something about killing.
It was decided at this stage to adjourn the case till Friday next.

Source: INCITING TO RESIST. (1911, June 2). Tasmanian News (Hobart, Tas.), p. 4 (5.30 EDITION)
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article187122698

Elizabeth Rachel (Day) Nevin testified in court that neither of her sons Tom or Bill had been fighting inside her house, nor had Tom any blood on his face until he was struck by police.

Elizabeth Rachel Nevin 1900

Detail of larger portrait of Elizabeth Rachel Nevin nee Day (1847-1914) taken ca. 1900
Wife of by photographer Thomas J. Nevin (1842-1923
Mother of the three sons Tom, George and Bill Nevin arrested in 1909 and 1911
Copyright © KLW NFC Group & KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection

3. POLICE COURTS. (1911, June 3). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas.), p. 8.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article10103238

TRANSCRIPT

INCITING TO RESIST THE POLICE
Thomas J. Nevin was charged with having incited his brother Wm. Nevin to resist the police whilst the latter was under arrest for being drunk and disturbing the peace. He denied the charge and was defended by Mr. Crosby Gilmore. Inspector Weston conducted the case.
Constable Flude said that about 9.15 pm on the 5th ult. he was called to a disturbance at defendant's house in Warwick street near Elizabeth street where they had occasion to arrest Wm. Nevin who was drunk and disturbing the peace. Defendant interfered, was very excited and kept calling out not to kill his brother not to murder him but to give him a chance. At the time witness had Wm. Nevin on the ground where he was struggling and kicking violently. Witness told the defendant to desist his interference or he would get into trouble. Constable Jackson blew his whistle and as they got Wm. Nevin to his feet the prisoner commenced kicking. Constables Clements and Hudson came up and the four of them had to carry Nevin to the police station. Defendant followed and interfered on the way and accused the police of having assaulted him and cut his lip. His conduct caused the prisoner to further resist and became more violent.
In reply to Mr Gilmore: We were not rough with the prisoner at all. We were not so severe on him as we should have been as my leg was painful the next day from his kicking. Hitherto I regarded the defendant as a decent man; he might be very emotional. I will swear that one of the other constables did not hit him but he asserted that he had had been struck by the police.
Constable Wm Jackson gave corroborative evidence and swore positively that neither he nor the other constables struck the defendant; when he came out of the house there was blood on defendant's face and he was very excited. There was a crowd outside urging the constables to interfere as they were "killing one another in the house".
Constable Clements gave similar evidence.
Mr Gilmore said the defendant had never been in a court of any sort before and had no intention of breaking the law; he was excited over his brother being taken to the lock-up.
The defendant gave evidence denying the charge. He got excited over the police dragging his brother along the ground and pleaded for him being given a chance when one of the constables swung his arm backwards and struck him as he (witness) stood behind. He only spoke to the police because he considered the police were treating his brother too roughly.
Inspector Weston: Do you know that your brother kicked one of the constables and nearly ruined him for life? - No I do not.
Inspector Weston: And after you interfered he became more violent.
Elizabeth Nevin, defendant's mother, swore that defendant did not leave the house with his mouth bleeding and that there was no disturbance inside.
Henry T Mills, called for the defence, said that W. Nevin was drunk and very violent and the defendant was screaming crying and shouting, "They'll kill him."
The further hearing of the case was adjourned till Friday next for the consideration of the legal point of whether what the defendant did amounted to an intention to incite the prisoner to resist.

Source: POLICE COURTS. (1911, June 3). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 8.
Link:https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article10103238

4. WHAT IS INCITING? (1911, June 30). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 3.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article10106117.

TRANSCRIPT
WHAT IS INCITING?

A LEGAL TECHNICALITY.

The adjourned hearing of the case in which Thomas Nevin was charged with inciting a prisoner to resist came on again yesterday at the Hobart Police Court, before Mr. W. O. Wise, P.M., when Mr. Gilmore, counsel for the defendant, addressed the Bench at length on the law regarding such an offence.
Mr. Gilmore said defendant's intention was to get the police to be less rough with his brother, who at the time was under arrest. He had absolutely no intention to incite his brother to resist. If a man was doing something perfectly legal in itself, and something followed from it which he did not intend and of which he had no conception, he was not responsible. There was nothing illegal in Nevin's begging the police not to be too rough with his brother, and there was no proof that he intended to incite his brother to resist. He submitted as a general principle that under any penal statute intent is a necessary ingredient, and must be proved unless the statute in express words negatives [legal use of word as verb] the need of proving such intent, or there was a necessary inference to be drawn from the wording of the statute that intent need not be proved. According to the law, as he read it, there was certainly nothing which directly negatived the need for proving intent, nor could any inference be drawn in that respect. He further submitted that Nevin, who was admittedly a decent fellow, and had never been in court before, was not guilty of inciting his brother to resist the police. He had no intention of inciting, nor did he believe that he was inciting.
The P.M. said he did not believe that Nevin said the words with the idea of inciting his brother to resist. The fact, however, remained that he did use them. He would go into the law on the point, and give a decision later.

Source: WHAT'IS INCITING? (1911, June 30). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 - 1954), p. 3.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article10106117

5. CHARGE OF INCITING TO RESIST. (1911, August 19). Daily Post (Hobart, Tas.), p. 5.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article178350509

TRANSCRIPT

CHARGE OF INCITING TO RESIST.
INTERESTING JUDGMENT.

The Police Magistrate (Mr. W. O. Wise) gave his reserved decision on August 30 in the case in which Thomas Nevin was charged with having incited a prisoner, his brother William James [sic - John, not James] Nevin, to resist Constables Flude and Jackson in the execution of their duty at Hobart on May 5.
Mr. Wise stated: "The defendant in this information, Thomas Nevin, was charged with having incited a person to resist. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and was defended by Mr. G. Grosby Gilmore. The evidence of the constables who had the said William James [sic] Nevin under lawful arrest was that the defendant Thomas Nevin was calling out 'Don’t kill him,' meaning the prisoner, and 'Give him a chance,' and such like expressions. The prisoner resisted violently, and had to be practically carried to the station. The defendant gave evidence on his own behalf, and stated that he did not attempt or intend to incite his brother to resist, but that his object in speaking to the police was to protect his brother, as he thought he was being roughly handled. The counsel quoted a number of authorities as to the meaning of the word ‘incite,’ and contended that there was no intention on the part of the defendant to incite his brother to resist.
“As far as I have been able to ascertain there is no direct decision upon what amounts to inciting a prisoner to resist, and I have come to the conclusion that each case must be decided upon its own merits. Mr. Gilmore contended that there must be some act or words of the defendant which showed that he intended to incite the prisoner to resist, although I can conceive such a case where a person, without addressing a prisoner directly, but by remarks to the arresting constable, would incite a prisoner to resist. In this case the strongest factor in the defendant's favor was that before he came upon the scene of the arrest his brother was violently resisting the constables.
"Upon perusing the evidence I have endeavored to ascertain whether the conduct of the defendant incited the prisoner, and I have come to the decision that although the conduct of the defendant, and also his remarks were most indiscreet yet they were not the cause of the prisoner resisting the police. The information will therefore be dismissed."

Source: Daily Post (Hobart, Tas. : 1908 - 1918), Saturday 19 August 1911, page 5
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article178350509



Thomas James Nevin jnr, known as Tom Nevin (1874-1948)
Also known as Sonny to family, taken by a family member ca. 1947
Photo copyright © KLW NFC 2020 Private Collection

Tom Nevin with wife Gertrude Tennyson Bates, (1883-1958) and their second son Athol Clarence Nevin (born  Launceston, 26 October 1915), travelled to California in 1920 to reside for a time with his wife's family who had migrated there in the early 1900s. They returned to Hobart in 1922. Tom Nevin joined the Salvation Army soon after. He was farewelled as Sergeant Tom Nevin on his death in 1948, his address given as 23 Newdegate St. North Hobart, where three of his siblings - May, George, and Albert and family - still resided. By 1949, Tom and Gertrude's son Athol, who had served in WW2 and changed his middle name to "Tennyson", was resident in Melbourne, working as a storeman.

Some Quiet Observations
Bill Nevin's personal reasons for finding himself in the midst of altercations in public and the calls for his arrest might never be known. He may have inherited his father's alleged alcoholism more as a genetic disorder than a behavioural issue when arrested for being drunk and disorderly in 1909, and drunk and disturbing the peace in 1911. Temperance was certainly a factor in the lives of his nieces and nephews, remembered and noted even today for abstinence. Noted too were the family's objections to war. Not since the emigration of their grandfather John Nevin to Tasmania in 1852 would a single direct descendant ever serve in a war, which was not the case for the other (unrelated) Nevin family who had settled at Hadspen in the north of the island. James and Mary (Hemphill) Nevin 's grandson Archibald Reinmuth Nevin was 24 yrs old when he was killed in action in Belgium on 23 September 1916.

Just possibly, Bill Nevin in his twenties was simply an exuberant, happy fellow, given to drinking and dancing and singing too loudly in public. But to authority he was hostile, which might explain his furious response to provocations resulting in scuffles and arrests with the ensuing brutal treatment by police, and the anxiety of both his brothers to protect him. Tom had shouted at Constables Flude and Jackson not to murder his brother Bill during the incident outside the house in Warwick St. on the evening of May 6, 1911, fearing they might actually kill him.

Whatever the incident, the police saw Bill Nevin as fair game, a target for their social prejudices and physical abuse for several reasons, and not all to do with the law. They would likely interpret his attention-seeking behaviour and snappy dress-sense as signs he might not be a cis-gender male. Since Bill Nevin was working as a shop assistant during these years (Denison electoral rolls 1905 ...), he would dress like all front-of-store men who were employed at large shops such as Fitzgerald's and Moran & Cato's or at the fancy shoe-shop called Ray's (photo below). He would suit-up in a three-piece, button-hole a gold chain for his fobwatch, wax his moustache, curl his forelock, and pin a pansy to his lapel, as in this photograph ca. 1897:

Wm John Nevin 1900

Sporting a fancy fedora with a teardrop crease and front pinch in finest wool (as in the signed negative photo below ca. 1908), his grooming fit the stereotype of the gay bachelor shop assistant for whom Constable Flude would undoubtedly pursue to find a law with a view to arrest.



Ray's shoe store, Hobart, Tasmania (c1900s)
Photographer; C. P. Ray, Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office: album at Flickr

Bill's single marital status too was another unknown aspect of his family life. His three siblings - brothers Tom and Albert and younger sister Minnie were either married by 1909 or would eventually marry and have children, but William seemed to have stayed single. But so too it seems, had George and his eldest sister May (Mary Florence Elizabeth Nevin) who was rumoured to cross-dress and follow her brother George around at night - she never married and even devoted her life to her father, caring for him until his death in 1923. Bill Nevin wore the stereotypic signs which police perceived to contradict the conventional masculine norms of the day as indices of deviance. Tasmania decriminalised homosexuality in 1997, the last Australian state or territory to do so, and was the only state to criminalise "cross-dressing", which was decriminalised in 2001 [!!!]. Perhaps Bill Nevin was gay, perhaps not. The lack of  historical marriage records in his name means little but he certainly went a-wooing with prints such as this one signed "Yours Truly, Will". If the intended recipients of this print were strictly female, no evidence has yet emerged that he actually married one. That he signed himself "Will" here when immaculately dressed to the nines while his siblings called him by the more vernacular  "Bill" was another sure sign he saw himself well above the status of the grubby policemen who stalked him.



Negative inscribed by Bill Nevin, signing himself as "Will"
"Yours Truly, Will": William John Nevin ca. 1905-1910
Print from a glass negative of Thomas J. Nevin's third son William John Nevin (1878-1927)
Copyright © KLW NFC Group and KLW NFC Imprint, Shelverton Private Collection ARR

Wm John NEVIN, prison record 1920
Soon after the death of their father Thomas J. Nevin in 1923, his four adult children - Bill (William), George,  Albert and May (Mary Florence) Nevin - moved to the large property at 23 Newdegate St. North Hobart. Albert had married in Launceston in 1917 and brought his wife Emily Maud Davis with him. They occupied the small cottage on the property.  Bill, George and May were single and lived in the big house fronting Newdegate Street. Bill was working as "cook" in 1920 when lost his temper, unleashing a series of expletives. He was photographed at the Police Office Hobart on 8th December, 1920, charged with using obscene language. The charge "obscene language", of course, might have denoted any mild curse or epithet. These sorts of menial and trivial charges were a source of revenue for the Tasmanian Government in an era when personal income tax was yet to be formally legislated.





Name: Nevin, William
Record Type: Prisoners
Year:1920
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1483648
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Digital/GD63-1-5P726

William Nevin, charged with obscene language on 8th December 1920, was sentenced to three days at the Police Office, Hobart. These police records in Book 7 were damaged by fire at the Hobart Gaol, but some detail is visible: William's occupation was "cook" in 1920, for example. His moustache had become a shaggy half-horseshoe once again.

Wm John NEVIN, accidental death 1927
William (Bill or Will) Nevin established a carrier and furniture removal business in the early 1920s which he partnered with his elder brother Tom, younger brother Albert and brother-in-law James Drew who had married their younger sister Minnie Nevin in 1907. They had vans as well as carts and horses, operating from Morrison St. Hobart Wharf and nearby Market Place. When siblings May, Albert, George and Bill Nevin moved to the property at 23-29 Newdegate St. in 1923 on the death of their father Thomas J. Nevin (registered as "photographer" on his burial certificate), Bill maintained the carrier business there until his untimely death in a horse and cart accident in 1927.

William John (Bill) Nevin was 49 years old when he died in a horse-and-cart accident on the 28th October 1927. The accident and coroner's inquest were reported in the press, 31st October 1927. The death of Bill Nevin, victim of drink, was served up as a moral about alcohol for Mercury readers.



William John Nevin (1878-1927)
Verso inscription "William J. Nevin, Furniture Removalist"
Unattributed, no date, ca. 1926? Died in a cart accident, 1927.
From the estate of William John Nevin (1878-1927)
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection

TRANSCRIPT
FALL FROM A CART
DEATH Of WILLIAM JOHN NEVIN.
VICTIM OF DRINK.
The Coroner (Mr. E. TV. Turner) found, on Saturday, that William John Nevin, aged 49 years, who died in the Hobart Public Hospital on Wednesday last, succumbed to wounds accidentally received as the result of having fallen from a cart in Elizabeth Street the previous day. At the inquest, the police were represented by Inspector A. Bush.
The story of the accident was told by Percy Johnson, a carter, living in Murray Street. On Tuesday night, about 8.20, he said, Nevin and a man named Leslie Smith came to his house under the influence of drink. Nevin's cart was standing outside the Waratah Hotel. Witness joined the two men, and had a drink with them In the hotel. Smith was not served with intoxicants, as "he had had too many." The three then got into the cart, and witness intended to drive the other two home. However, Nevin Insisted on driving, and they went along Warwick Street and down Elizabeth Street at full gallop. They "pulled up" outside McLaren's Hotel, in Collins Street, and when they got out of the cart a man said to witness, "There are two sergeants on the corner watching you." Witness got the two men into the cart again, and took charge. Nevin and Smith sat down. Witness drove up Elizabeth Street until just before Warwick Street. Smith's legs were hanging over the back, and he said, "Pull up. I am going to get out." Witness "pulled up " and Smith and Nevin got out. A few minutes later they got Into the cart again. Nevin stood up and made a dash forward. He snatched the reins from witness, and fell over the side. Witness felt a bump, and when he got out he saw Nevin on the ground, with the reins round his foot and his leg through the wheel. He drove Nevin and Smith to the Public Hospital.

Charles Harold Dowsing, an eye-witness of the events which occurred when the cart returned up Elizabeth Street, near Warwick Street, corroborated the evidence given by Johnson. Smith was not called.

Dr. B. M. Carruthers, House Surgeon at the Public Hospital, said there were hardly any signs of external injury on the deceased when he was admitted to hospital. He was injured severely internally. His collar-bone was broken, a broken rib had pierced a lung, and another had pierced his heart. Death was due, in the first place, to shock, and, secondly, to collapse caused by haemorrhage.

The Coroner said that deceased was another victim of drink. His finding would be that death was due to injuries accidentally received as a result of a fall from a cart in Elizabeth Street, Hobart. The moral was obvious.

Source: FALL FROM A CART (1927, October 31). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas), p. 9.
Link: https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article24206465

In Memoriam notice from Bill Nevin's siblings, 1928

In Memoriam 1828 Nevin family Hobart

Family Notices (1928, October 26). The Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 186 - 1954), p. 1.
https://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article24236425

Addenda

1. GAY YOUNG THINGS
These photographs were passed down by descent from the estate of William (Bill) Nevin. They were taken in the Edwardian period, the years 1900s-1920s named for fashions set by the Prince of Wales [King Edward VIII] when young working class men who liked to dress for occasions favoured a three piece suit, rounded shirt collars, cuffs, a Prince Albert fob chain and and a wide-brimmed fedora, the sort worn by Prince Edward when he visited Tasmania in 1920.



One of Thomas and Elizabeth's four adult sons -
Possibly George or Tom (Thomas J. jnr) or Bill (William John) Nevin ca. 1901
Posed in best suit - full length portrait with wicker whatnot.
Family photograph taken at home by his father Thomas Nevin snr
From the estate of William John Nevin (1878-1927)
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection 2020 ARR.



Subject: two well-dressed young men, unidentified, seated on a studio railing
Photographer: Burrows & Co. Studio, Launceston
Location and date: Launceston Tasmania ca. 1910
Details: Cabinet photograph printed as a postcard
From the estate of William John Nevin (1878-1927)
Copyright © KLW NFC Group & KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection



Subject: two well-dressed young men, unidentified, one seated one standing
Photographer: unknown
Location and date: possibly Melbourne or Sydney ca. 1923
Details: Cabinet photograph printed as a postcard
Verso inscribed with mostly illegible information about dancing to "The Blue Lagoon"
From the estate of William John Nevin (1878-1927)
Copyright © KLW NFC Group & KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection

POSTCARD verso: "... they have a lot of different dances over here but they have grand hall's & always a orchestra playing they play the Blue Lagoon for a Barn Dance and it goes all right ..."

This recording made for the 1923 film "The Blue Lagoon" is most likely the music mentioned by the writer of this postcard.



"The Blue Lagoon" is a lost 1923 British-South African silent film adaptation of Henry De Vere Stacpoole's 1908 novel of the same name about children who come of age while stranded on a tropical island ....
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Lagoon_(1923_film)#Development
https://youtu.be/iTlbuA20ThI?feature=shared

2. BDM RECORDS: William John (Bill) NEVIN (1878-1927)

1878: Birth registration



Name: Nevin, William John
Record Type: Births
Gender: Male
Father: Nevin, Thomas
Mother: Day, Elizabeth Rachel
Date of birth: 14 Mar 1878
Registered: Hobart 1878
Record ID:NAME_INDEXES: 1093874
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/NamesIndex/1093874

1927: Burial registration
Source: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/NamesIndex/1560157,Church of England EE - Page 24, Plot 277





Nevin, William John
Record Type: Deaths
Age: 49
Description: Last known residence: 23 Newdegate St
Property: Cornelian Bay Cemetery
Date of burial: 28 Oct 1927
File number: BU 26646
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1560157
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/NamesIndex/1560157


3. BDM RECORDS: Thomas James "Tom" NEVIN (1874-1948)
https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/NamesIndex/976011

1874: Birth registration



Nevin, Thomas James
Record Type: Births
Gender: Male
Father: Nevin, Thomas James
Mother: Day, Elizabeth Rachel
Date of birth: 16 Apr 1874
Registered: Hobart
Registration year: 1874
Record ID:NAME_INDEXES: 976011
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/NamesIndex/976011


1907: Marriage to Gertrude Jane Tennyson BATES

Nevin, Thomas James
Record Type: Marriages
Spouse: Bates, Gertrude Jane Tennyson
Date of marriage: 06 Feb 1907
Where married: Melville Street, Hobart
Registration year:1907
File number: 465
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1940114
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/NamesIndex/1940114


1909-1911: Birth and death of son Walter Sydney Tennison NEVIN



Name: Nevin, Walter Sydney Tennyson
Record Type: Births
Gender: Male
Father: Nevin, Thomas James
Mother: Tennyson Bates, Gertrude Jane
Parent occupation: Storeman
Date of birth: 09 Dec 1909
Registered: Hobart
Registration year: 1910
Central registration number: 711
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:2209131
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/NamesIndex/2091128




DEATH from bronchial pneumonia: Nevin, Walter Sydney Tennison
Record Type: Deaths
Gender: Male
Date of death: 14 Aug 1911
Where died: Paternoster Row, Hobart
Registration year: 1911
File number: 1141
Record ID: NAME_INDEXES:1998961
Link: https://libraries.tas.gov.au/Record/NamesIndex/1998961


Wallet 1900s

Leather wallet with initials "W. J. Nevin" 1880s-1927
From the estate of William John Nevin (1878-1927)
Copyright © KLW NFC Imprint Private Collection

RELATED POSTS main weblog